The Insane Logistics of a Roman Army on the March - 24 Hour Simulation 3D DOCUMENTARY

Unraveling the Intricate Logistics of the Roman Army

The Roman Empire is renowned for its military prowess and conquests, but behind the grandeur of their legions lies a complex web of logistical challenges. In a captivating 3D documentary titled "The Insane Logistics of a Roman Army on the March," we gain insight into the meticulous planning and coordination required for a 24-hour march of 50,000 Roman soldiers.

This immersive experience not only showcases the impressive mobility and endurance of the Roman army but also highlights the indispensable role of logistics in their success.

The documentary opens by emphasizing the formidable logistical challenges faced by Roman armies. The 24-hour march simulation vividly illustrates the need for strategic coordination when managing a colossal force like the Roman legions.

Acknowledging the inherent limitations in reconstructing the Roman Army, the video credits various authors and sources. It reveals a critical piece of information: the maximum distance an army can cover in a day is approximately 65 km at a regular pace and 75 km at a quick pace. These figures are based on meticulous calculations and a daylight chart for a Mediterranean latitude during campaign seasons.

Roman armies on the move had to meticulously plan logistics and employ innovative strategies. They would divide into smaller groups to handle various tasks efficiently. This approach aimed to avoid traffic jams and optimize their time on the march.

The documentary then unfolds the march of the Roman Army, spanning an astonishing 25 km. The army commences its journey in the pre-dawn hours, with reconnaissance forces and a vanguard prepared to surmount any obstacles that lie ahead.

The Roman army is a well-oiled machine with a highly organized formation. While support staff and gear remain behind, infantry and cavalry extend in a long column. The baggage train, though crucial, could potentially cause delays.

The Roman Army on the march is a massive operation that extends 25 km. It comprises various specialized groups, including the Rear Guard and Flank Guard, tasked with protecting the army and its precious baggage train. Although the planned distance is 20 km, it would take a marathon runner a staggering 1 hour and 12 minutes to cover the entire length.

The documentary highlights the efficiency of the Roman army in setting up camp, foraging for supplies, completing chores, and marching toward their objective. This underlines the monumental importance of logistics and road-building in ancient Rome.

As we delve into the intricacies of the Roman Army's logistics through this 3D documentary, we gain a profound appreciation for the meticulous planning and coordination that underpinned their military successes. From the sprawling march formations to the careful orchestration of support staff, every aspect of logistics played a crucial role in the Roman Empire's dominance. This immersive experience provides a window into the awe-inspiring capabilities of one of history's most formidable military forces, reminding us of the critical role logistics plays in any great endeavor.

The Roman Mosaic that was Found in Ancient Slave Monster’s Villa

Researchers have discovered an antique Roman mosaic that formerly adorned the residence of the dreadful tyrant Publius Vedius Pollio at a luxurious coastal mansion in Posillipo, close to Naples. Legend has it that Pollio, who is remembered for his heinous treatment of slaves, even fed his workers parasitic worms.

Pauslypon, which translates to "respite from concern," is a posh residential area in the Naples hills. Ancient Greek and Roman texts claim that wealthy Roman families during the Roman era were drawn to the coastline of Campania, much as today's residents of Los Angeles are drawn to beachside houses along the coast of Malibu.

The 770-meter (2526-foot)-long "Grotta Seiano" tunnel, which was initially dug during the Roman era, is the only way to get to Posillipo. A collection of historic Roman buildings facing the sea make up the Pausilypon Archaeological-Environmental Park, which is based on Vedius Pollio's main mansion, one of history's most dreadful dictators. Researchers discovered a unique mosaic floor from the villa's initial building at this old villa.

This location, also referred to as the Imperial Villa, is located on a rocky promontory at the far end of the Bay of Naples. An Odeon offered smaller performances and also a 2000-seat mega-theatre for major nights. Moreover, a bath complex and a Nymphaeum shrine dedicated to water nymphs made sure that the city's privileged citizens and visitors enjoyed the pinnacle of luxury.

In a recent news release, archaeologists from the University of Naples L'Orientale stated that the mosaic was found in a living room with a view of the sea in Naples. "Tiny white pieces of tesserae with a double black framing" were used to create the floor covering. The term "tesserae" refers to any tiny piece of stone, glass, or ceramic in ancient Roman mosaic art.

The mosaic's excavation was overseen by Professor Marco Giglio of the L'Orientale University of Naples, who noted that while stratigraphic dating was impossible, the mosaic's design suggested that it may have originated during "the late Republican age or Augustan at the latest." The relic may not be outstanding, but its setting is arguably of the utmost significance.

The mosaic is thought to have been buried beneath remodeling projects that Emperor Augustus ordered following Vedius's passing. We must first study a little about the dreadful deeds of Publius Vedius Pollio in order to comprehend why a Roman emperor spent money at a soldier's opulent resort.

According to an article in Heritage Daily, Pollio became well-known in the first century BC not only for his opulent tastes but also for his "cruelty to slaves." The fact that this affluent Roman cavalier was born into a family of freed slaves makes Pollio's horrendous treatment of his fellow humans, in this case slaves, all the more repulsive.

Hearing about the details of his particularly heinous treatment of slaves makes Pollio seem to have been a traitor of the highest and most vile sort. Yet Pollio wasn't only interested in "regular" torture; according to history, he also had a fetish for intense agony and horror.

The incident that occurred when Augustus himself visited the opulent mansion in the Bay of Naples is arguably the most illustrative of Pollio's diabolical methods. A slave carrying a cup stumbled while serving dinner and broke a crystal glass. Pollio ordered the man to be thrown into a well with parasitic lamprey worms as punishment for his small infraction. But this time, the slave begged Augustus for pity.

The emperor gave the order to destroy all of Publius Vedius Pollio's most valuable glasses because he was so dissatisfied with how Pollio had assessed and treated the slave. Furthermore, he gave the order to fill the eel pool.

Vedius Pollio was so ashamed of himself that he left Augustus his entire fortune in 15 BC when he passed away. All Roman emperors up until Hadrian in 138 AD had control over it as an imperial possession. So, the mosaic provides yet another window into the extravagant wealth of a very repulsive man who fed parasitic human beings.

Roman Castra - How Legionaries Built and Lived in their Fortresses


THE ARCHAEOLOGIST EDITOR GROUP


Fortress Construction and Life in the Imperial Period

The Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and martial prowess, were not only formidable warriors but also adept builders. During the Imperial Period (27 BC – 476 AD), the expanding boundaries of the Roman Empire necessitated the establishment of fortified bases across diverse terrains. These fortresses served as vital hubs for military, administrative, and logistical operations. Understanding how legionaries built and lived in these fortresses offers a glimpse into the Roman military's daily life and the Empire's broader strategic objectives.

Construction of the Fortress

1. Site Selection: Ideally, the Romans selected sites that offered natural defenses, like hills or river bends, while also ensuring proximity to vital transportation routes.

2. Standardized Layout: Roman military forts, known as "castra", typically followed a standardized rectangular plan. The size could vary based on the intended number of troops, but the general design remained consistent.

3. Fortifications: Walls, usually constructed initially from turf or wood and later replaced with stone, encircled the fortress. These walls were further reinforced by towers and a V-shaped ditch known as a fossa.

4. Interior Structures: Inside the fortress, roads were laid in a grid pattern, with the main road, the via praetoria, leading to the main entrance. Essential buildings included the principia (headquarters), horrea (granaries), valetudinarium (hospital), and barracks for the legionaries. There were also workshops, bathhouses, and temples.

5. Speed and Efficiency: Owing to their training and experience, legionaries could construct a basic fort in a matter of days, making it possible to establish a secure base even during active campaigns.

Life Within the Fortress Walls

1. Daily Routine: The life of a Roman soldier was highly regimented. Days began with the sounding of a bugle, followed by morning drills, weapon training, and other duties. Soldiers also engaged in construction projects, road building, and maintenance tasks.

2. Diet: Legionaries consumed a diet primarily consisting of wheat or barley, which they often made into porridge or bread. They also ate lentils, beans, vegetables, and occasionally meat. The horrea, or granaries, played a crucial role, ensuring that legions had a steady supply of grains.

3. Recreation: While their lives were rigorous, soldiers did have moments of leisure. They visited bathhouses, engaged in gambling or board games, and sometimes attended performances in makeshift theaters within the fort.

4. Religious Life: The Romans were deeply religious, and this extended to their military life. Temples within the fortress were dedicated to various deities, including the god of war, Mars, and the Imperial cult. Rituals and sacrifices were an integral part of the legionaries' lives.

5. Cohesion and Morale: The fortresses were not just military bases; they were tight-knit communities. The sense of brotherhood among the soldiers, combined with a rigorous daily routine and shared responsibilities, fostered unit cohesion and high morale.

Conclusion

The Roman legions' fortresses were marvels of strategic design, engineering prowess, and organizational skill. They were not just impenetrable strongholds but also thriving microcosms of Roman society. By delving into the intricacies of their construction and daily life, one gains a deeper appreciation for the legionaries' adaptability and the Roman Empire's expansive infrastructure.

What is the Phantom Time Hypothesis Theory?

By Katie Serena | Checked By John Kuroski

Original title: Bizarre Phantom Time Hypothesis Theory Says It’s Actually The Year 1720 Because The Early Middle Ages Were Faked

According to the Phantom Time Hypothesis, Charlemagne never existed along with 297 years that were just made up.

In a world where every idea seems divisive, it can help to know there are at least a few things that the world as a whole agrees on. Time, the calendar, and the basic idea that history as we know it happened pretty much like historians say it did are just a few of those things. After all, at the very least we can all agree that the year is 2017, right?

Wrong.

According to German historian Heribert Illig, the year is actually 1720, the Gregorian calendar is a lie, and a chunk of Middle Ages was completely made up.

No, this man is not crazy (at least not officially) and he actually claims to have archeological evidence to support his case.

In 1991, Illig proposed his theory, aptly called the Phantom Time Hypothesis. He claims there was conspiracy entered into back in 1000 AD to change the dating system by three world rulers.

Illig claims that Pope Sylvester II, Holy Roman Emperor Otto III, and Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII all got together and changed the calendar to make it seem as if Otto had begun his reign in the millennial year of 1000 AD, rather than 996. The reason being that 1000 sounded a lot more meaningful than 996 considering AD stands for “anno domini,” or, “the year of the Lord.”

Illig further claims that the trio altered existing documents, and created fraudulent historical events and people in order to back themselves up. He claims that Holy Roman Emperor Charlemagne was not in fact a real ruler, but simply a King Arthur-type legend. He explains that through all of this tampering and forgery, an extra 297 years were added to history.

Two hundred and ninety-seven years that didn’t actually happen.

Illig says that an inadequate system of dating medieval artifacts, as well as an over-reliance on written history are to blame. According to his research, the years between 614 and 911 AD don’t quite add up. The years prior to 614 were full of historically significant events, as were the years after 911, however, he claims that the ones in between were unusually dull.

He also points out that mathematical discrepancies between the Julian and Gregorian calendars further complicates things. The Julian calendar says that a full year is 365.25 days long, whereas the Gregorian calendar — the one we use now — says it’s actually 11 minutes shorter than that.

Furthermore, Illig claims that Roman architecture in 10th century western Europe is too modern for the time period in which it was supposedly built.

Though his Phantom Time Hypothesis seems far fetched, Illig has actually managed to find some supporters.

Dr. Hans-Ulrich Niemitz published a paper in 1995 titled “Did the Early Middle Ages Really Exist?” in which he claims they did not.

“Between Antiquity (1 AD) and the Renaissance (1500 AD) historians count approximately 300 years too many in their chronology,” Niemitz wrote. “In other words: the Roman emperor Augustus really lived 1700 years ago instead of the conventionally assumed 2000 years.”

Some of Niemitz’s claims echoed Illig’s, such has the discrepancies between the Julian and Gregorian calendars and the lack of reliable historical sources. Though, Neimitz did admit that a counterargument could exist, as the Byzantium and Islamic regions were at war during the period, which was well documented.

Most historians worldwide are critical of the Phantom Time Hypothesis. Countless historians have chosen to argue it have used recorded dates of solar eclipses to do so, along with documented histories from other parts of the world that overlap the “missing” time periods.

Public Latrines in Ancient Rome

Almost every Roman city had large public latrines, where many people - often 20 or more - could relieve themselves in remarkably opulent settings. This video explores how the use, decoration, and (many) hazards of Rome's latrines.

The Romans were unprecedented in their adoption of toilets. Around the first century bc, public latrines became a major feature of Roman infrastructure, much like bathhouses, says Koloski-Ostrow. And nearly all city dwellers had access to private toilets in their residences.

They were afraid of connecting their houses to the sewers, since they feared what might climb out of a sewer into one's house. They also feared the mephitic gas fires that sometimes burned in sewer holes or in the open seats in public toilets.

Among them was the use of communal toilets, featuring the long benches with small holes cut into them. These benches sat above channels of flowing water, although each communal toilet was different in the depth and velocity of the water flowing underneath.

Our ancient Roman would simply wipe him- or herself, rinse the tersorium in whatever was available (running water and/or a bucket of vinegar or salt water), and leave it for the next person to use. That's right, it was a shared butt cleaner.

Apparently during the flood water with faeces could spill from toilets; in turn, a large amount of methane in the pipes could even cause a flame explosion. The proof that ancient Romans were afraid – in some sense – of toilets is the fact that we find fewer traces of graffiti in toilets than in other public places.

If you relieved yourself in a public latrine in ancient Rome, you may have used a tersorium to wipe. These ancient devices consisted of a stick with a vinegar- or salt water-soaked sponge attached.

Greek Archaeologists Unearthed Stunning Roman-Era Statue of Hercules at Philippi, Eastern Macedonia

A larger than life-sized statue of Hercules, unearthed by archaeologists from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, may have adorned a public fountain.

The statue, depicting a youthful Hercules, dates to the 2nd century AD. © Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sports

The latest season of archaeological fieldwork at Philippi in northeast Greece, carried out by members of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, came to an end last week with a startling new discovery.

This year’s excavations, led by Professor Natalia Poulou, focused on the east side of one of the main streets of the ancient Macedonian city, which meets another main axis passing further north. The point of convergence between the two streets is marked by a large square dominated by a richly decorated edifice, most likely a public fountain.

A lion's pelt hangs from the statue's left arm, attesting to its identity as the ancient hero Hercules.

© Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sports

The edifice bore a special architectural decoration, fragments of which were discovered during the excavation. Its decoration was complemented by an impressive larger than life-sized statue from the Roman period, dating to the 2nd century AD.

The statue depicts a youthful Hercules, the Roman equivalent of the Greek Heracles, holding a club – fragments of which were found during the excavation – and a lion’s pelt hanging from his outstretched left hand, attesting to the identity of the hero. He is also depicted wearing a wreath of vine leaves with a tape at the back, the ends of which drape across his broad shoulders.

The archaeologists believe the statue adorned a public fountain.

© Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Sports

According to the research team, and based on the findings from the excavation, the statue adorned a much later building from the 8th or 9th century. It is known form contemporary sources that Classical and Roman-era statues were used to decorate buildings and places of public use up until the Late Byzantine period.

The discovery at Philippi now confirms this to be the case – that pre-Christian statues were used to decorate public spaces in important cities of the Byzantine empire.

The excavations, attended by 24 students and funded by the Research Committee of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, will continue next year.