• MAIN PAGE
  • LATEST NEWS
    • Lost Cities
    • Archaeology's Greatest Finds
    • Underwater Discoveries
    • Greatest Inventions
    • Studies
    • Blog
  • PHILOSOPHY
  • HISTORY
  • RELIGIONS
    • Africa
    • Anatolia
    • Arabian Peninsula
    • Balkan Region
    • China - East Asia
    • Europe
    • Eurasian Steppe
    • Levant
    • Mesopotamia
    • Oceania - SE Asia
    • Pre-Columbian Civilizations of America
    • Iranian Plateau - Central Asia
    • Indus Valley - South Asia
    • Japan
    • The Archaeologist Editor Group
    • Scientific Studies
    • Aegean Prehistory
    • Historical Period
    • Byzantine Middle Ages
    • Predynastic Period
    • Dynastic Period
    • Greco-Roman Egypt
  • Rome
  • PALEONTOLOGY
  • About us
Menu

The Archaeologist

  • MAIN PAGE
  • LATEST NEWS
  • DISCOVERIES
    • Lost Cities
    • Archaeology's Greatest Finds
    • Underwater Discoveries
    • Greatest Inventions
    • Studies
    • Blog
  • PHILOSOPHY
  • HISTORY
  • RELIGIONS
  • World Civilizations
    • Africa
    • Anatolia
    • Arabian Peninsula
    • Balkan Region
    • China - East Asia
    • Europe
    • Eurasian Steppe
    • Levant
    • Mesopotamia
    • Oceania - SE Asia
    • Pre-Columbian Civilizations of America
    • Iranian Plateau - Central Asia
    • Indus Valley - South Asia
    • Japan
    • The Archaeologist Editor Group
    • Scientific Studies
  • GREECE
    • Aegean Prehistory
    • Historical Period
    • Byzantine Middle Ages
  • Egypt
    • Predynastic Period
    • Dynastic Period
    • Greco-Roman Egypt
  • Rome
  • PALEONTOLOGY
  • About us

Illustration by Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

The Labrys: Exploring the Evolution of the Sacred Double Axe from Neolithic Anatolia to the Minoan Labyrinth

April 25, 2024

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis


The Labrys as a Cultural Keystone from Çatal Höyük to Knossos

The odyssey of the labrys, a symbol par excellence of divine authority and ritual, commences long before its renowned association with the Minoan civilization. Originating within the prehistoric tapestry of Anatolia, specifically at the site of Çatalhöyük, the labrys' presence can be traced back to a society flourishing from 7500 to 5700 BCE. Already from that time, the double axe emerges not merely as a tool but as a ceremonial artifact, integral to the worship practices of early agrarian communities.

As the embodiment of power and religious life, the labrys traversed maritime routes from the Anatolian and Greek mainlands to Minoan Crete, where it became a central motif in the island's intricate palatial complexes and religious iconography, reflecting a narrative of cultural transmission and adaptation that spanned across centuries.

From Neolithic Anatolia to Minoan Crete: The Journey of the Labrys

The ancient Greeks referred to the double axe as "labrys," a term steeped in mystery and hailing from the depths of the Neolithic and Chalcolithic periods of Anatolia. This word had already found relevance during the Minoan era, hinting at a connection with the term "labyrinth." Plutarch notes that 'labrys' is the Lydian term for 'axe,' stating: "The Lydians call the double-edged axe 'labrys.'"

Originating in the East, the double axe's earliest representations are traced back to Çatalhöyük, an early Neolithic proto-city in Anatolia. Its depiction was not only artistic but symbolic, reflecting the complex, maze-like layout of the settlement. The oldest artifact of a double axe unearthed to date was at Gürcü Tepe, situated east of Çatalhöyük, within a similar cultural sphere. Gürcü Tepe's rural character suggests that the double axe served an apotropaic role, warding off evil.

At Çatalhöyük, one encounters the double axe intermingled with bull iconography within the community's intricate art. Bulls are rendered with detailed anatomical precision, symbolizing virility and fecundity within this early agrarian society. The double axe, appearing both in art and as tangible relics, likely bore a sacred import, potentially linked to male divinities or sacrificial rituals. These symbols reflect the spiritual practices and complex social structures of one of humanity's initial urban centers.

View fullsize FdIc8SVWQAgGfYy.jpeg
View fullsize 91222abe1ce432b1126835c3c3d3b5035e8a385a (1).jpg
View fullsize 8d63b61213ffb466a7779cb11b335643.jpg
View fullsize 5285322014ecf.image.jpg
View fullsize 2024-04-24 200404 (1).png
View fullsize 2024-04-24 200317 (1).png

The emblematic significance of the double axe on Crete is believed to stem from the Neolithic settlers' religious beliefs, which were characterized by reverence for an Earth Mother Goddess, indicative of the island's enduring spiritual traditions. In Minoan Crete, the labrys fulfilled both ritual and votive roles. It was the primary instrument in the ceremonial sacrifice of sacred bulls and was also offered in burial rites, caves, and peak sanctuaries. Seals and the Archanes Script provide evidence of the double axe's significance, which was so ingrained in Minoan culture that it predates the Prepalatial Period. The Minoan religion was anchored in the veneration of the Mother Goddess, a primordial figure of fertility, reproduction, and the cyclical rebirth of nature.

The double axe holds a venerable place in the mythology of ancient Near Eastern cultures, symbolizing the might of deities like the Hurrian sky and storm god, Teshub. In Hittite and Luwian traditions, this god was known as Tarhun, often depicted wielding a double axe alongside a triple thunderbolt—a clear emblem of his dominion over storms. This formidable storm god is also depicted on a relief brandishing a double axe, a symbol of his power, as he stands over a bull. In parallel, the Greek god Zeus is traditionally depicted hurling thunderbolts, employing the labrys, or pelekys, as his instrument to command the storm. Intriguingly, the modern Greek term for lightning, "astropeleki" (ἀστροπελέκι), translates to "star-axe," perpetuating the ancient association of the axe with celestial power.

View fullsize tarhunz.jpg
View fullsize e440ccbe-5bbd-4172-8317-ae52da21ba07 (1).jpeg
View fullsize FdIc712XoAU4YYT (1).jpeg
View fullsize images.jpeg
View fullsize FdIc8wVWYAQo9eD (1).jpeg
View fullsize SATRAPS_of_CARIA._Hidrieus._Circa_351-0_to_344-3_BC (1).jpg
View fullsize GOPR1813.jpg
View fullsize 20200807_182446.jpg
View fullsize GOPR1812.jpg

The worship of the double axe on the Greek island of Tenedos and other locations in southwestern Asia Minor is evidence that this reverence persisted into classical antiquity. The labrys also found its place in the worship practices associated with the Anatolian thunder god, further evidenced in the Hellenistic period with the cult of Zeus Labrayndeus, where the labrys continued to be a potent symbol of divine storm-making power. This continuity of the double axe's symbolism across different cultures and eras reflects its enduring significance in the religious and mythological landscape of the Mediterranean and Near East.

The depiction of bulls and double axes across various ancient cultures—from the bull frescoes of Çatalhöyük and Minoan bull-leaping iconography to the imagery of the Hittite and Luwian god Tarhun wielding a double axe over a bull—suggests a hypothetical cultural linkage. These symbols, recurring throughout ancient Anatolia and Crete, may signify a shared mythological language where the bull symbolizes strength and fertility, and the double axe represents divine authority, reflecting an enduring tradition of reverence and ritual that transcends regional and temporal boundaries.

A Roman bronze ensign of Jupiter Dolichenus. One can make out other deities including Hercules, Victoria, Luna and perhaps in the lower right hand corner is Mars. This amazing piece is on display in the Hungarian National Museum in Budapest, Hungary.

The Linguistic Enigma: Labrys, labraunda and the Greek Labyrinthos

The path of the labrys intertwines with the evolution of language, presenting a fascinating enigma that captivates linguists and historians alike. The term 'labrys' finds its echoes in the pre-Greek word 'labyrinthos,' an association derived from the interpretation of ancient texts, most notably a Linear B tablet that references the 'Mistress of the Labyrinth.' This coupling of the labrys with the intricate and complex structure of the labyrinth carries profound implications, suggesting a sacred dimension wherein the axe is not only a symbol of divine power but also an architectural metaphor. The linguistic fluidity of ancient Greek, where phonemes like 'd' and 'l' could interchange (Dabraundos, dabrys), adds layers of complexity to this enigma, inviting scholars to delve deeper into the maze of historical language development.

The word "labrys," which the Lydians or Carians used to refer to a double-edged axe, also serves as the basis for the name of the renowned labyrinth of Knossos, indicating an intriguing cultural connection between the civilizations of Western Anatolia and Minoan Crete. The labyrinth is often interpreted as the "place of the axe," a phrase that resonates with the central role of the labrys within both Minoan and Carian sacred spaces. The significance of the labrys is further highlighted by its enduring presence in Carian religious sites, such as Labraunda, where it was revered as a holy artifact.

View fullsize 19862835294_1793489d07_b (1).jpg
View fullsize 4393 (1).jpg
View fullsize Labraunda_Andron_B_and_A_and_more_3906 (1).jpg
View fullsize fig._1 (1).png

The term "labrys," first noted in English in 1901 according to the Oxford English Dictionary, is intimately linked to the ancient Carian sanctuary of Labranda. This connection highlights the significance of the labrys as a sacred object. The sanctuary's name, Labranda, is directly derived from this term, suggesting that it was a place where the labrys held religious importance. This interpretation casts the sanctuary not just as a geographical location but as a spiritual center dedicated to the veneration of the labrys, reinforcing its status as a potent symbol of divine or royal power in ancient Anatolia.

It is amazing how symbols and gods from different cultures came together at Labraunda. In the mountainous terrains of Caria, five kilometers west of Ortaköy, Mugla Province of modern Turkey, the labrys finds a sacred echo at this site, which is steeped in divine resonance. Here, the double-headed axe stands beside Zeus Labrandeus, a syncretic deity embodying the storm's might, a testament to the symbol's enduring sacral status. Revered along with the Olympian gods, it shows that religious and artistic traditions from Anatolia and Greece were constantly exchanging ideas and images. The presence of the labrys in this sacred milieu underscores its dynamic role as a venerated object of worship, a focal point of divine communion, and an emblem of spiritual continuity in the ancient Mediterranean tapestry.

A legendary account tells of a golden double-headed axe that held a place of honor in the Lydian capital of Sardes. King Gyges of Lydia gave the Carians this sacred labrys as a thank-you gift for their military assistance. The complexity of such an exchange underlines the ceremonial importance of the labrys, a symbol not easily relinquished or transferred between peoples. Once in the possession of the Carians, it was enshrined in the Temple of Zeus at Labranda, emphasizing its continued ritual significance.

In the city of Halicarnassus, the labrys became a numismatic emblem, frequently depicted on coinage, signaling its broader symbolic currency in Carian society. The museum in Bodrum houses coins that not only depict the familiar head of Apollo but also the esteemed figure of Zeus Labraundeus, distinguishable by the double-bladed Carian axe. This consistent iconography across various mediums and contexts, from coins to sanctuaries, denotes the profound link between the labrys and the divine, thereby weaving a thread of shared cultural and religious (and now also genetic) identity between the civilizations of the Greek mainland, Minoan Crete, and Western Anatolia.

Scholarly Discourse and Alternative Interpretations

Amidst the converging lines of historical evidence and myth, the origin and meaning of 'labyrinthos' spark ongoing scholarly debate. While the association with the labrys suggests a lineage tied to Minoan ritual spaces, other scholars cast a wider net, proposing alternatives such as a linguistic link to Greek 'laura' or even a borrowing from Carian terms. These discourses reflect the complexities and challenges inherent in unraveling the etymological threads of ancient words, with each interpretation offering a unique perspective on the intersections of language, archaeological evidence, culture, and religion. As the labrys continues to serve as a nexus for these discussions, its journey from a utilitarian axe to a profound cultural symbol encapsulates the rich spectrum of ancient Mediterranean spirituality and the scholarly pursuit to understand it.

In Aegean Prehistory, Anatolia Tags Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Nevali Cori: The Uknown Prehistoric Precursor to Göbekli Tepe's Monumental Legacy

March 26, 2024

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis


Before Göbekli Tepe: Nevali Cori as the Precursor to Göbekli Tepe's Architectural Marvels

Nestled in the fertile crescent of Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey, the archaeological site of Nevali Cori offers a captivating glimpse into the dawn of human civilization. Predating the renowned site of Göbekli Tepe, Nevali Cori's remnants from the 9th millennium BCE provide unprecedented insights into early Neolithic life, marking significant leaps in architecture, agriculture, art, and spiritual practices. This comprehensive exploration reveals how Nevali Cori not only shaped the trajectory of human history but also challenges our perceptions of ancient societies' capabilities and complexities.

©Copyright Alfred Molon

Architectural Marvels of the Neolithic Age

The architectural achievements of Nevali Cori stand as a testament to the advanced capabilities of early Neolithic societies. The site's meticulously constructed rectangular buildings, crafted from precisely cut limestone, defy previous assumptions about the era's architectural limitations. These structures, characterized by their durability and sophistication, served multifaceted roles as both dwellings and ceremonial spaces, illustrating an early integration of daily and spiritual life. The architectural designs seen at Nevali Cori, including stone pillars and terrazzo floors, highlight a sophisticated understanding of spatial organization and community planning far ahead of its time. This architectural ingenuity not only provided a foundation for future advancements in building techniques but also fostered a sense of community and cohesion among its inhabitants.

Author : Dosseman

A Proto-Göbekli Tepe

The discovery of Nevali Cori has reshaped our understanding of Neolithic progression in the region, suggesting a possible ideological and cultural continuity leading to the construction of Göbekli Tepe. The parallels in architectural styles and religious symbols between the two sites indicate that Nevali Cori might have served as an inspiration or even a precursor to the later monumental achievements at Göbekli Tepe. This connection underscores the site's significance in tracing the evolution of religious and societal structures within early human communities, providing a clearer picture of the gradual development of complex belief systems and communal identities.

The Dawn of Artistic Expression

Artistic artifacts unearthed at Nevali Cori represent some of the earliest known depictions of the human form, marking a milestone in the history of artistic expression. These statues and reliefs, with their intricate detailing and symbolic significance, offer invaluable insights into the community's spiritual beliefs, social structures, and aesthetic values. The presence of such sophisticated artistry challenges previously held notions about the artistic capabilities of Neolithic peoples, suggesting a complex understanding of human and divine representation. Through these artistic expressions, we gain a deeper appreciation for the cultural richness and intellectual depth of Nevali Cori's inhabitants.

Some figurines from Nevali Çori

From Nomads to Farmers

The evidence of agriculture at Nevali Cori signifies a monumental shift in human history from nomadic lifestyles to settled farming communities. The cultivation of wheat and barley at this site marks one of the earliest instances of agricultural practices, laying the groundwork for the development of stable communities and the eventual rise of civilizations. This transition not only altered the socio-economic fabric of Neolithic societies but also set in motion the complex dynamics of agricultural development, population growth, and urbanization that would define human progress for millennia.

Rituals and Ancestors

The ritualistic practices and ancestor veneration of Nevali Cori reveal the complex belief systems of early Neolithic communities, offering an intriguing window into their spiritual life. The site's archaeological findings, including skull fragments and other human remains, suggest rituals that underscored the community's reverence for their ancestors and the spiritual world. These practices reflect an intricate web of beliefs regarding life, death, and the cosmos, offering profound insights into the early development of religious thought and the role of ritual in fostering communal bonds and continuity.

The 'skin head' from Nevalı Çori

Nevali Cori's Enduring Legacy

As we delve deeper into the mysteries of Nevali Cori, its enduring legacy becomes increasingly apparent. This ancient site not only illuminates the ingenuity and resilience of early Neolithic societies but also serves as a beacon of innovation that influenced subsequent developments in architecture, art, agriculture, and spirituality. By exploring Nevali Cori's remarkable contributions to human history, we gain a deeper understanding of our ancestors' journey from the shadows of prehistory into the light of civilization, forever altering our perceptions of the Neolithic age and its lasting impact on the course of human development.

In Anatolia Tags Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Illustration by Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

The Multilingual Bogazköy Archive: Over 25,000 Cuneiform Tablets Containing 8 Different Languages!

November 26, 2023

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS


Exploring the Polyglot World of the Hittite Empire: The Eight Languages of the Boğazköy Tablets

The Boğazköy Archive, discovered amidst the ruins of ancient Hattusa (now Boğazköy), stands as a remarkable testament to the Hittite civilization, a dominant political force in the Middle East during the 2nd millennium B.C. This vast collection of nearly 25,000 cuneiform tablets is the primary source of our knowledge about the social, political, commercial, military, religious, legislative, and artistic facets of this era in Asia Minor and the broader Middle East.

Key Contents of the Archive

The Boğazköy tablets cover an array of subjects, from royal annals, chronicles, decrees, and treaties like the famous Treaty of Quadesh with Egypt to legal codes, mythological texts, lists of rulers, diplomatic correspondence, deeds, codes of laws, court records, mythological and religious texts, astrological predictions, Sumero-Akkado-Hittite dictionaries, and even practical guides on horse breeding. This variety provides a comprehensive view of the Hittite civilization's complexity and sophistication. The overwhelming majority of texts found in the Boğazköy archive belong to the New Hittite period (14th and 13th centuries B.C.), and only a small number of them (including the early version of the laws) go back to the 17th and 16th centuries B.C.

Lion Gate, Hatussa

Archaeological and Linguistic Significance

The discovery and ongoing study of these tablets, initiated by H. Winckler together with Greek-Ottoman archeologist Theodore Makridi Bey, from 1906 to 1912, have significantly advanced our understanding of the Hittite civilization and its interactions with neighboring cultures. The linguistic findings, in particular, have revolutionized Indo-European studies, revealing previously unknown languages and dialects within this family.

The Linguistic Landscape of the Boğazköy Archive

One of the most fascinating aspects of the Boğazköy Archive is its linguistic diversity, which encompasses texts in eight different languages. This polyglot nature highlights the cultural and political influence of the Hittite Empire.

1. Cuneiform Hittite: The role of Cuneiform Hittite in the Hittite Empire cannot be overstated. As the predominant language of the Boğazköy Archive, it offers a direct insight into the administrative, legal, and diplomatic workings of the empire. This version of the cuneiform script, adapted from the earlier Akkadian system, was a vital tool for recording laws, treaties, and royal decrees, serving as the backbone of governance and order in the Hittite state. Its use in diplomatic correspondence, especially in treaties such as the Treaty of Quadesh, underscores its significance as a language of international relations in the ancient Near East.

2. Akkadian: Serving as one of the main languages of the archive, these represent the administrative and diplomatic lingua franca of the ancient Near East. Akkadian, an ancient Semitic language, originated in Mesopotamia around 2500 BC and was extensively used for administration, diplomacy, and literature. Akkadian is divided into two major dialects: Assyrian and Babylonian. It was written using the cuneiform script and is of great historical significance, providing insights into ancient Mesopotamian civilization and culture. Akkadian's influence declined around the 1st millennium BC but left a lasting impact on subsequent languages in the region.

3. Sumerian: A dead language by 1200 B.C., Sumerian's inclusion indicates its continued scholarly significance. The ancient non-Indo-European language of the Sumerian civilization was the first to develop the cuneiform script, which, although already dead at that time, was still being taught.

4. Hurrian: Neither Indo-European nor Semitic, Hurrian reflects Mitanni's influence on the Hittite Empire. It was the language of the Land of the Mitanni, to the east of the Hittite Empire, a significant cultural and political group in the region encompassing parts of modern-day Turkey, Syria, and Iraq. The language is known from texts dating from around 2300 BC to the first century AD. Hurrian played a crucial role in the cultural and political tapestry of the area, especially in the context of its interactions with neighboring civilizations like the Hittites and Assyrians. The language's structure and vocabulary remain a subject of study for linguists, offering insights into the diverse linguistic landscape of the ancient Near East.

5. Luwian: An Anatolian Indo-European language probably spoken in western Anatolia, closely related to Hittite and possibly a precursor to Lycian. The Luwian language, part of the Anatolian branch of the Indo-European family, played a crucial role in the geopolitical dynamics between the Hittite Empire and the independent states of western Anatolia during the Bronze Age. As a language closely related to Hittite, Luwian served as a linguistic bridge, facilitating diplomatic and cultural exchanges between the Hittites and their western neighbors. The presence of Luwian in the Boğazköy Archive, especially in texts related to western regions, indicates its importance in maintaining relationships and asserting influence over these independent states. Luwian's use in regional administrative and diplomatic documents reflects its status as a regional lingua franca, essential for the negotiation of treaties, trade agreements, and alliances.

6. Palaic: Palaic, an ancient Indo-European language, was one of the lesser-known members of the Anatolian language family, alongside Hittite and Luwian. It was primarily spoken in the region of Pala in north-central Anatolia, now part of modern Turkey. Known mainly from cuneiform tablets of the Boğazköy Archive, Palaic's use seems to have been largely religious, dedicated to ritual and liturgical texts. The language provides a glimpse into the linguistic diversity of ancient Anatolia and the religious practices of its people, but much about Palaic remains obscure due to the limited number of texts available.

7. Hattic (Proto-Hittite): A non-Indo-European language, mainly used in ritual texts, offers a window into the religious practices and beliefs of the Hittites. It was primarily used by the Hattians, indigenous inhabitants of central Anatolia. Primarily known from Hittite texts where it is used in religious contexts, Hattic is distinctive for its unique vocabulary and structure, differing significantly from the surrounding Indo-European languages. Despite its limited corpus, Hattic is crucial for understanding the cultural and linguistic prehistory of Anatolia.

8. An Unidentified Language: The eighth language, which is different from the others, has not yet been precisely identified. The only evidence we have is that it contains some Indo-European terms that correspond to a treatise on equestrian art written in Hittite by Kikkuli, a Hurrian from the Land of the Mitanni. There is a possibility that this is the new Anatolian language that linguists have identified as Kalasma.

Anatolia's Linguistic Mosaic: Unraveling the Indo-European and Non-Indo-European Language Blend

The Anatolian languages, a group of now-extinct languages once spoken in ancient Anatolia, have long been shrouded in mystery, particularly to those outside the academic community. The 20th and 21st centuries witnessed a renaissance in the study of these languages, propelled by archaeological discoveries like the Boğazköy Archive. Prior to these findings, knowledge of these languages was limited and fragmented. The decipherment of cuneiform scripts and the unearthing of texts in Hittite, Luwian, and Palaic, among others, revolutionized our understanding of these ancient tongues. Linguists and historians have used comparative methods, drawing parallels with other Indo-European languages, to piece together their phonology, grammar, and vocabulary. This linguistic detective work has been augmented by advancements in technology, including digital analysis and database compilation, allowing for more nuanced and comprehensive interpretations.

Anatolian languages map

These efforts have not only shed light on the linguistic landscape of ancient Anatolia but also provided insights into the historical interactions, migrations, and cultural exchanges in the region. The study of Anatolian languages has thus transformed from a niche academic pursuit into a key component of understanding the ancient world's complexity.

In ancient Anatolia, a fascinating linguistic tapestry emerged from the mix of Indo-European and non-Indo-European languages. This region, a crossroads of cultures and peoples, featured Indo-European languages like Hittite, Luwian, and Palaic alongside non-Indo-European languages such as Hattic and Hurrian. This linguistic diversity reflects Anatolia's role as a melting pot of different civilizations, where a variety of ethnic and linguistic groups interacted, traded, and coexisted, contributing to the rich cultural and historical heritage of the area.

Cuneiform treaty between Hittite ruler Hattushili III and Ramses II, 13th cent. BCE; Pergamon Museum, Berlin

The Boğazköy Archive is not just a collection of ancient texts; it's a cultural and linguistic mosaic that gives us a detailed picture of the Hittite Empire and its interactions with the ancient world. The diversity of languages in the archive reflects the cosmopolitan nature of Hattusa, mirroring the complexity and interconnectedness of ancient civilizations. As studies continue, the archive promises to further illuminate the rich tapestry of human history and language.

In Anatolia Tags Archaeology's Greatest Finds, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

The Oldest Interlingual Inscriptions of Antiquity: Windows into Ancient Multilingualism

October 15, 2023

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS


Interlingual inscriptions—texts inscribed in multiple languages—stand as testaments to ancient multilingualism, offering unparalleled insights into cross-cultural interactions and providing scholars with the keys to unlocking long-forgotten languages.


contents

  • The Rosetta Stone

  • The Letoon Trilingual Stele

  • The Xanthian Obelisk

  • The Behistun Inscription

  • The Galle Trilingual Inscription

  • The Canopus Decree (Canopus Stone)

  • The Sardis Bilingual Inscription

  • King Ezana’s Stone

  • The Meroitic scripts of the Kingdom of Kush

  • The Pyrgi Tablets

  • The Bilingual Inscription of Kulamanu from Karatepe

  • The Idalion Bilingual


Societies have flourished and interacted throughout history, leaving behind artifacts, buildings, and inscriptions that serve as reminders of their past. Interlingual inscriptions, or texts written in multiple languages, are among the most remarkable of these. They have been used by researchers to interpret extinct languages in addition to serving as proof of ancient multilingualism. Let's examine some of the oldest and most well-known multilingual inscriptions.


1. The Rosetta Stone

Unearthed near Rosetta (Rashid) in the Nile Delta region of Egypt in 1799, the Rosetta Stone is undoubtedly one of the most famous archaeological discoveries. This granodiorite slab boasts inscriptions in three scripts: Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics, Demotic script, and Ancient Greek. With the known Ancient Greek as a reference, scholars, most notably Jean-François Champollion, were able to decipher the hieroglyphs in 1822, unraveling the mysteries of ancient Egyptian writing.


2. The Letoon Trilingual Stele

Located at the Letoon Sanctuary near the ancient city of Xanthos in present-day Turkey, the Letoon Trilingual Stele offers inscriptions in three different languages: Ancient Greek, Lycian, and Aramaic. Dating back to the 4th century BC, this inscription primarily commemorates the achievements of a local prince named Arbinas. The stele has provided scholars with crucial clues for deciphering the Lycian language.


3. The Xanthian Obelisk

Also found in the vicinity of Xanthos, the Xanthian Obelisk, or Xanthos Stele, is a tower-like monument from the 5th century BC with inscriptions in both Greek and Lycian. While less famous than the Letoon Trilingual, the obelisk was instrumental in understanding Lycian B, a variant of the Lycian language.


4. The Behistun Multilingual Inscription

A remarkable example of an ancient interlingual inscription is the Behistun Inscription, situated in modern-day Iran. Originating from the era of Darius the Great in the 5th century BC, the inscription is monumental not only in its physical presence, carved dramatically into a cliff face, but also in its linguistic significance.

The Bisotun Inscription presents texts in three different cuneiform script languages: Old Persian, Elamite, and Babylonian (a version of Akkadian). It delineates the victories of Darius the Great against the usurper Gaumāta and subsequent revolts, projecting Darius as a divinely appointed king.

The trilingual nature of the inscription was essential in deciphering cuneiform, specifically through the efforts of British army officer Sir Henry Rawlinson in the 19th century. By comparing the three parallel texts, scholars unlocked the secrets of cuneiform scripts, unleashing a deeper understanding of the various civilizations that used them. The Bisotun Inscription thus offers a vivid illustration of the pivotal role of multilingual texts in historical and linguistic research.


5. The Galle Trilingual Inscription

Erected in 1411 in Sri Lanka by the Chinese explorer Zheng He, the Galle Trilingual Inscription contains texts in three languages: Chinese, Tamil, and Persian. It commemorates the offerings made by Zheng He to a Buddhist temple and stands as an enduring testament to ancient maritime routes and cultural exchanges.

The inscription begins with invocations to Buddhist, Hindu, and Islamic deities, reflecting the religious diversity and harmonious coexistence of multiple faiths. It exemplifies the syncretism in religious and cultural practices in both the places Zheng He visited and perhaps in his own crew, illustrating the interconnectedness of ancient civilizations.

The trilingual inscription reflects the maritime prowess of the Ming Dynasty and its diplomatic interactions with various countries. Zheng He's voyages are crucial events that mark the historical silk and spice routes, highlighting the vibrant maritime trade and cultural exchanges that took place across the Indian Ocean.


6. The Canopus Decree (Canopus Stone)

Similar to the Rosetta Stone, the Canopus Decree is a stele that dates back to 238 BC. Found in the ancient Egyptian city of Canopus, the inscription features texts in both hieroglyphic and Greek. The decree praises Ptolemy III for his deeds and establishes a new cult in his honor.


7. The Sardis Bilingual Inscription

The Sardis Bilingual Inscription, dating back to the 4th century BC, is a pivotal artifact in deciphering the ancient Lydian language, similar to the role the Rosetta Stone played for Egyptian hieroglyphs. Lydian was an extinct language spoken in Lydia, modern-day Turkey, during the 1st millennium BC. The inscription, discovered in 1912 in the ancient capital of Lydia, Sardis, consists of texts in both Lydian and Aramaic languages, providing a basis for comparative analysis and eventually leading to the understanding of Lydian.

Enno Littmann was one of the pioneers in decoding the Lydian language. This discovery has had a profound impact on historical linguistics, shedding light on the socio-cultural and historical context of ancient Lydia and emphasizing the importance of bilingual inscriptions in reconstructing lost languages. The Sardis bilingual inscription serves as a bridge to the past, allowing contemporary scholars to connect with the ancient Lydians through their language and history.


8. King Ezana's Stone

King Ezana's Stone, erected in the ancient city of Axum, Ethiopia, during the 4th century CE, remains a pivotal discovery in understanding the complex matrix of language, power, and religion in the region during this era. This artifact is fascinating due to its tri-lingual nature, featuring inscriptions in Ge’ez, Sabaean, and Greek.

Ezana was the ruler of the Kingdom of Aksum, a significant trading empire that spanned territories in present-day Ethiopia and Eritrea. His reign marked a transformative period in the region’s history, notably adopting Christianity as the state religion. King Ezana’s Stone reflects this epochal shift through its inscriptions, offering a royal proclamation that underscores the ruler’s might and his newfound Christian faith.

Each of the three languages on the stone provided a means of communicating with different audiences. Greek was a lingua franca of sorts across many regions due to the prior influence of the Hellenistic world. Sabaean was included due to Axum's interactions and connections with the Sabaean kingdom across the Red Sea, and Ge’ez, being the local language, represented the language of the Axumite people.

Thus, King Ezana's Stone not only offers insights into the Axumite Kingdom’s linguistic milieu but also illustrates the potent intertwining of political power and religious conversion. Additionally, it acts as a bridge connecting different civilizations through language, providing modern scholars with a tangible link to understanding the dynamics of ancient Northeast Africa and its interactions with surrounding regions. Consequently, it is a priceless artifact in the realms of linguistics, history, and the study of early Christianization in Africa.


9. The Meroitic scripts of the Kingdom of Kush

While there was not a single inscription, the ancient African Kingdom of Kush (modern-day Sudan) used a script known as Meroitic, which appeared in both cursive and hieroglyphic forms. Occasionally, Egyptian hieroglyphs appeared alongside Meroitic texts, revealing the cultural and linguistic exchanges between ancient Egypt and Kush.


10. The Pyrgi Tablets

Discovered in the ancient Etruscan port of Pyrgi (modern Italy) in 1964, these gold leaf inscriptions from the 5th century BC provide parallel texts in Etruscan and Phoenician. They record the dedication of a temple by Thefarie Velianas, the ruler of Caere, to the Phoenician goddess Astarte.


11. The Bilingual Inscription of Kulamanu from Karatepe

Phoenician part of the inscription / photo Klaus-Peter Simon on Wikimedia Commons

This inscription, from the late 8th century BC, was discovered at the Hittite fortress of Karatepe in Turkey. It provides texts in Phoenician and Luwian hieroglyphics, celebrating the achievements of the local ruler, Azatiwada. It is known as KAI 26 and has served archaeologists as a Rosetta stone for deciphering Luwian glyphs.


12. The Idalion Bilingual

The Idalion Bilingual is a significant archaeological artifact currently housed in the British Museum. It was discovered in Cyprus and played a crucial role in deciphering the Cypriot syllabary, an ancient script used from the 11th to the 4th centuries BC. This bilingual inscription contains the same text in both the well-known Phoenician alphabet and the previously undeciphered Cypriot syllabary. It provides a parallel text in Phoenician and Greek, offering an essential resource for historians and linguists seeking to comprehend the linguistic and political landscapes of ancient Cyprus.

The discovery of the Idalion Bilingual allowed scholars to decode the Cypriot syllabary by comparing corresponding words and phrases in both scripts. This breakthrough had profound implications, shedding light on ancient Cypriot history, culture, and language. It provided insights into religious practices, administrative systems, economic activities, and the linguistic evolution of the region. The Idalion Bilingual serves as a testament to the power of archaeology in unraveling the mysteries of the past and underscores the interconnectedness of human societies.

Legacy of Linguistic Bridges: The Timeless Significance of Interlingual Inscriptions

The abundance of multilingual inscriptions that have been found all across the world indicates how cosmopolitan the ancient world was. They are essential to our comprehension of linguistic evolution and historic diplomatic ties, and they emphasize the importance of cultural and linguistic interaction across civilizations. By spanning languages and civilizations, these inscriptions shed light on the universal human experience throughout time and space.


references

  1. The Rosetta Stone

    "The Rosetta Stone," by E.A. Wallis Budge, 1989

  2. The Letoon Trilingual Stele

    "Lycia: History, Monuments, and Inscriptions," by G. E. Bean, 1968

  3. The Xanthian Obelisk

    "The Lycians in Literary and Epigraphic Sources," by M. Z. Çalışkan, 1988

  4. The Behistun Inscription

    1. "The Behistun Inscription of Darius the Great: Babylonian Version," by L. W. King, R. C. Thompson, 1907

    2. "Darius I and the Persian Empire," by Hywel Clifford, 2016

  5. The Galle Trilingual Inscription

    "Zheng He's Maritime Voyages (1405–1433) and China's Relations with the Indian Ocean World: A Multilingual Bibliography," by Roderich Ptak, 2014

  6. The Canopus Decree (Canopus Stone)

    1. "The Decree of Canopus: In Hieroglyphics and Greek, with Translations and an explanation of the hieroglyphical Characters," by S. Birch, 1866

    2. "Ptolemaic Egypt," by Jean Bingen, 2007

  7. The Sardis Bilingual Inscription

    "Aramaic Inscriptions and Documents of the Roman Period," By Joseph Naveh (2003)

  8. King Ezana’s Stone

    "Ancient Ethiopia," by David W. Phillipson (2009)

  9. The Meroitic scripts of the Kingdom of Kush

    "Meroe City: An Ancient African Capital," by P. L. Shinnie, 1996

  10. The Pyrgi Tablets

    "The Etruscan Language: An Introduction," by Giuliano and Larissa Bonfante, 2002

  11. The Bilingual Inscription of Kulamanu from Karatepe

    "The Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions of the Iron Age," by Annick Payne, 2012.

In Anatolia Tags Archaeology's Greatest Finds, History, The Archaeologist Editorial Group, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Illustration by Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

The Sardis Bilingual Inscription: The "Rosetta Stone" of the Lydian Language

October 15, 2023

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis


In the historical conundrum of deciphering ancient languages, a singular artifact often emerges as the key, illuminating the path toward understanding the words of ancient civilizations. For the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, the Rosetta Stone performed this pivotal role, revealing the secret of a once-lost language. Likewise, in the pursuit of comprehending the ancient Lydian language, a specific artifact—the Sardis bilingual inscription—has proven indispensable.

Background on Lydian Language and Sardis

Lydian is an extinct language that was spoken in the region of Lydia, in western Anatolia (modern-day Turkey), during the 1st millennium BC. The Lydian civilization thrived in a period that was rich in cultural exchange, economic developments, and political intrigue. Their language, written in a unique script, remained a historical mystery for centuries due to the scarcity of comprehensive linguistic material available for study.

Sardis, the ancient capital of Lydia, where lush landscapes met burgeoning urbanization, played a significant role in unlocking the enigma of the Lydian language. The city harbored an array of inscriptions, but the Sardis bilingual inscription is particularly notable due to its crucial role in decoding the language.

The Discovery of the Sardis Bilingual Inscription

The Sardis bilingual inscription, a remarkable artifact from the 4th century BC, stands as a testament to ancient linguistic exploration. This Lydian-Aramaic funerary inscription was serendipitously unearthed in 1912 during an excavation conducted by the American Society for the Excavation of Sardis.

This remarkable find proved to be the equivalent of the "Rosetta Stone" for unlocking the mysteries of the Lydian language, a monumental breakthrough in the field of linguistics. The inscription begins with an Aramaic script and meticulously records the date as the tenth year of Artaxerxes, believed to be Artaxerxes II, placing its creation in the year 394 BC. This date is a crucial anchor for historians and scholars studying this period of history.

Today, the Sardis bilingual inscription is housed in the İzmir Archaeology Museum, where it continues to captivate visitors with its historical significance. This Aramaic inscription is cataloged as KAI 260, and its comprehensive analysis was first presented to the world in 1917 by the eminent scholar Stanley Arthur Cook.

Interestingly, the inscription was discovered in a secondary location, having been repurposed during the Greek or Roman era as a building material for a robust, low wall. This wall once graced the northern slope of the Nekropolis hill, situated to the west of the Paktolos River. Alongside this bilingual marvel, several other inscriptions were discovered, hinting at the rich tapestry of history woven into this ancient site.

This artifact, inscribed with texts in both Lydian and Aramaic languages, offered a unique comparative tool for scholars aiming to decrypt the mysterious Lydian script. Unlike Lydian, Aramaic was relatively well understood by researchers, thereby providing a comparative basis to tease apart the intricacies of the Lydian language.

Decrypting the Lydian Language

A person named Enno Littmann figured out how to understand the Lydian language by studying these writings. He looked at the two versions of the text, found the letters they used, learned some basic words, tried to translate some sentences, explained how Lydian words worked, and even noticed that some of the writings had special poetry.

Eight years later, another person named William Hepburn Buckler found 51 more of these special writings. By 1986, there were 109 of them, and a person named Roberto Gusmani studied them in detail. People still find new writings like these from time to time.

Most of the Lydian writings were discovered in or around a place called Sardis, which was the capital of Lydia. However, there are not many long writings. Most of them are just a few words or incomplete. These writings are often on materials like marble or stone, and they usually have to do with burials. Some of them are like official statements, and a few seem to be poems with a special way of writing.

The writings on tombs often start with the words "this grave." The shorter writings are usually things like drawings on walls, words on coins, seals, marks from pottery, and similar things. Sometimes, the words of a Greek poet named Hipponax from a long time ago are mixed with the Lydian words, especially the slang words that people used.

Enno Littmann: A Pioneer in Oriental Studies and Exploration

Enno Littmann (1875–1958) was a distinguished German orientalist known for his significant contributions to oriental studies. He held prominent academic positions at various universities, including Strasbourg, Göttingen, Bonn, and Tübingen. Littmann's work encompassed deciphering inscriptions in ancient languages like Palmyrene and Nabataean, as well as translating historical texts from ancient Ethiopian monuments. Notably, he translated "One Thousand and One Nights" into German. Littmann's scholarly pursuits were complemented by his adventurous spirit, leading him to explore and immerse himself in cultures such as the Tigre people in Eritrea and the Aksum expedition in Ethiopia. His legacy continues to impact the fields of linguistics, translation, and cultural understanding.

The Impact on Historical Linguistics and Studies

The Sardis bilingual inscription has significantly impacted historical linguistics and the study of ancient Anatolian civilizations. By unlocking the Lydian language, researchers have gained access to a wealth of information, not only linguistically but also with respect to the socio-cultural, economic, and political contexts of ancient Lydia. This has enabled scholars to reconstruct aspects of Lydian civilization, enhancing our understanding of their society, belief systems, and interactions with neighboring civilizations.

Furthermore, the successful deciphering of the Lydian language has broader implications for the field of historical linguistics. It exemplifies the significance of bilingual inscriptions in the reconstruction of lost languages and underlines the interconnectedness of ancient civilizations through language and writing.

In conclusion, the Sardis bilingual inscription is a luminous testament to the rich, complex history embedded in the language and script of ancient civilizations. Much like the famed Rosetta Stone, it has forged a linguistic bridge to the past, allowing contemporary scholars to converse with ancient Lydians through the remnants of their language. The Sardis bilingual inscription not only unraveled the mysteries of the Lydian language but also brought to light the potent capabilities of linguistic detective work in the continual quest to comprehend our multifaceted historical tapestry.

In Anatolia Tags Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

The Rich Tapestry of Ancient Anatolian Languages

October 15, 2023

By The Archaeologist Editor Group


Anatolia, or Asia Minor, boasts a complex linguistic history, with its landscapes sown by numerous cultures and empires over millennia. From the Hittites to the Phrygians, this vast peninsula has been a cradle of myriad languages, some of which are Indo-European, while others hail from different linguistic families. Here’s a journey through the ancient languages of Anatolian cultures known until now.

Hattic

Antecedent to the Hittites in Anatolia were the Hatti, speaking a language we now refer to as Hattic. Hattic was maybe a non-Indo-European language and is known to us primarily through Hittite texts, where it was preserved in religious and cultic contexts. The Hittites, upon establishing themselves in Anatolia, seemingly absorbed various aspects of Hattic culture and religion, venerating Hattic deities and maintaining Hattic rituals. The language itself is known from a plethora of Hittite texts, which contain Hattic loanwords and phrases. Though Hattic was eventually eclipsed by the Indo-European Hittite language, its impact lingered in Hittite religious practice and nomenclature.

Hittite

The Hittites inhabited Anatolia from the 18th to the 12th centuries BCE, establishing a formidable empire in the region. Their language, Hittite, belonging to the Indo-European family, has been deciphered from the abundant cuneiform tablets found at the capital, Hattusa. This language provided early linguists with one of the first glimpses into the Indo-European linguistic past due to its conservative characteristics.

Luwian

Luwian was another significant language in ancient Anatolia, spoken by the Luwians, who occupied southern and western Anatolia. Luwian was inscribed in both cuneiform and an indigenous hieroglyphic script. It was contemporaneous with Hittite and was also an Indo-European language, yet it outlived Hittite, playing a pivotal role in the post-Hittite era.

The Sultanhan monument is a stele with Luwian hieroglyphic inscription; found at Sultanhan; Museum of Anatolian Civilizations, Ankara, Turkey

Palaic

Palaic was spoken in the northern region of Anatolia and is known from tablets found in the Hittite capital, indicating it was preserved for liturgical purposes. While Palaic is also of the Indo-European lineage, it is scantily attested, thus shrouding many aspects of this language in mystery.

Lydian

In western Anatolia, the Kingdom of Lydia flourished from the 15th to the 6th century BCE. Lydian, an Indo-European language, was utilized by the Lydians and is primarily known from funerary inscriptions. Notably, Lydia was renowned for its innovations in economic systems, being among the first to utilize coinage.

The Sardis bilingual inscription was the "Rosetta Stone" for the Lydian language.

Lycian

Lycia, on the southern coast of Anatolia, birthed the Lycian language, another member of the Indo-European family. Lycian is known from a number of inscriptions, revealing a society that operated a unique federation system, which is often alluded to in its texts.

Phrygian

The Phrygians, originating from the Balkans, made their home in central Anatolia and spoke Phrygian. It is an Indo-European language and has a fair amount of inscriptions that illuminate aspects of Phrygian culture, mythology, and religious practices.

Urartian

Urartu, in the eastern part of Anatolia, spoke Urartian, a language that was not part of the Indo-European family. Instead, it belonged to the Hurro-Urartian family. Urartian is known from numerous inscriptions that provide a lens into the lives, wars, and religious beliefs of the Urartians.

Carian

The Carians, who occupied the southwestern part of Anatolia, spoke Carian, a language that still puzzles linguists due to its elusive features. While considered to be part of the Anatolian subgroup of Indo-European languages, much about Carian remains to be uncovered.

Hans van Deukeren - Own work

Map showing locations where inscriptions in the Carian language have been found, in Caria proper, Egypt, or Mainland Greece. Map is based on data in I.J. Adiego, The Carian Language (Handbuch der Orientalistik) (2007).

Kashkian

The enigma that is Kashkian remains shrouded in mystery to this day. The Kashka people, believed to have lived in northern Anatolia, were persistent adversaries of the Hittite Empire. In the Hittite annals, the Kashka are frequently referenced as troublesome neighbors, perpetually launching incursions into Hittite territory. However, little is known about their language, Kashkian, due to the scarcity of direct textual evidence. The Kashkian language and its possible affiliation with any known language family, including Kartvelian, remain speculative and unclear. Many aspects of their language and culture remain speculative and hinge on future archaeological and linguistic discoveries.

Pisidian

Pisidia, situated in the mountainous region of southern Anatolia, housed a myriad of ancient cities like Termessos and Sagalassos. Pisidian, the language of this region, is relatively obscure, owing to the limited corpus of inscriptions. The inscriptions we do possess are often bilingual, offering texts in both Greek and Pisidian, which has facilitated partial understanding. Notwithstanding, Pisidian remains an elusive language. Its classification is still a matter of debate among scholars, with theories vacillating between affiliations with the Hittite-Luwian subgroup and those with the wider Anatolian language family. The understanding of Pisidian culture and language might significantly benefit from further research and archaeological findings.

Anatolia has been a vibrant mosaic of languages and cultures throughout history, bridging the East and the West. While many aspects of these ancient languages have been deciphered, countless mysteries still slumber beneath the Anatolian soil, waiting to be unearthed and explored. This rich and varied linguistic history underscores the diverse array of peoples and societies that have called Anatolia home, each contributing threads to the intricate tapestry of its historical narrative.

In Anatolia Tags Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Who Were The Pelasgians? (Pre-Historic People of Greece)

September 28, 2023

Unraveling the Enigma of Pre-Historic Greece

The ancient world, with its myriad cultures and mysterious pasts, has long captivated the imagination of historians and archaeologists alike. Among the many enigmatic groups that pepper the landscape of antiquity, few are as intriguing and elusive as the Pelasgians. Their story is woven into the very fabric of Greek history, emerging as a shadowy precursor to the luminous dawn of classical Greek civilization.

They are perceptible throughout a vast amount of time and space in the ancient Aegean world, but due to the passing of time and the subsequent dominance of Hellenic culture, they are still largely a mystery. Described variously by classical authors as the original inhabitants of Greece, their story is a tapestry of myth, legend, and fragmented historical accounts.

In exploring the Pelasgian enigma, one encounters a labyrinth of questions regarding their origins, language, and culture. Were they the first settlers of the Greek mainland, or a diverse group of indigenous people unified under a Greek nomenclature? Did they speak a language that was an antecedent to Greek or something entirely distinct? Theories abound, but answers are fleeting, like chasing shadows in the dim light of early dawn.

Origins and Identity

The term "Pelasgians" (Ancient Greek: Πελασγοί) primarily referred to the indigenous populations of Greece before the Hellenic era. According to historian Peter Green, this broad designation suggests a diverse and ancient group that predated and possibly influenced early Greek culture.

A lack of conclusive archaeological evidence and unambiguous historical records in antiquity obscures the origins and identity of the Pelasgians. They are often described as the autochthonous people of Greece, predating the arrival of Hellenic tribes. Ancient Greek writers variably portrayed them as ancestors or contemporaries of the early Greeks, possibly inhabiting regions across Greece, the Aegean islands, and parts of Anatolia.

The statements regarding the Pelasgians having lived in the Aegean region before the arrival of the Greeks are intriguing but not entirely supported by current scholarly consensus or scientific evidence. Addressing these assertions requires a careful examination of historical, archaeological, and linguistic evidence.

The consensus is that the Pelasgians were indeed a pre-Hellenic people inhabiting parts of Greece, the Aegean, and possibly other regions. However, the extent to which they were genetically related to the ancient Greeks, Thracians, and Illyrians is not definitively established. Genetic studies have advanced our understanding of ancient populations, but they do not yet provide conclusive evidence about the specific relationships between these groups.

Etymology and Mythology

The etymology of "Pelasgian" is shrouded in uncertainty. The Ancient Greeks linked the term to 'pelargos' (stork), suggesting a migratory origin. Another theory relates 'pelas' to 'near' or 'neighboring land'. Mythologically, the Pelasgians are often connected to the foundational myths of Greek culture. Pelasgus, a figure in Greek mythology, is sometimes considered their eponymous ancestor, often depicted as a primitive, earth-born king, reinforcing their image as the original inhabitants of the Greek lands.

A.J. Van Windekens, a prominent linguist and philologist, contributed significantly to the study of Indo-European languages and their etymology. In his exploration of the ethnonym "Pelasgos," Van Windekens proposed an intriguing etymology that diverges from more traditional interpretations.

According to Van Windekens, the name "Pelasgos" could be derived from an Indo-European root, which he posited as *bhelosgho-s. This root, in his interpretation, translates to "blooming branch" or something akin to it. This suggestion is perhaps quite poetic and symbolic, implying a connection to growth, fertility, or perhaps a flourishing civilization. On the other hand, this etymology may connect the Pelasgians with the Neolithic inhabitants of Greece. This is a fascinating topic that intertwines linguistic analysis with archaeological and historical evidence. Some scholars contend that the Pelasgians represent this pivotal period in Greek prehistory, which was characterized by significant agricultural advancements and the shift from nomadic to settled lifestyles. This hypothesis positions the Pelasgians as pivotal in the dawn of agriculture and settled civilization in ancient Greece, yet the lack of definitive evidence keeps their story enigmatic and largely interpretive.

Linguistic and Cultural Aspects

Linguistically, the Pelasgians are a conundrum. Greek sources described their language as 'barbarian', implying it was non-Greek, yet its specifics remain unknown. This has led to speculation that the Pelasgians spoke a pre-Indo-European language, or possibly a variety of languages reflecting their widespread geographical distribution. Culturally, they are thought to have influenced the developing Greek culture, with some Greek practices and deities possibly having Pelasgian origins. Their language remains a topic of extensive speculation, with various theories suggesting connections to Indo-European, Anatolian, or even non-Indo-European roots.

Regarding the influence of Anatolian languages on Greek, there is evidence of cultural and linguistic exchanges across the Aegean in the ancient world. However, the exact nature and extent of these influences, particularly regarding the development of Greek language and culture, are still subjects of ongoing research and debate.

Archaeological Evidence

Archaeological evidence regarding the Pelasgians is sparse and often indirect. Excavations in regions traditionally associated with them, like Lemnos, Thessaly, and Attica, have unearthed settlements and artifacts suggesting a Neolithic presence. However, unequivocally linking these findings to the Pelasgians is challenging, primarily due to the absence of inscriptions or distinct cultural markers that can be conclusively attributed to them.

Literary References

Literary references to the Pelasgians are found in the works of Homer, Herodotus, Thucydides, and other ancient authors. These accounts are often ambiguous and contradictory, sometimes describing the Pelasgians as barbaric, other times as Greeks. They are mentioned in various contexts, including their participation in the Trojan War and their widespread settlements across the Aegean region.

The paradox of the Pelasgians lies in their simultaneous omnipresence and obscurity in ancient Greek records. They are everywhere and nowhere, a people whose absence is just as important as their presence, according to Homer, Herodotus, and scholars throughout history. Their role in the formation of Greek identity, their linguistic contributions, and their cultural practices are subjects of ongoing academic debate and fascination.

DNA Evidence and the Pelasgian-Anatolian Connection in the Aegean Neolithic Tapestry

Finding Neolithic DNA in the Greek mainland, Crete, and Anatolia shows a link between the Pelasgians and people from Anatolia. This is an interesting mix of archaeogenetics, linguistics, and cultural history that sheds light on the complex web of ancient civilizations in the Aegean and Near Eastern areas.

The discovery of similar Neolithic DNA across regions inhabited by these ancient groups suggests a significant level of genetic continuity that spans across geographical boundaries. This genetic similarity indicates that the populations on the Helladic mainland, Crete, and Anatolia shared common ancestors during the Neolithic period, highlighting a deeper prehistoric connection that predates the emergence of distinct cultural and linguistic identities known from later historical periods.

Turning to Colin Renfrew's Anatolian hypothesis, it postulates that Anatolia was the place where Indo-European languages first spread during the Neolithic era. This theory aligns with the genetic evidence of shared ancestries, suggesting that as Neolithic farmers from Anatolia migrated into Europe, they brought with them the proto-Indo-European language, which would later diversify into various language families, including Greek. If the Pelasgians were indeed part of this widespread Neolithic population, as suggested by the genetic evidence, it could imply that they were either speakers of a proto-Indo-European language or were influenced by the linguistic changes brought about by these migrations.

Furthermore, the concept of a pre-Greek linguistic substrate refers to the influence of non-Greek, possibly indigenous, languages on the Greek language as it developed. The presence of non-Indo-European or proto-Indo-European elements in Greek, some of which might be traced back to the Pelasgian language (if it indeed was distinct from Greek), could be a remnant of these early linguistic interactions. This substrate could potentially be linked to the languages spoken in Anatolia, reflecting a complex web of cultural and linguistic exchanges over millennia.

Neolithic DNA evidence shows that the Pelasgians and Anatolian people had genetic, cultural, and linguistic links. These links suggest that these ancient groups were connected and interacted with each other. The Anatolian hypothesis and the idea of a pre-Greek linguistic substrate make for a strong framework for understanding these connections. They suggest that the roots of ancient Greek civilization and Indo-European languages may be much more connected to their Neolithic ancestors in Anatolia than was previously thought. These findings not only challenge our understanding of ancient ethnic and linguistic identities but also highlight the fluid and interconnected nature of human societies in the ancient world.

Theories and Speculations

The lack of concrete information has led to various theories and speculations about the Pelasgians. These range from considering them the bearers of a pre-Greek, possibly Anatolian or Thracian culture, to theories proposing them as a branch of the wider Indo-European family. Some modern scholars view them as a cultural and linguistic conglomerate, representing the diverse ethnic and linguistic landscape of the pre-Hellenic Aegean and Balkan regions.

In conclusion, the Pelasgians, as elusive as they are intriguing, represent a pivotal piece in the puzzle of ancient Mediterranean civilizations. Their study offers a fascinating glimpse into the complexities of cultural identity, linguistic evolution, and historical interpretation in one of the most historically significant regions of the ancient world.

In Aegean Prehistory, Anatolia Tags History, D

Illustration by Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Apaliunas to Apollo: Anatolian Roots of a Greek God?

August 25, 2023

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis


The pantheon of Ancient Greece, rich and diverse, is an amalgamation of indigenous myths interwoven with foreign influences. One of the most profound influences on early Greek religion and mythology was the older civilizations of Anatolia (the modern-day region of Asia Minor, Turkey). A striking testament to this intricate web of cultural transmission is the evolution of Apollo, one of the paramount deities of the Greeks. The origins of Apollo, it appears, lie not on the slopes of Mount Olympus but in the ancient cities of Anatolia, particularly in the deity known as Apaliunas.

Appaliunas: An Anatolian Deity

Within the annals of the Hittite archives, a name surfaces that resonates with scholars and enthusiasts of Greek mythology: Apaliunas. This deity was associated with the city of Wilusa, which many scholars identify with the legendary city of Troy (or Ilios in Greek). Apaliunas is explicitly mentioned in a Hittite letter, drawing a clear link between the Anatolian god and what would become one of Greece's most revered deities.

Proto-Forms and Linguistic Evolution

The name "Apaliunas" bears phonetic resemblances to "Apollo," and the linguistic transition from the former to the latter isn't far-fetched when considering the natural evolution of languages and the amalgamation of cultures. This is especially plausible given the close proximity and interactions between the Aegean world and Anatolia.

Homeric Epithet: Λυκηγενης (Lykegenes)

Further cementing the Anatolian connection is Apollo's Homeric epithet Λυκηγενης, which translates to "born in Lycia." Lycia was a region in Anatolia, and this epithet offers a clear geographic link to Apollo's origins. The fact that such an epithet exists and is attached to Apollo underscores the weight of the argument that Apollo's veneration was brought to Greece from Anatolian traditions.

Family Ties: Leto and Artemis

Further reinforcing the Anatolian connection is the background of Apollo's family. His mother, Leto, and twin sister, Artemis, both have strong associations with Anatolia. Leto, known as Lato in Lycian inscriptions, had her primary cult center in Lycia. The ties of Artemis to the region are evident as well, especially with the grand Temple of Artemis at Ephesus, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.

The tale of Apaliunas and his transformation into Apollo serves as a powerful testament to the intercultural exchanges of ancient times. As civilizations rose, fell, and interacted, their gods, myths, and rituals merged, evolved, and took on new forms. Apollo's Anatolian roots remind us that even the mightiest of gods have diverse origins and histories, shaped by the ebb and flow of cultures and peoples. It is a testament to the universality of human experiences and beliefs and the intrinsic need to understand the divine.

In Aegean Prehistory, Anatolia Tags Religion, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

The Search of Priam's Treasure: Where is the ancient city of Troy?

August 23, 2023

BY THE ARCHAEOLOGIST GROUP


Revealing the Secrets of Troy's Golden Age

For a long time, the ruins of Troy have been considered one of the most mysterious and fascinating locations from antiquity. It was in this city, in what is now Turkey, that Homer set the events of the Iliad, one of the most well-known and enduring myths of Western civilization. However, for centuries, academics discounted Troy as little more than a myth, a story conjured up by creative writers. The city's existence and importance were not verified until the nineteenth century, after centuries of speculation.

Heinrich Schliemann, a German archaeologist, traveled to Turkey in 1868 with the firm belief that he would discover the legendary city of Troy, site of the Iliad's battles and other events. It took him years of searching, but he finally found the hill on which he said Troy stood: Hisarlik. His find made waves in the academic community, and subsequent excavations uncovered some of history's most intriguing and puzzling artifacts.

READ ALSO

The defensive walls of Troy, which were constructed in several stages over time, were one of the most important structures uncovered in the city. These fortifications were physical reminders of the city's troubled past, which included repeated sieges and assaults by foreign armies. In addition to revealing the city's strategic importance as a hub of ancient trade and commerce, the walls also provided a wealth of information about the city's architecture and engineering.

Schliemann also claimed to have discovered the "Treasure of Priam" in Troy, a hoard of precious metals. It was thought that the treasure, which included elaborate jewelry, was the same one that Homer describes as King Priam's in the Iliad. For decades, scholars have argued over whether or not the treasure is real; some believe Schliemann may have planted it to increase the mystery surrounding his find.

READ ALSO

Also contributing to Troy's enduring allure are the city's myths and legends. The beautiful Helen of Troy, who was taken by the Trojan prince Paris, sparked a brutal and bloody war between the Trojans and the Greeks, according to the Iliad. After ten years, the Greeks finally broke through the city walls using the legendary Trojan Horse and defeated the Trojans. For centuries, audiences have been captivated by tales of the Trojan War, which have been retold and reimagined in various forms of art and literature.

Trojan mythology and legends only scratch the surface of the enigmas that surround the city of Troy. Many aspects of the city's history and significance, such as its beginnings and the causes of its decline, are still hotly contested among historians. Some historians date the city's inception to as early as 3000 BCE, while others put it firmly in the 12th century BCE. Some scholars believe that war was responsible for the city's destruction, while others believe that natural disasters or other factors were to blame.

READ ALSO

Even though there are still many questions about Troy that have yet to be answered, the city is still considered a major historical landmark. Its importance as a center of trade and commerce has added to our understanding of the ancient world, and its history and mythology continue to inspire and fascinate people today. The finding of Troy paved the way for the exploration and discovery of other ancient sites all over the world and contributed to the legitimacy and respectability of archaeology as a discipline.

There are many debates and questions that haven't been settled regarding the history of the city of Troy. The history and ultimate fate of this ancient city continue to be shrouded in mystery, despite numerous discoveries and theories. We may one day learn the reality behind the tales of Troy if new theories are proven correct and more archaeological sites are explored. The city is still a mystery that begs to be solved and discovered.

In Anatolia

Illustration by Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Who Were the Trojans: Anatolian Civilization or Part of the Mycenaean Greek World?

August 21, 2023

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis


The question of the Trojans' ethnicity and cultural affiliations is indeed intriguing and has been the subject of much debate, especially as archaeological and linguistic discoveries in the late 20th and early 21st centuries have shed more light on ancient Anatolia.

  • Geography and Historical Context:

Troy (Ilion or Ilios) was located in the northwest of modern-day Turkey near the Dardanelles Strait. This location made it part of the broader Anatolian cultural sphere rather than the Greek mainland. While the city's position gave it significant strategic and commercial importance, especially for controlling the passage between the Aegean Sea and the Black Sea, it also made it distinct from the Greek city-states to its west.

  • The Luwian Cultural Sphere:

Recent archaeological findings and the decipherment of ancient Anatolian scripts have revealed the presence of a broader "Luwian" civilization in western Anatolia during the Late Bronze Age. The Luwians are known to have used a hieroglyphic script, and their influence extended through much of western Anatolia, possibly including the region around Troy.

  • Linguistic Evidence:

While Ancient Greek was an Indo-European language, so too were the languages of the Hittites and Luwians in Anatolia. However, they belonged to different branches of the Indo-European family. The Hittite language is part of the Anatolian branch, while Luwian, closely related to Hittite, has its own dialects and is spoken in various regions of Anatolia. There's still debate about the exact language spoken in Troy, but it's generally believed to have been closer to these Anatolian languages than to Greek.

  • Archaeological Evidence:

Excavations of Troy, most notably by Heinrich Schliemann in the late 19th century and later by Manfred Korfmann in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, have shown cultural connections with the broader Anatolian region. While there were also connections with the Mycenaean world (which could be expected given its trade and strategic position), the city's artifacts, architecture, and practices display characteristics distinct from those of the Mycenaean Greeks.

The “Luwian Seal,” with Hittite markings, lending credence to Troy’s Anatolian roots. The Troy Excavation Archive, Canakkale

  • Historical Texts:

The primary source for the story of the Trojan War is Homer's epics, the "Iliad" and the "Odyssey". In these, the Trojans are consistently portrayed as distinct from the Achaeans (Greeks). They have different gods favoring them (even though they were from the same Greek Pantheon at the time when the Iliad was written, Apollo seems to have Anatolian origins), different heroes, and different cultural practices. While one shouldn't read Homer as a straightforward historical account, the consistent distinction drawn between Greeks and Trojans indicates a cultural memory of the Trojans as a different people.

Within the annals of the Hittite archives, a name surfaces that resonates with scholars and enthusiasts of Greek mythology: Appaliunas. This deity was associated with the city of Wilusa, which many scholars identify with the legendary city of Troy (or Ilios in Greek). Appaliunas is explicitly mentioned in a Hittite letter, drawing a clear link between the Anatolian god and what would become one of Greece's most revered deities, Apollo.

Further cementing the Anatolian connection is Apollo's Homeric epithet ‘Lykegenes’, which translates to "born in Lycia." Lycia was a region in Anatolia, and this epithet offers a clear geographic link to Apollo's origins. The fact that such an epithet exists and is attached to Apollo underscores the weight of the argument that Apollo's veneration was brought to Greece from Anatolian traditions.

  • Diplomatic Relations:

Texts from the Hittite Empire, another major Anatolian power, mention a city named "Wilusa," which many scholars now identify with Ilion (Troy). The Hittite texts describe diplomatic relations and treaties with Wilusa, indicating its significance in the Anatolian geopolitical landscape.

While the Trojans certainly had interactions with the Mycenaean Greeks, and there were undoubtedly cultural and trade exchanges between them, the prevailing evidence suggests that the Trojans were more closely related to the Anatolian cultural and linguistic milieu, particularly the Luwian sphere, than to the Mycenaean Greeks.

In Aegean Prehistory, Anatolia Tags History, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Illustration by Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

A Mycenaean Type Sword in Hattusha?: Evidence of Technological Exchange or Military Conflicts in the Late Bronze Age?

August 5, 2023

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS


Bronze Age Crossroads: Blades of the Aegean in Hittite Halls and the Intersection of Anatolian and Mycenaean Cultures

The Late Bronze Age witnessed a flourishing of cultural exchange and technological advancements across the ancient world. One of the most intriguing findings during this period was the discovery of Aegean-type swords in Anatolia. These exceptional weapons not only reveal the artistry and craftsmanship of ancient societies but also shed light on the extent of trade and cultural interactions in the ancient Mediterranean. Among the remarkable discoveries of Aegean-type swords is the one at Hattuša, the ancient capital of the Hittite Empire. This article explores the significance of these swords and examines the written sources that attest to the exchange of technology during this era.

A map illustrating the aftermath of the 15th century BCE ruinous campaigns by the Old Hittite Empire that led to the emergence of new powerful entities in the ancient Near East - the Middle Babylonian Kingdom of the Kassites, the Mitanni kingdom of the Hurrians, the Middle Hittite Kingdom and the Kingdom of Elam. Meanwhile, the Egyptian New Kingdom succeeded in extending its dominance as far as the southern Levant.


by
Simeon Netchev

Aegean-Type Swords: Characteristics and Significance

Aegean-type swords are a distinct category of weapons that originated in the Aegean region, particularly during the Late Bronze Age (circa 1600–1200 BCE). These swords are characterized by their distinctive hilt and blade designs, making them easily recognizable. They typically have a straight, double-edged blade that tapers to a point, making them efficient for thrusting and slashing motions in combat. The hilt often featured a prominent pommel and a guard, and was designed for a secure grip and comfort during use. The distinctive pommel at the end of the hilt, adding balance to the weapon and facilitating precise handling. Additionally, some swords had a guard, a crossbar between the hilt and the blade, which protected the wielder's hand during combat, while the blade was typically crafted with a midrib, providing structural reinforcement and enhancing the weapon's efficiency.

Aegean-type swords were primarily made of bronze, a durable and valuable metal during the Bronze Age. Bronze was a significant technological advancement of the time, and its widespread use in weaponry marked a transition from the earlier Copper Age.

The production of Aegean-type swords demonstrated a high level of metalworking skill and craftsmanship. The ability to cast, forge, and shape bronze into finely crafted weapons was a testament to the technological expertise of ancient societies. This knowledge was likely passed down through generations and shared through trade and cultural interactions.

The distribution of Aegean-type swords throughout the Aegean region and beyond indicates extensive trade and cultural contacts during the Late Bronze Age. The exchange of goods and ideas between different civilizations fostered a vibrant cultural milieu and likely played a crucial role in the advancement of various societies.

These swords were not merely weapons of war but also objects of prestige and diplomacy. The possession and display of finely crafted swords could serve as symbols of power, authority, and wealth for rulers and elite individuals. Additionally, Aegean-type swords might have been exchanged as diplomatic gifts between rulers of different regions, strengthening political alliances and diplomatic ties.

A very useful summary table of the Achaean B Type swords has been made by Professor Kirk Spencer from the Sword Forum International

The design and features of Aegean-type swords had a lasting impact on the development of later sword types. As trade and cultural exchanges continued over time, elements of these swords likely influenced the designs of other weapons in different regions, showcasing the far-reaching consequences of technological exchange.

The appearance of Aegean-type swords in Anatolia, a region that encompasses modern-day Turkey, has piqued the interest of archaeologists and historians alike. The presence of these swords points to intricate networks of trade, cultural exchange or military conflicts that connected the Aegean world with the civilizations of Anatolia.

The Aegean-Type Sword Found at Hattuša

Among the significant discoveries of Aegean-type swords, the find at Hattuša stands out as a remarkable example. Hattuša, located in central Anatolia, was the political and cultural center of the Hittite Empire during the Late Bronze Age. Two grader digger operators in Hattuša, the capital of the Hittites, one of the biggest empires of the period, by chance discovered the sword in 1991, which has no other example in the world.

The sword likely dates to the LHII period and is of Mycenaean provenance, type B. The sword, which caused great excitement when it was found, was presented to the god as an offering by the Hittite king at that time.

This bronze sword had an Akkadian inscription. It read:

"When the great king Tudhaliya destroyed the land of Assuwa, he offered this sword as an offering to his lord the storm god.”"

After defeating the Assuwa Confederation, which encompassed the Lands of [L]ugga, Karakisa, Wilusiya, and Taruisa, Tudhaliya II probably devoted it to Hattuša.

The discovery of this Aegean-type sword in the heart of the Hittite Empire raised intriguing questions about the nature of interactions between the Hittites and other contemporary civilizations. It suggested that trade and cultural exchange were far more extensive and sophisticated than previously thought. The presence of the sword also hinted at possible diplomatic relations, alliances, or even military conflicts between the Hittites and the Aegean societies.

Further Mycenaean Finds in Anatolia: A Deeper Connection

Beyond the fascinating discovery of this Aegean-type sword in Hattuša, other Mycenaean artifacts found in Anatolia further illuminate the robust connection between these two ancient civilizations. A significant number of Mycenaean pottery shards have been discovered in various parts of western Anatolia. These ceramic pieces, often decorated with distinctive patterns and motifs, have been vital in corroborating the presence of Mycenaean influence in the region.

Two more swords of Mycenaean type were discovered in Izmir and Kastamonu/Kashtama, but were most likely made in Anatolia. The percentage of tin in the bronze alloys of the two swords has not yet been determined by analysis.

A ceramic bowl made by the Hittites was also discovered at Hattuša, dating to the late 15th/early 14th century, with a drawing of a warrior wearing a boar's tusk helmet with a horn, crest, and flowing ribbons. Since Hittite helmets are different from Aegean representations, what we have here may be the Hittite representation of a Mycenaean warrior. There have also been a number of Mycenaean discoveries at Masat Höyük. In Büyükkale at Hattuša, wall painting pieces in the Mycenaean style have also been found, according to researchers.

Mycenaean warrior depicted on a Hittite bowl, ca. 1300 BC

The bowl was found at Boğazköy and is now in the Çorum Archaeological Museum.

The figure has been identified as a Mycenaean warrior based on his armor and sword. There are no known combat scenes in Hittite art, and the style is unusually dynamic, so the bowl may have been incised by a foreign artist.

Who was Tudhaliya II?

Tudhaliya II was a Hittite king who ruled in the middle of the fourteenth century BC. He was the son of King Arnuwanda I and the father of Suppiluliuma I. Documents state that this happened after the passing of his father, I. Arnuwanda II. The Hittites had numerous revolts and assaults under Tuthaliya's reign. Tudhaliya therefore devoted practically all of his time to waging war against the enemy in various locations and re-establishing Hittite state power.

The Hittite state reached the point of disintegration, the Kashkas in the north pillaged Hattusha and descended to the south of the Kizilirmak, Arzawa attacked from the west, Azzi and Isuwa attacked from the east, and the enemy advanced to Kizzuwatna in the south, as stated in a written source from the Hattusili period.

Map of the Hittite Empire at its greatest extent, with Hittite rule c. 1350–1300 BC represented by the green line

The account of his son Suppiluliuma I's travels is one of the most significant documents containing information about Tudhaliya. When Hattusha was out of Hittite control, the record that has been partially preserved suggests that Tudhaliya directed his expeditions from the city of Samuha. According to reports, he waged multiple successful expeditions against the Kashkas, routing a confederation of nine tribes at one point and a confederation of twelve tribes at another.

Written Sources on Technological Exchange in the Late Bronze Age

While archaeological finds provide tangible evidence of cultural exchange, written sources from the period offer invaluable insights into the intricate dynamics of technological diffusion. Among the most notable written records are the diplomatic archives discovered in Hattuša, which contain correspondence between Hittite kings and rulers of neighboring regions.

These clay tablets and cuneiform inscriptions reveal a wealth of information about diplomatic relations, alliances, and trade agreements between the Hittites and their neighbors, including the Aegean civilizations. References to the exchange of valuable goods, including weaponry, adorn these tablets, emphasizing the importance of technology as a tool of diplomacy and international relations.

Furthermore, the "Ahhiyawa texts" found at Hattuša mention the Ahhiyawans, a term believed to refer to the Mycenaean Greeks, who played a significant role in the Late Bronze Age Mediterranean. These texts indicate possible interactions between the Hittites and the Mycenaeans, further strengthening the idea of extensive cross-cultural contact during the era.

The discovery of Aegean-type swords in Anatolia, particularly the find at Hattuša, offers compelling evidence of the widespread trade and cultural exchange during the Late Bronze Age. These remarkable weapons not only exemplify the artistic achievements of ancient societies but also highlight the importance of technology as a means of diplomatic and economic engagement.

The written sources, including diplomatic archives and cuneiform tablets, further substantiate the existence of complex networks that facilitated the exchange of technology and ideas between the Hittites and their contemporaries in the Aegean region.

As archaeologists continue to uncover more evidence and scholars decipher additional written records, our understanding of this fascinating period in history will undoubtedly deepen, revealing the interconnectedness and interdependence of ancient civilizations in the Mediterranean world.

In Aegean Prehistory, Anatolia Tags Archaeology's Greatest Finds, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Hittite Bowl featuring Mycenaean Warrior?: Tracing the Mycenaean Footprints in Anatolia

August 4, 2023

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS


Warriors of the Mycenaean Age: Unearthing connections between Hittite artifacts and texts and their echoes in ancient Greek literature. An interplay of archaeology, mythology, and real history.

One of the most intriguing aspects of ancient history is the confluence of archeology, literature, and mythology. The culture and military strength of the Mycenaean civilization, evident around 1300 BC, have been famously encapsulated in a Hittite bowl depicting a Mycenaean warrior. Beyond the aesthetic beauty of the artifact, it offers a unique insight into the cross-cultural interactions in the ancient world and could potentially shed light on legendary Mycenaean raids in Anatolia, as well as the enduring impact of the Achaean presence in the region, as recorded in epic works like Cypria and the Iliad.

Mycenaean warrior depicted on a Hittite bowl, ca. 1300 BC

The bowl was found at Boğazköy and is now in the Çorum Archaeological Museum.

The figure has been identified as a Mycenaean warrior based on his armor and sword. There are no known combat scenes in Hittite art, and the style is unusually dynamic, so the bowl may have been incised by a foreign artist.

Mycenaean Warrior on a Hittite Bowl: Historical Significance

The Hittite bowl, dating from approximately 1300 BC, portrays a Mycenaean warrior in full battle gear, a testimony to the cultural intermixing that occurred during this era. It appears to be a Mycenaean warrior in battle gear, complete with a plumed and horned helmet, similar to the 'zoned' helmets worn by Aegean warriors around the Late Bronze Age. This depiction affirms the wide reach of Mycenaean influence and indicates a level of respect for Mycenaean martial prowess. Not only does the artifact imply Mycenaean-Hittite interaction, but it may also suggest a record of the legendary Mycenaean military incursions into the region of Assuwa, a confederation of states in western Anatolia.

Dendra panoply

Archaeological Museum of Nafplio: Front view of Mycenaen armour and boar's tusk helmet from chamber tomb 12 of Dendra cementery (end of 15th century BC).

By C messier

Assuwa and the Mycenaean Raids

The precise nature of the Mycenaean interactions with Assuwa remains largely speculative due to limited historical sources. Still, the Hittite bowl with the Mycenaean warrior may serve as indirect evidence of these hypothetical raids. The Mycenaean military expeditions could have been driven by the desire for control over strategic areas, resources, or to curb the power of potential rival kingdoms. The existence of such military campaigns, as suggested by the artistic representation, opens up possibilities of a deeper Mycenaean imprint in Anatolia, which may be echoed in ancient Greek literature.

The Achaean Presence in Northwest Anatolia: Cypria and Iliad

The Achaean presence in Anatolia, the setting for many legendary episodes in Greek mythology, is evident in ancient epic narratives. Cypria, an epic poem that predates Homer, recounts an Achaean expedition sent to rescue Helen from Troy. In an ill-fated episode, Achilles and other Achaean warriors are said to have fought in Teuthrania, an area in northwest Anatolia south of Troy. This account could reflect historical memories of Mycenaean activities in the region, which were passed down in the form of epic stories.

Further affirmation of Achaean involvement in Anatolia can be found in Homer's Iliad. Here, we learn about Herakles sacking Troy during the reign of Priam's father, Laomedon. Herakles, with only six ships, is said to have successfully breached the city. The narrative seems to be a distant echo of an age when the Mycenaeans projected their power across the Aegean into Anatolia.

Hittite Records of Ahhiyawa Military Involvement

Ahhiyawa, widely believed by historians to refer to the Mycenaean Greeks, frequently appears in Hittite records, underscoring the intricate military alliances and conflicts of the time. The Hittite annals often describe Ahhiyawa leaders and mercenaries as formidable military forces, serving as allies to the western Anatolian confederations in their resistance against Hittite dominance. These texts provide an additional layer of evidence for the Mycenaean-Anatolian interactions, suggesting that the Ahhiyawa were not only involved in the region but had strategic alliances, often siding with local powers against the Hittite empire. The mercenary nature of these warriors offers insights into the complex geopolitical landscape of the era, characterized by fluid alliances, military campaigns, and power dynamics. The Hittite records, thus, further corroborate the profound impact of Mycenaean or Achaean forces in Anatolia, marking their place in the wider canvas of ancient Near Eastern history.

Drawing by Jill Curry Robbins.

The artistic depiction of a Mycenaean warrior on a Hittite bowl, while intriguing in its own right, also provides a fascinating link to the purported Mycenaean activities in Anatolia. As we navigate through the interconnected realms of archeology, literature, and mythology, we find a resonance of Mycenaean or Achaean presence in the region, immortalized in epics such as Cypria and the Iliad. These stories, possibly based on historical events, reflect an era of cultural exchange, conflict, and heroism, and serve as enduring reminders of the intricate tapestry that is our collective past.

In Aegean Prehistory, Anatolia Tags Archaeology's Greatest Finds, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Artificial Intelligence is Used to Reconstruct the Lighthouse in the Ancient City of Patara

July 28, 2023

The lighthouse in the ancient city of Patara, which was constructed by the Roman Emperor Nero and is thought to have collapsed in the tsunami of 1481, was rebuilt using artificial intelligence technology.

The Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism approved the designation of 2020 as the Patara Year, and the 2020 Patara Year will take place at the ancient city of Patara, which is now known as Ovagelemiş Village, in the southern Turkish province of Fethiye. Patara is also of particular significance due to its archaeological and historical significance, as well as the fact that it is one of the few beaches where the Caretta-Caretta Mediterranean turtles lay their eggs and have bred for millions of years.

Beginning in 1988, excavations took place in Patara Ancient City, the seat of Lycia. The couple, Prof. Dr. Fahri Işık and Prof. Dr. Havva İşkan Işık In the excavations that started, hundreds of historical items, particularly from the Lycian culture, have been found.

The lighthouse Nero, the Roman Emperor, constructed in 64 AD is one of the most significant pieces of art discovered during the Patara excavations. It was discovered that the lighthouse discovered by Prof. Dr. Havva had 2,500 original stones, precisely 12 years after the excavations got underway.

500 stones are being merged to make 2,050

On the completed 6-meter podium, the lighthouse is being constructed by replacing the stones that can't be utilized statically due to dropping from a height.

The Antalya Governorship Investment Monitoring and Coordination Directorate (YIKOB) Cultural Heritage Directorate submitted the application, according to reports from the DHA agency.

A technical report was created in the 15th century in an effort to stop the lighthouse from collapsing in the event of another earthquake or tsunami in the years following its reconstruction. At the time, it was believed that the Rhodes earthquake and the ensuing tsunami had destroyed the lighthouse. According to the report written by Dr. Cenk Üstünda, the reconstruction would make use of components including steel spirals, steel pipes, steel rods, pure epoxy resin glue, carbon-fiber mesh reinforcement, and high-strength natural hydraulic lime-binder mortar.

2500 stones had their X-rays taken

2,500 stones were removed one by one throughout the course of the protracted excavations, and after being subjected to physical and chemical tests in the lab, their original locations were discovered using artificial intelligence technology and computer software.

Havva şkan worked on the construction site alongside the architectural team, and Ahabettin Ztürk, head of the department of architecture at Van Yüzüncü Yl University and the reconstruction project's scientific consultant, explained that about 2,050 stone excavations were laser studied in three dimensions, and all dimensions were scanned.

It spent over a thousand years underground

Doctor Ztürk noted that the stones were still present beneath the sand after the lantern collapsed, and their preservation for use in the current rebuilding is a significant benefit. Dr. Ztürk points out that each stone is examined in the lab for its physical and chemical characteristics. Although it is not direct proof, certain information about the general position of the lighthouse was utilized on several coins from the Nero era.

Only when they are set in their actual locations can stones with concave and convex surfaces built of polygonal and rectangular stones align with their positions. The lengthy duration of the study is due to the fact that each stone in the stone hospital was individually x-rayed and examined to determine whether there was tissue loss inside. He advised using the sturdy ones one by one rather than the bad ones.

technology using artificial intelligence

Dr. Ztürk stated, "All data were processed in the program. It is the building system software that is used to determine the original placement of the stones. A total of 2,500 stones were tested using a variety of trial-and-error techniques, and 80–90% of them were determined to be compliant.

According to my assessment of the early data we have gathered, it is estimated that 80% of the original stone and 20% of the new stone will be used. In this manner, the lighthouse will be repaired; however, this procedure is more like reconstruction than restoration, as the building is being rebuilt, he stated.

No example exists in the world

In terms of a lighthouse indicating that the first application in Turkey was 2 thousand, or about 80% of the annual refurbished using the original stones, Dr. Ztürk noted that there are no examples in the world where 80% original materials are employed. Doctor ztürk, It is a significant structure that serves as the initial application in this sense. It has an upward spiraling architectural texture and a cylindrical body that is around 26.5 meters high and 6 meters in diameter.

The Prestige Project of Nero

An inscription in gold lettering on the lighthouse provides information about who built it and when, and it is claimed to be the prestige project of the Roman Emperor Nero. The Patara Council and Sextus Marcius, the ruler of the Patara people at the time, are thanked in a statement found in stone inscriptions that was unearthed during the excavations: "We thank you for governing the people of Lycia rightfully, without taking bribes, and for adorning our city with beautiful monuments for eight years."

a valuable landmark for all people

Prof. Havva, who worked on the lighthouse excavation, said:

"Our nation will have another monument of worldwide importance when our works, which were started by the Antalya Governorship and Investment Monitoring and Coordination Directorate in Patara in 2020 and accepted with the request of our Ministry of Culture and Tourism and the permission of our President, are completed.

As a scientist, I want to show my gratitude to each of them. We continue to work on our lighthouse, which has the potential to become one of Antalya's emblems, using a multidisciplinary approach and cutting-edge technology. Nero claims that he built this lighthouse, one of the most important structures in the Roman Empire, "for the salvation of the mariners." We are striving toward the time when we may proudly display this lighthouse to our nation and to the valiant sailors of this nation.

In Anatolia

Illustration by Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Interweaving Mythology and Metallurgical Developments: The Case of the Succession of the Five Ages of Man in Hesiod's 'Works and Days'

July 27, 2023

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS


The succession of the Five Human Generations in Hesiod's "Works and Days": Correspondence of the mythological narrative with the metallurgical developments in Greece and the wider area?

The history of metallurgy is directly linked to the evolution of man. The technological and cultural developments in Greek mainland and the wider area of southeastern Europe and the eastern Mediterranean associated with metallurgy may have left their echo in the traditions and myths that survived until historical times, according to several modern scholars of ancient Greek literature. The transformation of precious metals into impressive objects of prestige, power, and religious symbolism made a special impression on prehistoric people, and it is quite logical that these innovations left their traces in timeless traditions. A mythological narrative that shows a remarkable temporal parallel with these developments is the succession of human genera in Hesiod's work, "Works and Days" (the Golden Age, the Silver Age, the Bronze Age, the Age of Heroes, and the Iron Age).

The ancient Greek poet Hesiod, in his work "Works and Days," presents us with a remarkable chronology of humanity's development. His account, rooted deeply in mythological narratives, describes the succession of five human generations. As intriguing as the narrative itself is the speculated correspondence of this progression with the metallurgical developments, This article will delve into the layers of Hesiod's anthropogonic myth, tracing the intricate connection with the era's technological advancements in metallurgy.

The Age of Gold

Hesiod's first age of man, the Golden Age, was an era of abundance, peace, and prosperity. Humans lived in harmony with the gods; their lives were filled with joy and devoid of toil. This age aligns with the Greek Neolithic era, a period marked by the crafting of gold artifacts. The use of gold in this epoch was mainly symbolic, signifying wealth, power, and divine favor, reflecting the harmony between gods and men in Hesiod's golden age.

The heyday of Balkan gold metallurgy occurred during the 5th millennium BC. According to the archaeological data, it is probably reflected in the time-compressed "golden age" of the "Golden Generation", the starting point of the human species according to Hesiod's myth (which, as we now know from natural anthropology, took place several million years ago).

Representation of the burials in the Varna necropolis in Bulgaria. Those Eneolithic burials have also offered a lot more than the precious artifacts found within them and discoveries relating to social hierarchies; the features of the graves have also provided key insights into the religious beliefs and complex funerary practices of this ancient civilization.

The Age of Silver

In the Silver Age, Hesiod's narrative darkens. Humans in this era lived as children for a hundred years, under the dominion of their mothers. When they grew up, their short-lived maturity was marked by strife and ignorance. The silver generation refused to worship the gods, resulting in Zeus destroying them.

Historically, the progression to the use of silver in the Aegean area marks a shift in technological and cultural development. The shift might parallel Hesiod's mythological narrative's movement towards strife and ignorance. The silver artifacts found from this era are often associated with burial practices, symbolizing a shift towards mortality's acknowledgment, reminiscent of the harsh punishment faced by Hesiod's silver generation.

Silversmithing, another metallurgical manifestation that extends chronologically to the beginning of the 3rd millennium BC, knew its heyday in the innovative Aegean with the highly symbolic ring-shaped periaptas, possibly capturing their meaning as a memory in the collective ideology of the people of that time of the era. This development seems to have been erased in the era of the "Silver Generation," which was destroyed for its impiety with the so-called Ogygus Flood, an old mythological story etched deep in the memory of humanity that is also compressed in time.

The Age of Bronze

The next era, that of the "Bronze Age", is undoubtedly associated with a new important innovation, that of the copper-tin alloy (bronze), which is concentrated in time from the 3rd millennium BC. and gave the conventional name to the research of the so-called "Bronze Age". According to the myth, Zeus created the people of this Generation from ashes. Their armor was forged from copper, as were their houses and tools.

The Bronze Age in Hesiod's sequence represents a time of warriors. These men, made from ash trees, were strong and formidable. They lived by the sword and ultimately fell by it. Their end was violent, and their passage to Hades was without honor.

Historically, the Bronze Age marked a significant technological breakthrough in metallurgy. The advent of bronze tools and weapons revolutionized societies, leading to the growth of trade networks and facilitating the rise of complex civilizations. Yet it was also an age marked by territorial conflicts and warfare, echoing the violent nature of Hesiod's Bronze Age men.

A hoard of bronze socketed axes from the Bronze Age was found in modern Germany. This was the top tool of the period and also seems to have been used as a store of value.

Wolfgang Sauber's own work

The Age of Heroes

This age, unique to Hesiod's narrative, is an intermediary period, the age of heroes and demigods. These individuals were nobler and more righteous, living in the time of legendary heroic exploits. This era doesn't have a direct metallurgical association but might symbolize a period of cultural and social transition, marked by the Homeric tales' heroic deeds.

The "Age of Heroes" is the only generation that does not correspond to any metal. It is also the only one more brilliant than the generation it succeeds. To this generation belonged the so-called Heroes of mythology, such as the Heroes of the Homeric Epics, the Argonauts, Theseus, and others. Its identification with the Bronze Age is also logical. According to experts, this generation of people summarizes a long memory horizon of past human achievements that do not necessarily have a chronological sequence between them.

The Age of Iron

The Iron Age, according to Hesiod, is the current and last generation of men. It is a time of toil, strife, and decay, where virtue is rare and injustice prevails. This pessimistic portrayal reflects the turmoil and upheavals during the Greek Dark Ages, when iron started being widely used. Iron, being common and prone to rust, can symbolize the deterioration of moral values and the hardship of life during this time.

Hesiod, like all his contemporaries, belongs to the "Iron Generation". People of this generation are also hardy but live a sad existence full of toil, drudgery, and misery without any moral principle. During this generation, Pygmy Law applies. Babies will be born with gray hair, and the gods will have completely abandoned humanity. In archaeology, the Iron Age refers to that period of history when people used iron to make tools and weapons. The adoption of this material coincided with other changes in past societies in terms of cultural methods, religious beliefs, and artistic style, which affected the economic, social, and possibly spiritual development of the era.

An exhibit of metal tools and weapons (likely votive deposits) found in the gravel pits around the River Sile is on display in the Venice National Archaeological Museum, a museum in San Marco, Venice.

Own work by the original uploader, Author Ethan Doyle White

The mythical succession of the five generations in Hesiod's "Works and Days" presents a remarkable parallel to the metallurgical advancements on the Greek mainland and in the wider region. The narrative can be seen as an allegorical representation of the socio-cultural transformations during these periods. However, one must remember that while the similarities are compelling, the allegory is not an exact historical account. It instead shows how ancient Greeks may have conceptualized and rationalized their past, drawing from the material culture they knew and the mythological narratives they believed in.

  • Information derived from the book of Theodoros G. Giannopoulos, ‘The Greeks: Whence and When? Crete University Press, 2012

Read here about the book
In Aegean Prehistory, Balkan Region, Anatolia, Greece's Historical Period Tags Religion, History, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

How a basement remodeling project led to the discovery of The Derinkuyu Subterranean City

June 23, 2023

A basement remodeling effort in 1963 produced the archeological find of a lifetime: the 20,000-person Derinkuyu Subterranean City.

In the Turkish village of Derinkuyu, a guy who took a sledgehammer to a basement wall got more home remodeling than he anticipated. He discovered a tunnel behind the wall. More tunnels followed, eventually connecting a huge number of halls and chambers. It was a sizable underground structure that had been deserted by its residents before the fateful stroke of the hammer.

The unidentified Turk, whose name is not mentioned in the paper, had discovered a gigantic underground city that was up to 18 floors tall, 280 feet (76 meters) deep, and big enough to house 20,000 people. Who constructed it, and why? Who abandoned it, when, and why? Some of the answers come from history and geology.

The geology of Cappadocia is incredibly rocky. Derinkuyu is situated in Cappadocia, an area in the Turkish interior famous for its fantastically craggy topography and numerous "fairy chimneys." The erosion of the tuff rock type produced those enormous stone structures. Despite its name, that stone, which was formed from volcanic ash and covers much of the area, is not very durable.

The natives have built their own holes in the soft stone for underground residences, storage areas, temples, and refuges for millennia, taking cues from the wind and rain. There are hundreds of underground homes in Cappadocia, with roughly 40 having at least two floors. None are as big or well-known as Derinkuyu at this point.

Derinkuyu-underground-cities-5-300x200.jpg
images (1).jpg
images (2).jpg
images (3).jpg
images (4).jpg
images (5).jpg
images.jpg
podziemne_miasto_kaymakli_kapadocja.jpg
raw-2006-04-100-0215-underground_town_below_derinkuyu_4.jpg
αρχείο λήψης (1).jpg
αρχείο λήψης (2).jpg
αρχείο λήψης (3).jpg
αρχείο λήψης (4).jpg
αρχείο λήψης (5).jpg
αρχείο λήψης (6).jpg
αρχείο λήψης (7).jpg
αρχείο λήψης.jpg
Derinkuyu-underground-cities-5-300x200.jpg images (1).jpg images (2).jpg images (3).jpg images (4).jpg images (5).jpg images.jpg podziemne_miasto_kaymakli_kapadocja.jpg raw-2006-04-100-0215-underground_town_below_derinkuyu_4.jpg αρχείο λήψης (1).jpg αρχείο λήψης (2).jpg αρχείο λήψης (3).jpg αρχείο λήψης (4).jpg αρχείο λήψης (5).jpg αρχείο λήψης (6).jpg αρχείο λήψης (7).jpg αρχείο λήψης.jpg

There isn't much unambiguous information on Derinkuyu's origins in the historical record. The oldest portion of the complex may have been excavated around 2000 BC by the Hittites, who were in control of the area at the time, or maybe around 700 BC by the Phrygians. Some assert that the city was constructed in the early centuries AD by local Christians.

Whoever they were, they were very skilled; while cave-ins are a significant risk, the soft rock makes tunneling very simple. Hence, substantial support pillars are required. At Derinkuyu, no floor has ever fallen in.

About the underground facility, we can be more convinced of two things. As evidenced, for instance, by the rolling stones used to seal the city from the inside, the major goal of the colossal effort must have been to hide from invading troops. Second, the complex's latest extensions and modifications, which are clearly Christian in nature, date from the sixth to the tenth centuries AD.

The city was ventilated by a total of more than 15,000 shafts, the majority of which were around 10 cm broad and extended into the first and second floors of the city when it was cut off from the world above. This made sure there was enough airflow all the way to the eighth level.

Living and sleeping areas were located on the top levels, which makes sense given that they had the optimum ventilation. The bottom levels had a dungeon as well as being primarily utilized for storage.

There were areas in between that were used for a variety of things, including a wine press, domestic animals, a monastery, and minor churches. The cruciform church on the seventh level is the most well-known.

In Anatolia Tags Lost Cities

Illustration by Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Asia: The Evolution of a Name from Mycenaean Antiquity to Contemporary Geography

June 5, 2023

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS


How the Mycenaean epithet “Aswiya/Asia” was primarily a place name and later became the name of an entire continent.

The vast and diverse continent of Asia, comprising an astonishing breadth of cultures, languages, and landscapes, owes its name to an ancient epithet nestled in the annals of Mycenaean civilization. The term 'Asia” has undertaken a remarkable journey, originating as the humble Mycenaean epithet 'Aswiya' and transforming through the passage of time and civilizations to define the most populous continent on Earth. This fascinating odyssey of a single name serves as a microcosm of our evolving understanding of geography, politics, and cultural identities throughout history.

Origins of the Mycenaean epithet "Aswiya"

The term 'Aswiya,' as found in the Mycenaean records, is closely associated with the Hittite and Luwian term 'Asuwa,' which denoted a confederation of states in western Anatolia during the late Bronze Age. This epithet was documented in a series of tablets discovered in the Mycenaean palatial archives, such as those in Pylos and Knossos. The tablets provide a glimpse into the intricate diplomatic relationships, trading networks, and power dynamics between these ancient civilizations.

The original geographical designation of 'Aswiya' or 'Asuwa' is believed to have been relatively limited, referring primarily to regions on the Aegean Sea's eastern coasts and western Anatolia. The term's precise location remains a subject of scholarly debate, but it is generally agreed that it centered around the Troad and extended southward along the Aegean coastline.

'Aswiya' becomes 'Asia'

The evolution of the term 'Aswiya' into 'Asia' is a testament to the dynamic interplay of language, geography, and history. Over centuries, as civilizations rose and fell, the term 'Asia' began to be used by the Greeks in a broader context than its original Mycenaean designation. The Ionian Greeks, residing in the western part of Asia Minor, were among the first to use 'Asia' to describe the lands to their east, initially referring to the areas ruled by the Persian Empire.

The Achaemenid Persians themselves seem to have adopted a version of the term, using “” to refer to the province that roughly corresponds to modern-day Turkey. This Perso-Greek usage of 'Asia' became increasingly prevalent throughout the Hellenistic period, especially after Alexander the Great's conquests, which spread Greek culture and language far and wide.

The Greeks passed it on to the Romans

As the torch of empire passed from the Greeks to the Romans, so too did the term 'Asia.' The Romans initially used 'Asia' to denote the province of Asia Minor, their first acquisition in Anatolia, conquered in the 2nd century BCE. This Roman province of 'Asia' comprised most of western Anatolia and was one of the wealthiest and most densely populated regions in the empire.

However, as the Roman Empire expanded eastward, incorporating vast territories spanning three continents, the term 'Asia' began to be applied to an increasingly large geographical area. By the time of the late Roman Empire, 'Asia' had become a catch-all term for the lands to the east of the Roman world, encapsulating the enormity and diversity of the continent that we now know as Asia.

From the Romans to the Modern West

The term 'Asia,' as we understand it today, continued to evolve well after the fall of the Roman Empire, owing much to the advancements in geographical knowledge and global exploration in the subsequent centuries. During the Middle Ages, European explorers and cartographers began using 'Asia' to refer to the vast lands east of the Ural Mountains, the Caucasus, the Caspian Sea, and the Black Sea, reflecting a more modern understanding of continental boundaries. As the Age of Discovery dawned in the 15th century, propelled by advancements in navigation and seafaring, 'Asia' started encapsulating regions even further east, including the Indian subcontinent, the Far East, and the islands of the Pacific. This continental understanding was eventually formalized in the Western tradition through the works of influential scholars and geographers, such as Ptolemy and later, Mercator. The once Mycenaean toponym, 'Aswiya” has thus journeyed across millennia through the lenses of Greeks, Persians, Romans, and countless others before being adopted by the modern Western world to represent an incredibly diverse continent rich in culture, history, and natural splendor.

Thus, the transformation of 'Aswiya' into 'Asia' presents a riveting narrative that unveils the fluidity of cultural exchange and the evolution of geographical cognition. It reminds us that every term we use, even those defining our continents, carries within it an incredibly rich tapestry of historical, cultural, and linguistic shifts. The story of 'Asia”—from its roots in the Bronze Age Aegean world, through the Greeks, Persians, and Romans, and into the cartographic distinctions of the modern Western world—provides us with a unique lens to appreciate the intricate interplay of time, language, and history. Today, 'Asia' stands as a testament to the enduring power of names and their capacity to encapsulate and convey the vast complexities of human civilization and its geographical understanding.

In Aegean Prehistory, Anatolia Tags History, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

The Lamp of Aeneas found in Tenea, Greece: What it proves about the city's relationship with Troy

April 10, 2023

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis


Tenea: An Ancient City with a Rich History and Mythical Connections

Nestled in the region of Corinthia in southern Greece, the ancient city of Tenea boasts a history that dates back to the Bronze Age. Known for its cultural and historical significance, this enigmatic city has been the subject of archaeological studies for decades. Its origin story, which links Tenea to the Trojan War, has intrigued scholars and history enthusiasts alike. In this article, we will explore the history behind the foundation of Tenea, its discovery by archaeologists, and delve into its possible connections to ancient Troy.

Foundation of Tenea

The foundation of Tenea is steeped in myth and legend. According to ancient Greek tradition, the city was founded by Trojan captives who were brought to the Peloponnese after the fall of Troy. These captives, were given the task by Agamemnon of building a new city, which they named Tenea in honor of the goddess Athena, who was also known as Teneatis.

This origin story, while rooted in myth, is believed to hold some elements of truth. It is thought that Tenea was established during the 12th century BC, around the same time that the Trojan War is thought to have taken place. The city's strategic location, between the ancient cities of Corinth and Mycenae, allowed it to grow and flourish throughout the centuries, becoming a prosperous trade center.

Discovery by Archaeologists

Tenea's ancient ruins remained hidden from the world until the 19th century when the first excavations began. However, it wasn't until the 21st century that the significance of the site started to become clear. In 2013, the archaeologist Eleni Korka led a team of researchers to conduct extensive excavations, unearthing a wealth of artifacts and evidence of ancient life.

The archaeological site spans several acres and includes remnants of ancient houses, tombs, and a theater. The discovery of an ancient cemetery, in particular, provided crucial insights into the lives of the people who once inhabited Tenea. The graves, which date from the 4th century BC to the 4th century AD, contained valuable offerings such as pottery, jewelry, and weapons, indicating the wealth and status of the ancient Teneans.

Clues About Tenea's Connection with Ancient Troy

The mythical connection between Tenea and ancient Troy has long captivated historians and archaeologists. While definitive proof of this connection remains elusive, there are several clues that suggest a strong link between the two cities.

Firstly, the mythological origin story of Tenea's foundation by Trojan captives implies a direct connection to Troy. Additionally, the worship of the goddess Athena Teneatis further strengthens this link, as Athena was the patron goddess of both cities.

Furthermore, during the excavations led by Eleni Korka, a stone inscription was found that bore the name of a Tenean man, Sekoundos. This discovery is significant because the name Sekoundos has a Trojan etymology, suggesting that the Teneans may have maintained their Trojan heritage for centuries after their settlement in Greece.

The Lamp of Aeneas - Tenea Under Roman Rule

There were several items uncovered at Tenea in 2018, including a Roman oil lamp depicting Aeneas leaving Troy holding his aged father Anchises on his shoulder and his younger son Ascanius by the hand. This representation was based on Virgil's epic "The Aeneid". A 500-square-meter complex of Roman baths was discovered during this season's dig at Tenea.

The relationship between the Romans and the Trojans is a captivating aspect of ancient history, blending myth and reality to create a powerful origin story. Despite the geographical and temporal distance between the two civilizations, the Romans viewed the Trojans as their ancestors, forging a connection that shaped the cultural and historical narrative of ancient Rome.

The most famous account of the relationship between the Romans and the Trojans comes exactly from the Roman poet Virgil's epic, the Aeneid. Written during the 1st century BC, the Aeneid recounts the story of Aeneas, a Trojan prince and the son of the goddess Venus (Aphrodite in Greek mythology) and the mortal Anchises. Following the fall of Troy, Aeneas and a group of survivors embark on a journey to find a new homeland.

After many trials and tribulations, Aeneas reaches the Italian peninsula, where he marries the Latin princess Lavinia and establishes the city of Alba Longa. According to the myth, Romulus and Remus, the legendary founders of Rome, are direct descendants of Aeneas, thus connecting the Romans to the Trojans through a shared lineage.

The relationship between the Romans and the Trojans held significant political implications. By claiming descent from the Trojans, the Romans could assert their divine lineage and elevate their status among the ancient Mediterranean civilizations. Furthermore, this connection allowed Rome to distance itself from the Greeks, who were often viewed as rivals.

The Roman conquest of Greece began in the 2nd century BC, with the Macedonian Wars marking the beginning of Rome's expansion into the Greek world. By the mid-1st century BCE, Rome had effectively annexed the entirety of Greece, incorporating the region into the Roman Empire as the province of Achaea.

During this time, Tenea's strategic location between Corinth and Mycenae made it an important center for trade and communication. Consequently, the city attracted the attention of the Roman conquerors, who sought to integrate Tenea into their growing empire.

The Roman conquerors brought with them their own customs, beliefs, and practices, which influenced the local culture of Tenea. At the same time, Tenea's unique history and connections to ancient Troy likely intrigued the Romans, who themselves believed in a shared lineage with the Trojans through the myth of Aeneas.


This mutual fascination led to a cultural exchange, with the Romans adopting certain aspects of Tenean culture, and the Teneans integrating Roman practices into their own way of life. For instance, the worship of the goddess Athena Teneatis, which was central to the Tenean religious tradition, may have resonated with the Romans due to their own reverence for the goddess Minerva, the Roman equivalent of Athena.

The city of Tenea experienced a period of transformation under Roman rule, as it adapted to the new political, economic, and cultural landscape. Roman influence in Tenea is evident in the archaeological record, which shows the construction of buildings, infrastructure, and monuments characteristic of Roman architecture.

As part of the province of Achaea, Tenea enjoyed a degree of autonomy, allowing it to maintain its local customs and traditions. The city continued to prosper during the Roman period, benefiting from the extensive trade networks that connected the Roman Empire. The ancient cemetery discovered in Tenea, with its rich grave offerings, provides evidence of the city's wealth and status during this time.

While archaeological evidence has not yet provided conclusive proof of a connection between Tenea and ancient Troy, the tantalizing clues unearthed so far invite further exploration and study. As excavations continue, it is hoped that more insights into the captivating history of this enigmatic city will be revealed.

As Tenea continues to be uncovered and studied, it stands as a testament to the rich cultural and historical tapestry of ancient Greece. Its unique history, which blends myth and reality, serves as a reminder of the complex connections between the ancient civilizations that shaped the world as we know it today.

In the meantime, the archaeological site of Tenea continues to draw visitors from around the world, eager to catch a glimpse of the city's ancient ruins and to uncover the mysteries that still lie buried beneath the earth. The ongoing exploration of Tenea promises to shed new light on the complexities of ancient Greek society and the enduring legacy of the Trojan War. As the story of Tenea unfolds, it enriches our understanding of the past and fuels our curiosity for the secrets that remain to be discovered.

In Aegean Prehistory, Anatolia, Greece's Historical Period Tags Archaeology's Greatest Finds, History, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

The "Troy Observation Terrace" that offers an ideal view of the Trojan Skamandros plain

September 19, 2022

BY THE ARCHAEOLOGIST EDITOR GROUP


Busts of the Achaean (Mycenaean Greek) and Trojan heroes of the Trojan War can be found in the Troy Observation Terrace (Truva Seyir Terası), located in the village of Tevfikiye, one kilometer away from the archaeological site of ancient Troy.

The observatory offers an ideal view of the mythical plain of the Skamandros River (Turkish: Karamenderes). The city of Troy itself was located on a hill in this particular plain, where the homeric battles of the Trojan War took place.

The Achaean Greeks set up their camp near the mouth of the river Scamander, where they ran aground their ships. The site of the ancient city today is about 15 kilometers from the coast, but the ancient estuary of Skamandros 3,000 years ago was about 5 kilometers further inland, opening into a bay that has since been silted up.

View fullsize 1.jpg
View fullsize 2.jpg
View fullsize 3.jpg
View fullsize 4.jpg
View fullsize 9.jpg
View fullsize 111.jpg
View fullsize 6.jpg
View fullsize 7.jpg

The building of the observatory resembles the prehistoric architecture of the palaces of Troy, with its characteristic columns and wall ends, as we know exactly from the representations of the Homeric city.

Troy VI was a city with robust fortifications, and architecturally sophisticated palace complex and common houses; obviously the capital of an extensive and prosperous state which controlled the Straits of Hellespont (modern Dardanelles) and the regions of the Thracian Peninsula and Troas (and a few more districts and islands).

An illustration shows Troy more than 3,000 years ago, corresponding with the era described by Homer. The inner city housed the ruling elite. The lower city was discovered only in the 1990s, and it expanded the settlement’s overall footprint tenfold. Findings suggest that Homeric Troy was home to as many as 10,000 people, and there is evidence that Anatolians from elsewhere sought refuge there during attacks by invading Greeks. 

Christoph Haußner, München

In general Troy VI fully meets the descriptions of the Homeric epics and other epics of the Trojan Cycle considering the richness and power of Troy. Troy VI survived for six centuries of prosperity and security behind her sturdy walls. The towers of the citadel walls were built around 1300 BC, several decades before her destruction, possibly due to increased danger because of Hittite, Achaean, Thracian, Phrygian and other aggressors.

Illustration showing daily life in the ancient city of Troy, believed to be located in modern-day Turkey. The city of Troy was the site of the famous Trojan War. Credit

CHRISTIAN JEGOU / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY

Tevfikiye village turned into a Troy-era archaeology park

Tevfikiye village in the northwestern province of Çanakkale has been turned into an archeology village depicting the Troy era. 

As part of a protocol signed by the Çanakkale Governor’s Office on Nov. 21, 2017, the village became an archaeology park due to its buildings and structures reminiscent of the Troy era as well as its rich history and mythological values. The goal is to make people visit the village during their tour to the ancient city of Troy and buy organic products and souvenirs from locals. 

According to the recent history of the village, Bulgarian immigrants who wanted to save their lives from the 1877-1878 Ottoman - Russian War settled here. In the meantime, it is known that the famous Schliemann also made excavations when they came, and those who came made their living by working with Schliemann, that is, in excavations.

The settlers built their houses with reeds and stones they brought from the excavation site . When the population increased, they wanted to become a village in 1891. In fact, the village mosque was built from the natural stones of the ancient city by a Greek craftsman from İntepe/Erenköy in 1895. The square, created at a spot that overlooks the wide Troy plain and called the “square of Troy,” was recreated as an observation area. The busts of the Troy-era heroes such as Sarpedon, Priamos, Paris, Helen, Homers and others were placed in this square.

A building in the garden of the village’s coffeehouse was renewed with the concept of the Troy house. A miniature waterfall was created in a field between the Troy Square and the mosque. The wedding hall in the village square was transformed into a museum and a culture and arts center. 

What You Must Do in Tevfikiye Archaeo-Village

  • Make sure to take pictures in front of the ancient-looking houses with the symbols and inscriptions about the Trojan heroes and the history of Troy.

  • See the health center and wedding hall decorated similarly to the Trojan 6 period.

  • Visit the village's old mosque, made from the stones of the Ancient City of Troy by a Greek master.

  • Check out the busts of Trojan heroes in the square overlooking the famous Trojan Plain . Enjoy the view between Sarpedon, Priam, Paris, Helen, Hector, Homer, Achilles, Agamemnon, Aias, Patraclos, Odysseus.

  • Enter the House of Troy. In this house, which is one of the most beautiful tangible cultural items ever built, stand at the door of the house, wander through the rooms, look out of the windows to feel the antiquity.

Troy, with its 4,000 years of history, is one of the most famous archaeological sites in the world. The first excavations at the site were undertaken by the famous archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann in 1870. In scientific terms, its extensive remains are the most significant demonstration of the first contact between the civilizations of Anatolia and the Mediterranean world.

Troia, Dardanelles and islands

Throughout the centuries, Troy has acted as a cultural bridge between the Troas region and the Balkans, Anatolia, the Aegean and Black Sea regions through migration, occupation, trade and the transmission of knowledge. Moreover, the siege of Troy by Achaean warriors from Greece in the 13th or 12th century B.C., immortalized by Homer in the Iliad, has inspired great creative artists throughout the world ever since.

In Aegean Prehistory, Anatolia Tags The Archaeologist Editorial Group, History

Illustration by Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Why do Experts Advocate Revising the Indo-European Linguistic Theory?

September 4, 2022

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis


Recent decades have seen a significant reorientation of scientific inquiry and discourse surrounding the theory of Indo-European linguistics.

The Indo-European Linguistic Theory has long been the foundation for understanding the history, development, and relationships between the many languages spoken across Europe and parts of Asia. Based on the idea that a single ancestral language, known as Proto-Indo-European, gave rise to the vast linguistic diversity we see today, this theory has provided valuable insights for historical linguistics, archaeology, and anthropology. However, recent findings have prompted some experts to propose a rethink of this influential theory, which could have wide-ranging implications for our understanding of language development and human history.

New evidence calls for a rethink.

Several factors have led scholars to reconsider the traditional Indo-European linguistic theory:

The Gravettian (30,000 to 20,000 years) is drawn in black and white; the subsequent Magdalenian (17,000 to 10,000 years) and Hamburgian (13,000-11,750 years) are in light blue and red. It is not known whether the spread of the Gravettian was a result of diffusion of people or cultures.

Source: Eugene E. Harris, Demic and cultural diffusion in prehistoric Europe in the age of ancient genomes

  • New data from archaeology, genetics, and linguistics: With advances in technology and scientific methods, researchers have been able to uncover new evidence that challenges the conventional narrative of the Indo-European linguistic family. The discovery of previously unknown languages, DNA analyses, and the study of ancient texts have provided fresh insights into the possible origins and development of these languages, leading some experts to argue that the current theory is outdated.

    The foundation of the ideas up until this point—a number of linguistic presumptions—is severely questioned.

    The investigated historical languages' content is a very recent creation, and the so-called "protolanguage" reconstruction is destroyed by the temporally incongruous data (James Clackson).

    N.S. Trubetskoy believes that a group with such a protolanguage located in space (Urheimat) and time likely never existed because of their material culture, worldview, and social institutions.

  • Inadequate explanation of linguistic diversity: Critics of the current theory argue that it fails to adequately explain the immense linguistic diversity found within the Indo-European language family. While the traditional theory posits a single ancestral language, it does not provide a satisfactory explanation for the complex linguistic differences between various Indo-European languages, which appear to have evolved independently of one another.

    The renowned archaeologist Herbert Kühn asserts that evidence of cultural fragmentation dates back to the Neolithic Era. The viewpoint of M. Alinei, who contends that the distinctive and extensive vocabulary of each IE language shows that this fragmentation had already occurred long before the development of Neolithic society, is on the same page.

    According to some linguistic theories, language's primary quality is preservation. Language, which is a social product rather than a living thing, occasionally changes, usually as a result of unusual and unique social processes. The idea of "linguistic waves" is a persistently popular one from the past (Wellentheorie, wave theory).

    A new perspective on the place of the IE protolanguage as part of the "wide-spread Proto-Indo-European linguistic continuum" is presented by findings like the network of cognate European hydronyms (confuting the one and only IE heartland).

    The findings of linguistic paleontology are also significant because they suggest that terms and names for fundamental components of the natural world, everyday items and tools, or human life and communication in general should likely be traced back to the origins of the "Speaking Man" (Homo Loquens), rather than to a period just before the Agricultural Revolution.

Map of Early Neolithic Europe, by Eupedia

Distribution of the Indo-European languages seen in terms of the wave theory (after Schmidt and Lehmann).

Old European hydronymic map for the root *Sal-, *Salm-

Old European hydronymic map for the root *al-, *alm-

  • Alternative hypotheses: As scholars delve deeper into the linguistic, genetic, and archaeological evidence, they have put forth alternative hypotheses that challenge the traditional theory. For instance, some researchers propose that instead of a single Proto-Indo-European language, there may have been multiple ancestral languages that gave rise to the various branches of the Indo-European family. This would require a significant reevaluation of the current theory and its underlying assumptions.

    The IE problem's time frame has now dramatically expanded. Regarding the Paleolithic Age's language environment, there are many highly intriguing ideas and observations, both from an archaeological (and other) perspective. It is significant to consider that a first linguistic and cultural unification in Europe may have occurred during the Upper Paleolithic (Gravettian hypothesis), when the constant movement of hunter-gatherers may have forced linguistic stability and convergence (though probably not Nostratic), without this view amounting to an out-of-date immigration theory like those that predominated in the 20th century.

Implications for Language Study and Human History

A reconsideration of the Indo-European Linguistic Theory has the potential to reshape our understanding of language development and human history. If the current theory is revised, it could:

  • Change the way we study languages: A new understanding of the origins and development of the Indo-European languages would require scholars to reassess their approach to studying these languages, from historical linguistics to comparative grammar and beyond.

  • Impact theories of human migration: A revised theory could also have implications for our understanding of human migration and the spread of cultures across Europe and Asia. It may provide new insights into how ancient populations interacted and exchanged ideas, fostering a more nuanced understanding of human history.

  • Encourage interdisciplinary research: As experts from various fields continue to challenge and refine the Indo-European Linguistic Theory, it may encourage more interdisciplinary research, bringing together linguists, archaeologists, geneticists, and other scholars to collaborate and share their knowledge.

The Indo-European Linguistic Theory has been a cornerstone of language and historical studies for many years, but new evidence and alternative hypotheses have prompted a growing number of experts to call for a reevaluation of its central tenets. As scholars continue to explore the complex web of linguistic, genetic, and archaeological evidence, it is essential to remain open to new ideas and to embrace the potential for a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the Indo-European language family and its place in human history.

In Aegean Prehistory, Anatolia, Balkan Region, Eurasian Steppe, Europe Tags History, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

The History of Writing: Tracing the Development of expressing Language by Systems of Markings

September 4, 2022

by dimosthenis vasiloudis


Protowriting, ideographic systems, or early mnemonic symbols came before more advanced writing systems in the evolution of writing in human societies (symbols or letters that make remembering them easier).

A subsequent development is true writing, in which the content of a spoken language is encoded so that another reader may reasonably reconstruct the identical utterance written down. It differs from proto-writing, which frequently forgoes recording grammatical words and affixes, making it harder or even impossible to reassemble the precise meaning intended by the writer unless a substantial amount of context is already known in advance.

Writing innovations

The idea that writing originated in a single civilization and was called "monogenesis" persisted for a long time. According to academics, all writing originated in Mesopotamia's ancient Sumer and spread around the world as a result of cultural diffusion. This argument holds that traders or merchants traveling between geographical locations passed on the idea of representing language by written signs, though perhaps not necessarily the specifics of how such a system operated.

The finding of ancient Mesoamerican scripts, far from Middle Eastern sources, demonstrated, however, that writing had been created more than once. In at least four ancient civilizations, including Mesopotamia (between 3400 and 3100 BCE), Egypt (about 3250 BCE), China (1200 BCE), and lowland portions of southern Mexico and Guatemala, writing may have independently originated (by 500 BCE).

Some academics have suggested that ancient Egypt "The earliest authentic examples of Egyptian writing differ from Mesopotamian writing in both structure and style, indicating that they must have emerged independently. Although there is still a chance that Mesopotamian "stimulus dispersion" occurred, the influence could not have extended beyond the dissemination of an idea."

Because there is no evidence of communication between ancient China and the Near Eastern literate civilizations, as well as because Mesopotamian and Chinese approaches to phonetic representation differ, it is thought that ancient Chinese characters are independent creations.

The Vinča symbols.

The Rongorongo script of Easter Island, the Vina symbols from about 5500 BCE, and the Indus script of the Bronze Age Indus Valley civilization are all controversial. Since none have been translated, it is unclear if they all represent real writing, protowriting, or something entirely different.

The earliest coherent texts date from around 2600 BCE, and Sumerian archaic (pre-cuneiform) writing and Egyptian hieroglyphs are usually regarded as the earliest authentic writing systems. Both developed out of their ancestors' proto-literate symbol systems between 3400 and 3100 BCE. The Proto-Elamite script belongs to roughly the same time frame.

writing methods

Writing systems are distinct from symbolic communication systems. For most writing systems, reading a text requires some knowledge of the spoken language that goes along with it. In contrast, it's not always necessary to have a prior understanding of a spoken language to use symbolic systems like information signs, paintings, maps, and mathematics. Every human group has its own language, which is thought by many to be a natural and essential aspect of mankind.

Writing system development has been intermittent, uneven, and delayed, and old oral communication systems have only been partially replaced. Writing systems generally develop more slowly after they are formed than their spoken counterparts and frequently preserve traits and idioms that have been lost to the spoken language.

Three writing standards are thought to apply to all writing systems. First, writing must be comprehensive; it must have a meaning or purpose, and it must make a point or be able to convey that message. Second, whether they are physical or digital, all writing systems must include some kind of symbol that can be created on a surface. In order to facilitate communication, the writing system's symbols must resemble spoken words or speech.

The greatest advantage of writing is that it gives society a way to regularly and thoroughly preserve information—something that the spoken word could not previously do as successfully. Writing enables communities to communicate knowledge, transmit information, and

stages of development

Sumer

An ancient civilization of southern Mesopotamia, is believed to be the place where written language was first invented around 3200 BCE.

Beginning with the Neolithic pottery phase, when clay tokens were used to keep track of particular quantities of animals or other goods, writing first appeared. These tokens were initially imprinted on the exterior of spherical clay envelopes, which were later used to keep them. Afterwards, flat tablets were gradually introduced in place of the tokens, and signs were recorded using a stylus. Towards the end of the fourth millennium BCE, Uruk was where actual writing was first discovered. Other areas of the Near East quickly followed.

The earliest recorded account of the development of writing is found in a poem from ancient Mesopotamia:

The Lord of Kulaba patted some clay and wrote on it like a tablet because the messenger's mouth was heavy and he couldn't repeat the message. It has never been possible to write on clay before.

Enmerkar and the King of Aratta, a Sumerian epic written around 1800 BCE

Although there is agreement among scholars as to the difference between prehistory and the history of early writing, there is disagreement as to when proto-writing became "real writing." The criteria are somewhat arbitrary. In the broadest sense, writing is a way of keeping track of information. It is made up of graphemes, which in turn can be made up of glyphs.

Many centuries of shattered inscriptions typically follow the advent of writing in a particular region. The presence of coherent texts in a culture's writing system is how historians determine a culture's "historicity".

Standard reconstruction of the development of writing. There is a possibility that the Egyptian script was invented independently from the Mesopotamian script.

A conventional "proto-writing to true writing" system follows a general series of developmental stages:

Picture writing system: glyphs (simplified pictures) directly represent objects and concepts. In connection with this, the following substages may be distinguished:

  • Mnemonic: glyphs primarily as a reminder.

  • Pictographic: glyphs directly represent an object or a concept such as (A) chronological, (B) notices, (C) communications, (D) totems, titles, and names, (E) religious, (F) customs, (G) historical, and (H) biographical.

  • Ideographic: graphemes are abstract symbols that directly represent an idea or concept.

Pre-cuneiform tags, with drawing of goat or sheep and number (probably "10"): "Ten goats", Al-Hasakah, 3300–3100 BCE, Uruk culture.

Transitional system: graphemes refer not only to the object or idea that it represents but to its name as well.

  • Phonetic system: graphemes refer to sounds or spoken symbols, and the form of the grapheme is not related to its meanings. This resolves itself into the following substages:

  • Verbal: grapheme (logogram) represents a whole word.

  • Syllabic: grapheme represents a syllable.

  • Alphabetic: grapheme represents an elementary sound.

Designs on some of the labels or token from Abydos, carbon-dated to circa 3400–3200 BC and among the earliest form of writing in Egypt. They are remarkably similar to contemporary clay tags from Uruk, Mesopotamia.

The best known picture writing system of ideographic or early mnemonic symbols are:

  • Jiahu symbols, carved on tortoise shells in Jiahu, c. 6600 BCE

  • Vinča symbols (Tărtăria tablets), c. 5300 BCE[24]

  • Early Indus script, c. 3100 BCE

In the Old World, true writing systems developed from neolithic writing in the Early Bronze Age (4th millennium BC).

Locations and timeframes

Comparative evolution

from pictograms to abstract shapes, in Mesopotamian cuneiforms, Egyptian hieroglyphs and Chinese characters

Proto-writing

The first writing systems of the Early Bronze Age were not a sudden invention. Rather, they were a development based on earlier traditions of symbol systems that cannot be classified as proper writing, but have many of the characteristics of writing. These systems may be described as "proto-writing". They used ideographic or early mnemonic symbols to convey information, but it probably directly contained no natural language. These systems emerged in the early Neolithic period, as early as the 7th millennium BC, and include:

  • The Jiahu symbols found carved in tortoise shells in 24 Neolithic graves excavated at Jiahu, Henan province, northern China, with radiocarbon dates from the 7th millennium BCE. Most archaeologists consider these not directly linked to the earliest true writing.

  • Vinča symbols, sometimes called the "Danube script", are a set of symbols found on Neolithic era (6th to 5th millennia BCE) artifacts from the Vinča culture of Central Europe and Southeast Europe.

  • The Dispilio Tablet of the late 6th millennium may also be an example of proto-writing.

  • The Indus script, which from 3500 BCE to 1900 BCE was used for extremely short inscriptions.

The Dispilio Tablet

The Dispilio tablet is a wooden tablet bearing inscribed markings, unearthed during George Hourmouziadis's excavations of Dispilio in Greece, and carbon 14-dated to 5202 (± 123) BC.

It was discovered in 1993 in a Neolithic lakeshore settlement that occupied an artificial island near the modern village of Dispilio on Lake Kastoria in Kastoria, Western Macedonia, Greece.

Even after the Neolithic, a number of societies used proto-writing as a transitional form before adopting formal writing. Such a mechanism might have existed in the quipu of the Incas (15th century CE), often known as "talking knots". Another example is the pictographs created by Uyaquk before the Central Alaskan Yup'ik language developed the Yugtun syllabary around 1900.

Ancient writing

The Bronze Age saw the development of writing in a wide range of cultures. Indus script, Egyptian hieroglyphs, Cretan hieroglyphs, Chinese logographs, Sumerian cuneiform writing, and the Olmec script of Mesoamerica are a few examples. Around 1600 BCE, the Chinese script most likely evolved apart from the Middle Eastern scripts. It is also generally accepted that the pre-Columbian Mesoamerican writing systems, which include the Olmec and Maya scripts, had separate origins. In 2000 BCE, it is believed that the first real alphabetic writing was created for Hebrew laborers in the Sinai by assigning Semitic values to mostly Egyptian hieratic characters (see History of the alphabet and Proto-Sinaitic alphabet).

Ethiopia's Geez writing system is regarded as Semitic. With roots in the Meroitic Sudanese ideogram system, it is most likely of semi-independent origin. The majority of alphabets used today are either direct descendants of this one invention, many through the Phoenician alphabet, or were designed in direct response to it. The early Old Italic alphabet and Plautus (c. 750–250 BCE) were separated by around 500 years in Italy, while the Elder Futhark inscriptions and early works like the Abrogans (c. 200–750 CE) are separated by a similar amount of time in the case of the Germanic peoples.

Cuneiform writing

The first Sumerian script was derived from a system of clay tokens used to denote different types of goods. This had developed into a system of keeping accounts by the end of the fourth millennium BC, utilizing a stylus with a circular form that was impressed into soft clay at various angles to record numbers. A pointed stylus was used to gradually add pictographic lettering on this to show what was being counted. Writing using a wedge-shaped stylus (hence the name "cuneiform") began to include phonetic features by the 29th century BCE and gradually replaced writing with a round stylus and a sharp stylus by about 2700–2500 BCE.

Cuneiform first started to represent Sumerian syllables around 2600 BCE. Ultimately, cuneiform writing evolved into a general-purpose system for writing numerals, syllables, and logograms. This alphabet was adapted to the Akkadian language starting in the 26th century BCE, and from there to others like Hurrian and Hittite. This writing system resembles Old Persian and Ugaritic scripts in appearance.

Hieroglyphics from Egypt

Literacy was concentrated among a well-educated elite of scribes, who played a crucial role in upholding the Egyptian empire through writing. To become scribes in the employ of temple, royal (pharaonic), and military authority, one had to come from a certain background.

According to Geoffrey Sampson, the general concept of expressing words from a language in writing was likely transmitted to Egypt via Sumerian Mesopotamia. Egyptian hieroglyphs "came into being a little after Sumerian script, and, possibly [were], invented under the influence of the latter." Despite the significance of early Egypt-Mesopotamia links, "no definitive judgment has been established as to the genesis of hieroglyphics in ancient Egypt" due to the lack of direct evidence. However, it is stated and agreed upon that "a very compelling argument can also be made for the independent development of writing in Egypt" and that "the evidence for such direct influence remains fragile."

Egyptian writing does suddenly appear at that time, but Mesopotamia has an evolutionary history of sign usage in tokens dating back to around 8000 BCE. Since the 1990s, discoveries of glyphs at Abydos, dated to between 3400 and 3200 BCE, may challenge the conventional idea that the Mesopotamian symbol system predates the Egyptian one. These glyphs were discovered in tomb U-J at Abydos; they were written on ivory and most likely served as labels for other items discovered there.

Even though he acknowledged that Egypt's geographic location made it a receptacle for many influences, Egyptian scholar Gamal Mokhtar maintained that the inventory of hieroglyphic symbols originated from "fauna and flora used in the signs [which] are essentially African" and that in regards to writing, "we have seen that a purely Nilotic, therefore African origin not only is not excluded, but probably reflects the reality."

Elamite writing

The unintelligible Proto-Elamite writing first appears around 3100 BCE. Around the latter third millennium, it is thought to have evolved into Linear Elamite, which was later supplanted by Elamite Cuneiform, which was adapted from Akkadian.

Indus script

Most inscriptions containing these symbols are extremely short, making it difficult to judge whether or not these symbols constituted a writing system used to record the as yet unidentified language(s) of the Indus Valley civilisation.

The Indus script has been assigned to markings and symbols discovered at numerous Indus Valley civilization sites due to the hypothesis that they were used to transcribe the Harappan language. It is disputed whether the script, which was in use from roughly 3500 to 1900 BCE, is a Bronze Age writing script (logographic-syllabic) or merely proto-writing symbols. According to analysis, it was written in boustrophedon or from right to left.

early SEMITIC ALPHABETS

Around 1800 BCE in Ancient Egypt, the first "abjads," which mapped individual symbols to individual phonemes but not necessarily each phoneme to a symbol, appeared as a representation of the language created there by Semitic workers. However, by that time, alphabetic principles had only a remote chance of being ingrained into Egyptian hieroglyphs for upwards of a millennium.

Did the Proto-Canaanite alphabet take its symbols independently of the hieroglyphs?

It is only until the end of the Bronze Age that the Proto-Sinaitic script separates into the Proto-Canaanite alphabet (c. 1400 BCE), Byblos syllabary, and the South Arabian alphabet (c. 1200 BCE). These early abjads remained of minor significance for several decades. The untranslated Byblos syllabary most likely had some influence on the Proto-Canaanite, which in turn provided inspiration for the Ugaritic alphabet (c. 1300 BCE).

Anatolian hieroglyphs

The Luwian language was written down using Anatolian hieroglyphs, a native hieroglyphic script found in western Anatolia. Around the fourteenth century BCE, it initially appeared on royal seals of the Luwians.

Chinese characters

The corpus of inscriptions on oracle bones and brass from the late Shang dynasty is the earliest authenticated example of the Chinese script that has been found so far. The oldest of these is believed to date from about 1200 BCE.

There have been recent finds of tortoise-shell carvings from around 6000 BCE, such as Jiahu Script and Banpo Script, but it is debatable whether or not the carvings are complex enough to be considered writing. 3,172 cliff carvings from the period between 6000 and 5000 BCE have been found near Damaidi in the Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. They contain 8,453 different characters, including images of the sun, moon, stars, gods, and scenes of grazing or hunting.

Replica

of ancient Chinese script on an oracle turtle shell

These pictographs are thought to resemble the first Chinese characters that have been confirmed to be written. Writing in China would predate Mesopotamian cuneiform, traditionally recognized as the first manifestation of writing, by about 2,000 years if it were to be considered a written language. However, it is more likely that the inscriptions represent a type of proto-writing, comparable to the modern European Vinca script.

Early Greek and Cretan scripts

Cretan relics include hieroglyphic writing (early-to-mid-2nd millennium BCE, MM I to MM III, overlapping with Linear A from MM IIA at the earliest). The Mycenaean Greek writing system, Linear B, has been decoded, but Linear A has not yet been. The three overlapping, but distinct, Aegean pre-alphabetic writing systems can be categorized according to their chronological order and geographic distribution as follows:

  • Cretan Hieroglyphic / Crete (eastward from the Knossos-Phaistos axis) / c. 2100−1700 BCE

  • Linear A / Crete (except extreme southwest), Aegean Islands (Kea, Kythera, Melos, Thera), Greek mainland (Laconia) and west Minor Asia (Miletus and maybe Troy) / c. 1800−1450 BCE

  • Linear B / Crete (Knossos), and mainland (Pylos, Mycenae, Thebes, Tiryns) / c. 1450−1200 BCE

The archaeological finds with signs of pre-alphabetic scripts in the Aegean

(Up) The finds with signs of Linear B script reach about 6,000 and constitute the majority of the pre-alphabetic written monuments of the Aegean.

(Middle) About 1,400 are the finds which imprint Linear A and make up a 11% of all pre-alphabetic inscriptions.

(Down) Cretan hieroglyphics occupies 2% of the available finds with only 400 finds.

Illustration: Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

Mesoamerica

The Cascajal Block, a stone slab with 3,000-year-old writing that predates the first Zapotec writing from around 500 BCE, was found in the Mexican state of Veracruz. It is an example of the oldest script in the Western Hemisphere.

Stela 12 and 13

from the southern end of Building L, in the Zapotec city of Monte Albán, Outside of Oaxaca, Mexico.

The Maya script is one of numerous pre-Columbian scripts found in Mesoamerica, and it appears to have been the most well-developed and extensively deciphered. The earliest clearly identifiable Maya inscriptions date to the third century BCE, and writing continued to be used until just before the arrival of the Spanish conquistadors in the sixteenth century BCE. A combination of logograms and syllabic symbols, utilized in Maya writing, is somewhat reminiscent of current Japanese writing.

IRON AGE WRITING

The Proto-Canaanite alphabet, which was used into the Iron Age, is all that the Phoenician alphabet is (conventionally taken from a cut-off date of 1050 BCE). The Greek and Aramaic alphabets were derived from this alphabet. They eventually gave rise to the writing systems that are currently used everywhere, from Western Asia to Africa and Europe. The Greek alphabet, on the other hand, was the first to use specific symbols to represent vowel sounds.

By Matt Baker

In the first centuries of the Common Era, the Greek and Latin alphabets gave rise to a number of European scripts, including the Runes, Gothic, and Cyrillic alphabets, while the Aramaic alphabet developed into the Hebrew, Arabic, and Syriac abjads, the latter of which spread as far as Mongolian script. The Ge'ez abugida originated from the South Arabian alphabet. According to some academics, the Indian Brahmic family also descended from the Aramaic alphabet.

GRAKLIANI HILL WRITING

At Georgia's Grakliani Hill, behind a fallen altar from a temple dedicated to a fertility goddess from the seventh century BCE, an obscure script was uncovered in 2015. Grakliani's other temples' inscriptions, which depict animals, people, or decorative features, are different from these ones. Although its letters are rumored to be connected to ancient Greek and Aramaic, the script has no similarities to any known alphabet. In contrast, the earliest Armenian and Georgian letters come from the fifth century CE, right after the respective nations converted to Christianity. The inscription looks to be the oldest local alphabet ever uncovered in the entire Caucasus region. An portion of the inscription measuring 31 by 3 inches had been unearthed by September 2015.

Grakliani script on the basement of altar of goddess of fertility (XI-X c. BC)

Vakhtang Licheli, director of the State University's Institute of Archaeology, claims that "The writings on the temple's two altars have been kept in remarkably good condition. While the pedestal of the second altar is entirely covered with writings, the first altar has few clay letters carved into it." Unpaid students made the discovery. Inscriptions from Grakliani Hill were sent to Miami Laboratory in 2016 for beta analytic radiocarbon dating, which revealed that they were created between c. 1005 and c. 950 BCE.

WRITING IN THE GRECO-ROMAN WORLD

When the Greeks adopted the Phoenician script for use with their own language in the early eighth century BCE, the history of the Greek alphabet officially began. The Greek and Phoenician alphabets share a lot of similarities in terms of their characters, and both alphabets nowadays are written in the same order. The Phoenician system's adapter(s) added three letters to the conclusion of the series, known as the "supplementals." The Greek alphabet evolved into a number of different forms.

Early Greek alphabet on pottery in the National Archaeological Museum, Athens

One was utilized in southern Italy and west of Athens and is known as Western Greek or Chalcidian. The other variant, known as Eastern Greek, was spoken by the Athenians and in modern-day Turkey before spreading over the rest of the Greek-speaking world. The Greeks initially elected to write like the Phoenicians, from right to left, but subsequently switched to left to right. The lines would then alternately read from left to right, then from right to left, and so on. On occasion, though, the writer would begin the next line where the preceding one ended. Up until the sixth century, this style of writing, called "boustrophedon," mirrored the course of an ox-drawn plough.

Italic scripts and Latin

Cippus Perusinus

Etruscan writing near Perugia, Italy, the precursor of the Latin alphabet

All of the contemporary European scripts have their roots in Greek. The Latin alphabet, named after the Latins, a central Italian people who came to rule Europe with the emergence of Rome, is the most widely used descendant of the Greek script. Around the fifth century BCE, the Etruscan civilization, which employed a multitude of Italic scripts descended from the western Greeks, taught the Romans how to write. The other Old Italic scripts have not survived in very large quantities due to the cultural hegemony of the Roman state, and the Etruscan language is largely extinct.

WRITING DURING THE MIDDLE AGES

Roman rule in Western Europe fell apart, and the Persian Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire became the main centers of literary development. Latin, which was never a major literary language, lost prominence quickly (except within the Roman Catholic Church). Greek and Persian were the two main literary languages, but Syriac and Coptic were also significant.

Arabic quickly became a significant literary language in the area as a result of the development of Islam in the 7th century. Greek's status as a scholarly language soon lost ground to Arabic and Persian. The Turkish and Persian languages now use Arabic script as their principal writing system. The development of the cursive scripts for Greek, the Slavic languages, Latin, and other languages was also greatly inspired by this script.

The Hindu-Arabic numeral system was also extended throughout Europe thanks to the Arabic language. The modern Spanish city of Cordoba had emerged as one of the world's leading intellectual hubs by the start of the second millennium and was home to the largest library at the time. Its location at the meeting point of the Islamic and Western Christian worlds encouraged intellectual growth and written exchange between the two cultures.

THE MODERN ERA AND THE RENAISSANCE

By the 14th century, Western Europe had experienced a renaissance, which had temporarily increased the significance of Greek while slowly restoring Latin's status as an important literary language. In Eastern Europe, particularly in Russia, a comparable but smaller emergence took place. As the Islamic Golden Era came to an end, Arabic and Persian also started to slowly lose ground. In order to codify the phonologies of the various languages, the Latin alphabet underwent several alterations as a result of the rebirth of literary development in Western Europe.

Writing has undergone steady change throughout history, in large part because of the emergence of new technologies. Technology advancements such as the printing press, computer, mobile phone, and pen have all changed how and what is written as well as the medium in which it is generated. Characters can now be generated with a button press rather than a hand motion, especially with the development of digital technology like the computer and the smartphone.

In Aegean Prehistory, Africa, Americas, Anatolia, Arabian Peninsula, Balkan Region, Byzantine Middle Ages, Central Asia-Iranian plateau, China-East Asia, Egypt's Dynastic Period, Egypt's Predynastic Period, Eurasian Steppe, Europe, Greco-Roman Egypt, Greece's Historical Period, Indus Valley, Japan, Late Period of Egypt, Levant, Medieval Egypt, Mesopotamia, Modern Egypt, Oceania-SE Asia, Paleontology, Rome Tags Greatest Inventions, Dimosthenis Vasiloudis
← Newer Posts Older Posts →
Featured
1100-year-old-female-buried-with-weapons-1280x801-1 (1).jpg
Jul 26, 2025
An Unusual 10th-Century Female Burial with Archery Gear Unearthed in Hungary
Jul 26, 2025
Read More →
Jul 26, 2025
collage.png
Jul 26, 2025
Helike: The Ancient Greek City Swallowed by the Sea but Never Lost
Jul 26, 2025
Read More →
Jul 26, 2025
Gemini_Generated_Image_ne0kntne0kntne0k.png
Jul 25, 2025
The Role of the Great Wall of China in Military Defense
Jul 25, 2025
Read More →
Jul 25, 2025
Gemini_Generated_Image_shbnu1shbnu1shbn.png
Jul 25, 2025
The Myth of the Minotaur: The Labyrinth of Crete
Jul 25, 2025
Read More →
Jul 25, 2025
Gemini_Generated_Image_grxw6tgrxw6tgrxw.png
Jul 25, 2025
The Worship of Huitzilopochtli: The Aztec God of War
Jul 25, 2025
Read More →
Jul 25, 2025
Gemini_Generated_Image_f2ufrqf2ufrqf2uf.png
Jul 25, 2025
The Role of the Colosseum in Roman Entertainment
Jul 25, 2025
Read More →
Jul 25, 2025
read more

Powered by The archaeologist