Foreign Words in Egyptian Magic Spells: Are They Minoan?

---

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

---

Sacred Sounds or Foreign Tongues? The Mystery of the Keftiu Incantations in Egyptian medical papyri: A Linguistic and Historical Assessment of Their Minoan Identity

Two brief magical incantations—(1) “sente kepe wej’ ejmentere kekere” and (2) “ebeksetesebeseje hmkt repej pewer’ smk”—appear in New Kingdom Egyptian medical papyri and are explicitly noted to be written in the “language of the Keftiu.” The term Keftiu is widely believed to refer to Minoan Crete and its people, based on iconographic and textual evidence from the 18th Dynasty and earlier. The first incantation comes from the so-called London Medical Papyrus (BM EA 10059), and the second from the Hearst Papyrus, now housed at the University of California, Berkeley. The first incantation concerns the so-called "Asiatic disease" (a case of disease from the Near East), and the second one refers to the disease samuna (possibly an infectious illness). These incantations were used as “spells” by Egyptian healers—possibly Minoan physicians residing in Egypt—to expel the evil believed to cause the illnesses.

These texts are among the rare direct attestations of what may be the Minoan language—transcribed into Egyptian script and preserved within magical-medical contexts. Because of the tantalizing nature of this possibility, they have been the subject of scholarly speculation since the early 20th century. But are they really Minoan? Or are they misunderstood renderings of Semitic, Anatolian, or other languages? What does current research say?

Minoan trade routs.

1. Historical Context and Early Interpretations

The first modern discussion of these texts came from Sir Arthur Evans, who included them in his monumental Scripta Minoa (1952). Evans noted that they were recorded in medical contexts and specifically labeled in the manuscripts as being in the language of the Keftiu. He cautiously interpreted them as perhaps representing the spoken Minoan language. Evans, however, remained cautious regarding the interpretation: he observed that only one word from the second incantation (hmkt) is clearly Egyptian, while all other elements appear foreign. He also noted that, although the texts seem to be “Keftiu” (i.e., of Cretan origin), the very reference to an “Asiatic” (Semitic) disease and possibly to two deities of Asiatic provenance raises questions about whether the incantations genuinely reflect Cretan (Minoan) content. In other words, Evans had already pointed out early on that these foreign words may not be purely Minoan but could include elements from the Near East.

In the early 20th century, scholars like W. Wreszinski, H. Th. Bossert, and A. H. Sayce examined these texts. Wreszinski first published the London Medical Papyrus (1912), noting that incantations 32 and 33 refer to diseases “ttmkm” and “smk” respectively and label one of them explicitly as in the “language of the Keftiu.”

London Medical Papyrus; fragment of text with Kaftiw incantations is marked by whitelines (source: Kyriakidis 2002: 215)

Bossert offered the most imaginative interpretation, claiming that the first incantation contains Anatolian deity names—Sandon and Kubaba (Kybebe)—embedded within it, suggesting a link to Hittite or Luwian religious traditions. Sayce also accepted that these fragments could be Minoan, but emphasized their unknown linguistic nature.

Arthur Evans, despite his deep interest, was cautious: he recognized only one clearly Egyptian word (hmkt in the second incantation), noting that the rest of the content appeared non-Egyptian. He accepted that the texts may represent Keftiu (i.e., Minoan) language, but warned that little could be said about them with certainty.

Other scholars, such as G. A. Wainwright, controversially suggested that Keftiu might actually refer to Cilicia rather than Crete, proposing a more Anatolian origin for these texts. However, this theory was eventually rejected by most Egyptologists and Aegean archaeologists, who maintain that Keftiu corresponds to Minoan Crete.

Text of the spell (image source – Wreszinski 1912: 151)

2. Structure and Transmission of the Incantations

The two incantations are brief, grammatically obscure, and written phonetically using Egyptian hieratic signs. In both cases, the scribes attempt to record foreign words in a readable Egyptian form. Only the second incantation contains determinatives—classifying signs that hint at grammatical categories like “man,” “disease,” “god,” or “motion.”

• First incantation (London Medical Papyrus, no. 32):
  sente kepe wej’ ejmentere kekere
  Possibly linked to deities (Sandon, Kubaba?) and described as treating “the disease ttmkm” (unknown).

• Second incantation (Hearst Papyrus):
  ebeksetesebeseje hmkt repej pewer’ smk
  Associated with “disease smk” and includes the Egyptian word hmkt, possibly a known term for a spirit or illness.

The inclusion of foreign language incantations in Egyptian medical texts was a recognized practice—certain magical texts incorporate Semitic or Nubian phrases. The explicit designation of these two as “Keftiu language” thus signals that the Egyptians themselves regarded them as foreign—likely from a region with ritual or medical authority.

Menkheperreseneb. From left to right: 'Prince of Keftiu', 'Prince of Hatti', 'Prince of Tunip' (Syrian figures) and Aegean figure, facsimile (after Davies 1936:Plate XXI). Source

3. Modern Linguistic Analysis and Interpretative Approaches

Contemporary scholarship has taken a far more cautious and methodological approach:

3.1 General Position

The scholarly consensus holds that the incantations are most likely non-Egyptian and non-Semitic in structure and phonology. However, this does not prove they are definitively Minoan. The incantations’ extreme brevity makes secure interpretation nearly impossible.

3.2 Minoan Hypothesis

Most researchers today accept that, since the texts are explicitly labeled “language of the Keftiu,” and Keftiu is strongly identified with Crete, they likely represent some form of the Minoan language—possibly in a magical register.

Evangelos Kyriakidis (2002) cautiously notes that although the incantations cannot be translated or grammatically parsed, their phonological patterns do not contradict what is known from Linear A. However, no Linear A word has been definitively matched to any element of the incantations.

3.3 Anatolian/hattic Hypothesis

Some linguists—especially Alexander Akulov—have proposed more radical theories: that the language of the incantations shows affinities with Hattic (a pre-Indo-European language of Anatolia). Akulov analyzes grammatical morphemes within the incantations that appear to follow Hattic-like verb structures, possessive suffixes, and pronominal markers.

He interprets, for example, sabujajəjədʒa in the second incantation as a compound verb with personal markers resembling Hattic constructions. However, this view is highly speculative and not widely accepted in mainstream Aegean or Hittitological studies.

3.4 Rejection of Semitic Hypothesis

Richard Steiner and others have decisively rejected the idea that the texts are in a Semitic language, despite the diseases being labeled “Asiatic.” While some words (e.g., samuna) may derive from Semitic roots, the grammar and structure of the incantations do not align with Semitic syntax.

Senenmut. Three remaining Aegean figures, facsimile (after Davies 1936: Pl. XIV). Source

4. Theological and Magical Elements

The second incantation includes two divine names (Ratsiya, Erupa and Amaya), with accompanying Egyptian determinatives marking them as gods. This suggests that the Keftiu language had a pantheon unknown to Egyptians, or at least unfamiliar deity names. These theonyms do not resemble known Egyptian, Semitic, or Greek deities clearly, though speculative links have been made to Rhea and Maia or Kubaba.

The presence of foreign deities within the incantation strengthens the case for an independent Minoan religious tradition, at least partially captured here in Egyptian transmission.

Conclusion

The two Keftiu incantations found in Egyptian papyri constitute a rare window into a language of the Late Bronze Age, which the ancient Egyptians associated with Crete. Contemporary research converges on the idea that these incantations likely reflect the Minoan (pre-Greek) language, though possibly enriched with “magical vocabulary” borrowed from neighboring cultures. The early theories of Evans and his contemporaries—that these are indeed Minoan texts transcribed in Egyptian script—have not been rejected. On the contrary, they remain the starting point and the most logical interpretation, now approached with greater scholarly rigor. Evans’ view is broadly accepted in principle (that the language is that of the Keftiu/Minoans), but the early attempts to "translate" the incantations are now largely considered invalid or speculative.

No clear linguistic evidence has yet been found linking these incantations directly to the known vocabulary of Linear A or any other Aegean language, primarily because we lack a deciphered lexicon for comparison. Minor similarities (such as the aforementioned KA-PA, I-JA, etc.) suggest continuity, but do not prove it. Meanwhile, efforts to connect the texts with Anatolian languages (like Hattic) offer a tempting image of a Minoan language that did not evolve in isolation, but rather was influenced by—and perhaps genetically related to—other languages. If true, this would position the Minoans linguistically closer to populations of Asia Minor, rather than as an entirely isolated case.

In any case, the Keftiu incantations remain an object of ongoing research and debate. It is noteworthy how such a short text has inspired such a wide array of theories—evidence of its significance for our understanding of prehistoric Aegean civilization. For now, the most prudent conclusion is: these phrases appear to be Minoan, but their content suggests a complex magical vocabulary with international influences. Their full decipherment will likely only come if and when Linear A is decoded or if new bilingual texts are discovered. Until then, the Keftiu incantations remain a mystery—a lingering echo of a language once spoken in the halls of Knossos, still beckoning us to uncover its secrets.

---

REFERENCES

• Evans, Arthur J. – Scripta Minoa: The Written Documents of Minoan Crete

• Wreszinski, Walter – The Hearst medical papyrus

• Akulov, Alexander – A Minoan Deity from the London Medicine Papyrus

• Akulov, Alexander – Keftiw and Hattic Hypothesis

• Akulov, Alexander – Asiatic Disease Spell Revisited

• Kyriakidis, Evangelos – Indications on the Nature of the Language of the Keftiw from Egyptian Sources

• Steiner, Richard – Northwest Semitic Incantations in an Egyptian Medical Papyrus of the Fourteenth Century B.C.E.

• Giannakoulas, Alexandros – Black Asclepius, White Imhotep

The Mysterious Inscription of the Negau B Helmet and the Relationship Between Runic and Italic Alphabets

---

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

---

Historical Context and Archaeological Background

In 1811, a hoard of 26 bronze helmets was discovered at Ženjak (Negau), in what is today Negova, Slovenia​. These helmets date to the late Iron Age (ca. 450–350 BC) and are of the Etruscan vetulonic type, indicating they were Etruscan-made but found far north of Etruria​. The cache appears to have been ritually buried around 50 BC, possibly as an offering shortly before the Roman annexation of the region. Notably, helmets of this “Negau type” were often worn by priests or dignitaries by that time, suggesting the deposit had ceremonial significance​. This find reflects a cross-cultural milieu: Etruscan-crafted objects in a region inhabited by Celtic tribes (the Noricum area) and in proximity to Rhaetian and Illyrian cultures. It was in this context that one helmet, known as Negau B, bore a short but fascinating inscription.

The Negau B Inscription: Script and Reading

The Negau B helmet inscription is incised on the bronze helmet and is written right-to-left in a Northern Etruscan (North Italic) alphabet​. This script, sometimes called a sub-Alpine or Rhaetic alphabet, was derived from Etruscan and was used in the surrounding regions of Rhaetia, Noricum, Veneto, and Pannonia in the last centuries BC​. The inscription can be transliterated as: hariχastiteiva (often segmented as Hariχasti Teiva)​. (The symbol χ here represents a sound like [ḱ/h] or possibly a g, since Etruscan script lacked a distinct letter for voiced g.) The text is brief – essentially two word-like units – and lacks obvious dividers, though it is generally read as two terms.

Alphabetic characteristics: The letters belong to a North Italic epigraphic tradition, not the runic alphabet; earlier scholars once speculated the Negau inscription might be an proto-runic text, but it is now agreed to be in a genuine North Etruscan script that pre-dates the creation of the runes​. The letter forms closely resemble those of the Magrè alphabet (a Northern Etruscan variant), consistent with other inscriptions found in the Eastern Alps. The writing’s right-to-left direction is typical of Etruscan and Rhaetic writing, and the inscription shows no word-final inflections or punctuation marks. Due to the helmet’s corrosion and archaic letter-forms, reading the text has been challenging, and various interpretations have been proposed over the years.

Reading and transliteration: Most scholars today interpret the text as the personal name Harigasti followed by a second term teiva​. In epigraphic transliteration, it is often given as hariχas-ti teiva, where the -ti likely corresponds to the end of the name Hari-gastiz in Proto-Germanic (with -z not written). The entire inscription is thus read as Harigasti teiva, with a probable meaning relating to a person named Harigast. As we will see, the exact translation of teiva is debated, but this pairing of a name plus an epithet is the prevailing reading.

Linguistic Significance: Harigastiz, teiva, and the Germanic Sound Shift

If the Harigasti teiva reading is correct, the Negau B text holds great linguistic significance as an early Germanic-language inscription. Harigast (Proto-Germanic Harigastiz) is almost universally recognized as a Germanic personal name​. The name can be analyzed as hari- “army” and -gastiz “guest/stranger” – a compound structure typical of Germanic names. Its presence in a likely 2nd–1st century BC context makes it one of the earliest attestations of a Germanic name in writing. It suggests that Germanic-speaking individuals were present in or around the Alpine region by that time, interacting with literate cultures. Indeed, the village of Ženjak (Negau) was later (briefly) renamed Harigast during the Nazi period due to the prominence of this name on the helmet​, underscoring its interpretation as a Germanic personal name.

The second term teiva is what elevates the inscription from onomastic interest to broader linguistic importance. Scholars have proposed that teiva is a Germanic word cognate with Latin deus (“god”) – deriving from Proto-Indo-European deiwo-, “divine being, god”. In Proto-Germanic, the expected reflex of PIE d (as in deiwo-) is t (as in teiwaz) according to Grimm’s Law, the first Germanic sound shift. Thus, teiva is interpreted as related to Proto-Germanic *teiwaz “god”​. If so, the Negau helmet provides tangible evidence of Grimm’s Law in action: the Latin word deus (from deiwo-) corresponds to teiwaz > teiva in Germanic, demonstrating the shift of /d/ to /t/. This would make teiva effectively meaning “divine one” or “godly”. Tom Markey (2001) further argues that in this context teiva should be understood as “priest”, i.e. one who is god-related​. In other words, Harigast(i) teiva could mean “Harigast the priest” – paralleling how other Negau helmets list a person’s name followed by a religious or honorific title​.

From a historical linguist’s perspective, the implications for dating Grimm’s Law are significant. If the inscription indeed dates to the 3rd–2nd century BC (as many archaeologists maintain​), then the Germanic sound shift (which turned Proto-Indo-European d into t, etc.) must have been in effect by that time​. This pushes the timeline for Proto-Germanic differentiation well back into the mid-1st millennium BC. In fact, the Negau B text would be the earliest known example of a shifted Germanic word​, earlier than the next earliest evidence (e.g. Roman-era Germanic names or the 1st century AD testimony of Tacitus) by at least two centuries​. It’s essentially a pre-runic Germanic inscription, showing that Germanic speakers not only existed but were engaging with writing systems long before the Roman era.

Inscription on helmet Negau B. The inscription reads right-to-left.

Peter1936F - Own work

Interpretative Debates and Competing Theories

Despite the elegant interpretation of Harigasti teiva as “Harigast the priest” or “Harigast (the) divine,” there has been considerable scholarly debate. Competing interpretations highlight the challenges of reading such a short inscription in an ancient script:

• Tom Markey’s Germanic–Rhaetic Thesis (2001): Markey’s analysis is one of the most comprehensive modern studies. He accepts Harigasti teiva as a Germanic phrase, but suggests the inscription reflects a Germanic phrase mediated through Rhaetic​. Rhaetic was the language of the Alpine region, written in the same North Etruscan script, and likely spoken near Negau. Markey argues that the carver or context may have been Rhaetic, which could explain certain anomalies – notably the absence of an expected grammatical ending on Harigasti. In Proto-Germanic, a masculine name like Harigastiz might bear a final -z in the nominative, yet the inscription shows Harigasti with no -z. Markey proposes that a Rhaetic scribe inscribing a Germanic name might have omitted the unfamiliar ending​. He also draws parallels to the inscriptions on another helmet (Negau A): that helmet bears four short inscriptions which Markey reads as personal names with epithets or titles (e.g., Dubni banuabi “of Dubnos the pig-slayer”; sirago turbi “astral priest of the troop”; Iars’e esvii “Iarsus the divine”)​. Most of those names are Celtic, followed by what seem to be honorific or religious designations. By analogy, Hariχasti teiva would fit the same pattern: Harigast (name) followed by teiva (title)​. Markey thus envisions a multilingual interface at Negau, where a Germanic individual named Harigast was recorded by a Rhaetic (or heavily Rhaetic-influenced) scribe in an Etruscan script amid a primarily Celtic-speaking community​.

• Alternate Readings (Rhaetic or Venetic): Prior to the Germanic interpretation gaining favor, some scholars suggested non-Germanic readings. For example, A. Must (1957) interpreted the text as Hariχas Titieva, seeing it not as Germanic at all but as a Rhaetic personal name​. In Must’s view, the first element Hariχas could be Indo-European (but perhaps Venetic or another Alpine language rather than Germanic), and Titieva as an Etruscan or Rhaetic word – essentially positing a mixed-language name phrase​. This kind of interpretation underscores that with such limited context, scholars can arrive at very different linguistic attributions (Germanic vs. Celtic vs. Rhaetic), depending on how they assign sounds to the letters and parse the words. However, the identification of Harigast as a Germanic name has become “almost universally” accepted in recent decades​, largely due to the consistency of hari- and -gast elements with known Germanic lexicon.

• Jeremy J. Smith’s Critique (2009): Historical linguist Jeremy J. Smith urges caution about using the Negau helmet as proof of Grimm’s Law or early Germanic writing. He acknowledges that teiva has been argued as cognate with Latin divus/deus, indicating a d > t shift, and that many date the inscription to the 3rd–2nd century BC​. “The Negau helmet inscription is often taken as evidence for the operation of Grimm’s Law,” he notes​. However, Smith outlines several problems: (1) The dating is uncertain – while the helmet itself is 4th century BC, the inscription could have been incised later (some suggest even in the 1st century BC). Without a precise context, claiming it as 3rd century BC linguistic evidence is tricky. (2) The interpretation is not ironclad – Smith points out that teiva might not mean “priest” at all; it could be a second name or an epithet. He mentions the possibility that Harigasti Teiva might be understood on the model of Roman honorifics, akin to calling someone “Divine Harigast” (cf. divus Augustus, “the divine Augustus”)​. In that case, teiva could mean “divine” rather than specifically “priest,” and Harigast might even be an epithet or deified figure, rather than a literal person’s name + title. (3) Cultural context: Smith also raises an archaeological objection – traditionally, Germanic warriors of that era did not wear bronze helmets, preferring leather caps for mobility​. The Negau helmets are Etruscan-made and were likely part of a Celtic cultural context. How did a Germanic name appear on one? Smith notes that Germanic mercenaries serving Celtic chieftains (a practice recorded by classical authors) could explain it​. A Germanic warrior or priest named Harigast in a Celtic host might have adopted local equipment and been commemorated with an inscription in the local script. In sum, Smith does not deny the Germanic reading, but he cautions that using Negau B as “conclusive evidence” of the sound shift or of a broad Germanic literacy is problematic​. It’s a tantalizing data point, but one with uncertainties.

In light of these debates, the consensus today tentatively accepts Harigasti teiva as a Germanic phrase (hence its frequent citation in linguistic literature), but scholars remain careful about the interpretation of teiva and the broader implications. What is clear is that the script is North Italic, not runic, and thus the Negau inscription, while Germanic in language, “precedes the formation of the Runic alphabet”​. It represents a special instance of early Germanic writing outside the later runic tradition.

North Etruscan to Runic: The Question of Alphabetic Transmission

The Negau B helmet inscription holds a pivotal place in discussions of the origin of the runic alphabet. It is a concrete example of a Germanic-language text written in an Italic alphabet, suggesting a possible link between the alphabets of the ancient Italic peoples (like the Etruscans or Venetii) and the Runic script developed by Germanic peoples in the later centuries. Scholars have long proposed that the Elder Futhark runes (the oldest runic alphabet, in use by ~150–400 AD) were inspired by or even directly borrowed from Northern Etruscan alphabets​. The Negau B inscription, “dating to the 2nd century BC”, in a north Etruscan script but spelling a Germanic name (Harigast), is often cited as supporting evidence for this North Etruscan thesis​.

Key points in examining the runic connection include chronology, letter forms, and pathways of cultural contact:

• Chronology: If Germanic peoples were acquainted with writing by the 2nd or 1st century BC (as Negau B implies), there was a substantial time window for the adaptation of an alphabet before the first known runic inscriptions (~2nd century AD). The transmission process remains uncertain (as no “intermediate” Germanic inscriptions are known from 0–100 AD), but two main scenarios are debated​. One hypothesis is that knowledge of writing spread via West Germanic tribes along the Upper Rhine and Danube (contacts with Celto-Etruscan communities), eventually reaching the North; another posits East Germanic groups (like the Goths) learned writing from Alpine or Balkan interactions and carried it northward​. In either case, the late Iron Age cultural interactions evidenced by Negau make it plausible that Germanic elites had exposure to alphabets well before Roman influence. In fact, Giuliano and Larissa Bonfante have argued that Germanic peoples could have adopted a North Italic alphabet (specifically the Venetic script) as early as the 3rd century BC or earlier​. They note that after the Roman conquest of Cisalpine Gaul (200+ BC), the Venetic script fell out of use in its home region, potentially leaving an opening for its transfer to neighboring groups​.

• Letter Form Parallels: Scholars who support a North Italic origin for runes point to the graphical similarity of many rune shapes to letters in Alpine alphabets. For instance, the Elder Futhark letters ᚠ (fehu = F), ᚱ (raido = R), ᛃ (jera = J) and others closely resemble characters found in Alpine (Rhaetic) inscriptions and Etruscan writing. A study by Bernard Mees (2000) highlighted that only a few runes (perhaps 5 out of 24) have no clear counterpart in the Bolzano script (a form of Rhaetic alphabet), meaning the majority of runes do correspond in form to North Italic letters​. The angular, stroke-based form of runes, often thought to be an adaptation to carving on wood, is also characteristic of North Italic epigraphy on stone and metal, where straight lines are dominant and curves are minimized​. The Negau helmet’s letters, for example, are angular and suited to incising on metal. Such similarities strengthen the case that Germanic runes were not invented entirely from scratch or purely on the model of the Latin alphabet, but rather were inspired by the older alphabets of northern Italy which Germanic individuals encountered. The Negau B inscription shows that at least one Germanic individual did utilize a North Italic script. It is easy to imagine that over time, Germanic scribes might have adapted those letters to their own needs, eventually creating a distinct script (the runic futhark) by the early centuries AD.

• Possible Transmission Paths: The cultural conduit for this alphabetic transmission likely involved trade, war, and migration. The Eastern Alps in the late Iron Age were a crossroads: Celtic tribes (like the Taurisci and Norici) traded with the Etruscans and Romans, Rhaetian peoples inhabited alpine valleys, and Germanic tribes (such as the Suebi, and later the Marcomanni or even the Cimbri) periodically moved southward or served as mercenaries. We know from Roman historians (e.g. Diodorus Siculus) that Celts employed Germanic warriors by the 1st century BC​. These warriors could have learned of writing during their service. Another possibility is through diplomatic gifts or loot: an object like an inscribed helmet or a sword with an inscription could have reached Germanic territory and been imitated. By the time the first runic inscriptions appear in Denmark and northern Germany (e.g. the Meldorf fibula, c. 50 AD, or the Vimose weapons, 2nd century AD​), the concept of writing had likely been percolating through Germanic societies for generations. The Negau B helmet stands as tangible evidence of such early transmission – it shows that a Germanic name was rendered in an Italic script in a context predating any known runes. Thus, it bridges the gap between the Italic alphabetic tradition and the emergent Germanic runic tradition. As Jeremy J. Smith observes, “the North Italic system seems to derive from that used by the ancient Etruscans… North Italic lettering is seen by many scholars as a source – possibly the source – of the Germanic futhark”, given the clear parallels between the two systems​.

In summary, the Negau B inscription strongly supports the idea that the Italic alphabets (Etruscan, Rhaetic, Venetic) were the blueprint for the runic alphabet. It provides a chronological anchor in the 2nd–1st century BC for when Germanic peoples first accessed alphabetic writing. Combined with other evidence, it suggests the runes were likely created not in isolation, but through cultural contact and adaptation of these earlier scripts.

Cultural and Linguistic Interactions in the Late Iron Age

Both the inscription and the archaeological context of Negau B offer a rich picture of cultural interaction among Italic, Celtic, Rhaetic, and Germanic peoples. The helmet itself is Etruscan-crafted, the practice of dedicating helmets is common in Celtic ritual, the script used is North Italic (associated with Etruscan/Rhaetic writers), the content is arguably Germanic language, and it was buried in a region inhabited by Celts under looming Roman domination. This convergence highlights a multilingual and multi-ethnic environment in the Eastern Alpine late Iron Age.

Archaeologically, the presence of Celtic names with Latin or Etruscan titles on the other Negau helmets (e.g. Iarsus the divine on Negau A) suggests a fusion of Celtic personal names with Italic linguistic influence (the word esvii “divine” appears to be adapted from Latin divius). In that same setting, the name Harigast appearing shows that Germanic individuals were part of this cultural sphere. Perhaps Harigast was a Germanic druid or priest serving in a Celtic community, or a mercenary captain accorded an honorific epithet (teiva). The inscription might have been a dedication of the helmet to a sanctuary, identifying the giver or honoree. The fact that a Rhaetic/Etruscan script was used implies that someone in the community had the knowledge of writing – likely learned from the Italic world – and applied it to record names of varied linguistic origin.

Linguistically, the Negau B text exemplifies how languages can influence each other in contact zones. A Germanic phrase was written with letters designed for Etruscan/Rhaetic, requiring phonetic compromises (such as using χ for /g/) and possibly dropping Germanic inflections. It underscores that writing systems are not bound to a single language: scripts often jump cultural boundaries through trade or conquest. Here, writing was a medium shared across cultural lines – a Latin or Etruscan trader might have taught a local Celt or Germanic how to inscribe letters. The flow of religious concepts is also hinted: if teiva indeed relates to teiwaz “god”, it connects to a Proto-Indo-European concept of divinity (cf. Celtic Teutates, Latin deus) shared among different groups. Some scholars even speculate that “Harigast” might have been deified or mythologized, though evidence is scant. What is clear is that the Germanic pantheon would later include a war-god Tiwaz (Old Norse Týr), whose name comes from the same root as teiva. Thus, the Negau inscription might reflect not just linguistic but also religious syncretism, blending a Germanic name with a title derived from a pan-Indo-European word for a deity.

From a historical perspective, the Negau helmets (and B in particular) illuminate a period of dynamic interaction just before the Roman era. We see a snapshot of coexistence and exchange: Celtic chieftains, Italian traders, Rhaetian scribes, and Germanic warriors all in contact. The Roman conquest would soon overlay a new layer of cultural influence (Latin language and writing), but the inscriptions of Negau capture a pre-Roman snapshot of cultural globalization in antiquity. These findings align with other evidence of cross-regional links, such as Celtic mercenaries in Etruscan armies, or Germanic materials in Celtic graves.

Conclusion

The inscription of the Negau B helmet, though only a few characters long, has outsized importance for both archaeology and linguistics. It provides a rare glimpse of the Germanic language in the 2nd–1st century BC and demonstrates that Germanic speakers had access to writing well before the runic script was developed. If read as Harigast teiva, it likely records “Harigast the priest” or “Harigast the divine,” marking possibly the earliest recorded Germanic personal name and an attestation of the Germanic sound shift (Grimm’s Law) in progress​. The debates surrounding its interpretation – Germanic vs. Rhaetic, priest vs. god, early vs. late date – highlight the careful interdisciplinary detective work required to understand such ancient texts. Regardless of the exact reading, Negau B underscores the intimate connections between the Italic alphabets and the runic alphabet that would arise centuries later, supporting the view that the runic letters were inspired by North Italic scripts​.

Finally, the Negau B helmet stands as a testament to the cultural interactions of the late Iron Age: a single artifact encapsulating Etruscan artistry, Celtic ritual practice, Rhaetic writing, and Germanic language. It reminds us that ancient Europe was not a set of isolated ethnic blocks, but rather a web of contacts and exchanges. The Harigast inscription, therefore, is more than just an epigraphic puzzle – it is evidence of a protohistoric multicultural encounter, one that sowed the seeds for the rich tapestry of European linguistic and cultural development in the centuries that followed.

Sources:

• Teržan, Biba (2012). “Negau (Negova), Slowenien: Benedikt V,” in Sievers, Urban & Ramsl (eds.), Lexikon zur keltischen Archäologie.

• Markey, Tom (2001). “A Tale of Two Helmets: The Negau A and B Inscriptions,” Journal of Indo-European Studies 29 (1–2): 69–172. (Interpretation of Harigasti teiva as Germanic, with Rhaetic mediation)​

• Smith, Jeremy J. (2009). Old English: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge UP, p. 125.

• Mees, Bernard (2000). “The North Etruscan Thesis of the Origin of the Runes,” Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 115: 33–82.

• Bonfante, Larissa & Bonfante, Giuliano (2002). The Etruscan Language: An Introduction.

• Wikipedia contributors. “Negau helmets.” Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, last modified 2023.

The Global Motif of Confronted Animals: Diffusion or Independent Development?

---

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

---

The motif of two animals standing face-to-face in a symmetrical arrangement appears with remarkable frequency in ancient arts and ritual representations around the world. It constitutes a universal visual theme, where two animals are depicted confronting each other, usually symmetrically, often flanking a central figure or symbol. This motif is found from Mesopotamia and Egypt to Greece, Etruria, and Persia, and also in cultures of Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Oceania. This article examines:

• The origin of the motif and its earliest appearances.

• Examples from various civilizations, with emphasis on Mediterranean and Near Eastern cultures (Mesopotamia, Egypt, Minoan-Mycenaean Greece, Etruscans, Persians, Hittites, Phoenicians, etc.), but also references from Africa, Asia, the Americas, and Oceania.

• Anthropological and psychological interpretations regarding the motif’s spread to geographically and culturally distant societies.

• A brief overview of the motif’s development and continuity from antiquity to the 19th century.

Origin of the Motif

The origin of the confronted animals motif is rooted in the prehistoric era of the Near East. The earliest known examples appear around the end of the 4th millennium BC in Mesopotamia. In prehistoric seals and vessels from the region, already by the 5th–4th millennium BCE, we find pairs of animals in symmetrical arrangement. For example, cylinder seals from Uruk (~3000 BCE) depict two opposing lionesses (often described as mythical "serpopards" with features of serpent and leopard). Many seals also show two facing goats flanking a Tree of Life at the center, often placed upon a platform or hill—a composition already recognized from the 4th millennium BCE. These early depictions establish a motif of symmetry: two animals in perfect balance around a central axis, offering aesthetic harmony and likely symbolic meaning.

At the same time, other Late Neolithic cultures show similar imagery. A frequently cited example is the seated deity of Çatalhöyük (Neolithic Anatolia, ~6000 BCE), flanked by two felines in symmetrical pose. Some scholars consider this figure a primordial example of the Mistress of Animals archetype in the prehistoric world. Though the deity likely symbolized fertility and protection, the layout with two confronted animals already provides one of the earliest samples of the motif.

Seated Woman of Çatalhöyük is a Neolithic Clay and Ceramic Artifact created in 6000BCE. It lives at the Museum of Anatolian Civilizations in Turkey. The image is © Nevit Dilmen, and used according to Educational Fair Use, and tagged Women and Goddess. Source

In Egypt and Mesopotamia of the 4th millennium BCE, we find parallel developments. A famous Egyptian artifact, the Narmer Palette (~3100 BCE), features on one side two large felines facing each other, their elongated necks intertwined in a symmetrical spiral design. These lionesses (originally interpreted as mythical "serpopards") are thought to symbolize the two kingdoms of Predynastic Upper and Lower Egypt, united under a single ruler. Their union, visualized through the interlinked animals, may reflect the consolidation under Pharaoh Narmer, with the lionesses representing the guardian deities of each kingdom (the lioness-goddesses Bast and Sekhmet). Thus, already at the dawn of history, the motif of confronted animals is associated with strong symbolism of unity and dominion.

Another ancient Egyptian artifact, the Gebel el-Arak knife handle (ca. 3400 BCE), depicts on one side a man—possibly a god or hero—between two confronting lions, which he grasps with his hands. This scene is an early instance of the related motif known as the Master of Animals, where a central human figure dominates between two symmetrically opposed animals. Overall, in both Mesopotamia and Egypt of the 4th–3rd millennium BCE, the motif appears fully developed: animals in opposing symmetry, either confronting each other or under the control of a central figure. The motif’s origin, therefore, can be traced to these early agrarian civilizations of the Fertile Crescent, from which it would spread widely.

Examples from Ancient Civilizations

Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East

In the civilizations of ancient Mesopotamia, the motif of confronted animals appears from the earliest seal impressions and remains popular throughout the 3rd and 2nd millennia BCE. Sumerian and Akkadian cylinder seals often depict symmetrical scenes with animals—two lions or bulls facing each other, sometimes with a human or demigod hero standing between them, restraining the animals. A recurring theme is the "naked hero" battling two lions or bulls simultaneously, symbolizing strength and civilization’s triumph over wild nature.

In other depictions, a tree or sacred pole appears at the center, with two ibexes (or other animals) symmetrically flanking it, forming the image of the Tree of Life. This motif—of a tree flanked by confronted animals—is extremely common in the art of the ancient Near East and the Mediterranean. It is often interpreted as symbolizing fertility and the vital force of nature, with the animals either protecting or feeding from the tree.

In Hittite and broader Anatolian tradition, similar patterns emerge. Although monumental Hittite art of the 2nd millennium BC left fewer relief scenes of two confronted animals flanking a central deity, it is known that the Hittites adopted many motifs from Mesopotamia. The gates of Hittite cities, such as the capital Hattusa, were adorned with carved stone lions placed symmetrically at each side of the entrance as threshold guardians.

Additionally, Hittite seals and small reliefs from the 18th–17th centuries BC (during the Assyrian trade colony period in Anatolia) abound in scenes of heroes or deities battling symmetrically arranged animals. Later, in the imperial period of the Hittites, the motif of the god standing atop a deer (a hunting deity) emerged, symbolizing dominance over wild beasts, although it is not a direct instance of the confronted animals motif. Overall, the Near East developed a rich iconographic repertoire in which the symmetrical depiction of animals was often associated with sacred power and protection.

The Phoenicians and other Eastern Mediterranean cultures of the 1st millennium BC further disseminated these motifs. Phoenician ivory carvings and metal vessels frequently depict sacred trees flanked by symmetrical animals such as ibexes, sphinxes, or lions, reflecting influences from Mesopotamia and Assyria. The motif of the Tree of Life flanked by confronted animals appears, for example, in Phoenician jewelry and reliefs, possibly symbolizing divine blessing and guardianship—where the paired animals act as protectors of the central sacred symbol.

In Imperial Persia (Achaemenid period, 6th–4th century BCE), although official art preferred continuous friezes of processional animals, there are indications of continuity for the confronted animals motif. The famous friezes of Persepolis feature lions and bulls in dynamic interactions—not symmetrically confronted but often in combat. However, in Persian decorative art and textiles, the confronted animals motif flourished. A notable example is the Persian decorative medallion (roundel) in textiles and carpets, often depicting two animals facing each other within a circular frame—a motif rooted in the tradition of animal compositions from the Asian steppes.

This Persian tradition was transmitted via the Silk Road to China during the Tang dynasty, where Chinese weavers adopted the motif in their own designs. Thus, the pair of confronted animals, often framed within decorative borders, became an international motif in textile and minor arts of late antiquity.

Jade Openwork Disc with Dragon and Phoenix, China, 2nd century BC, Museum of the Mausoleum of the Nanyue King

Ancient Egypt

Beyond the Predynastic examples already discussed—such as the Narmer Palette and the Gebel el-Arak knife—the motif continued in various forms during the Pharaonic period. Ceremonial palettes from the late 4th millennium BC were often adorned with reliefs showing confronted animals. Besides lionesses, these included hippopotamuses, giraffes, geese, and other creatures. Even symmetrical representations of trees or palm fronds appeared, establishing a recurring motif of bilateral symmetry.

In Egyptian religious art, the motif became closely associated with protection and order. Confronted lionesses could symbolize guardian deities such as Bast and Sekhmet, flanking the pharaoh. In Egyptian mythology, the motif of two lions seated back-to-back (anti-confronted), known as Akeru, represented yesterday and tomorrow with the rising sun between them. Although reversed, this composition reflected the symbolic use of paired animals flanking a cosmic principle.

In the New Kingdom and later periods, the motif persisted through sphinxes and guardian lions placed in symmetrical pairs at temple entrances or palace avenues—such as the ram-headed sphinxes lining the processional avenue in Thebes. Relief scenes frequently depicted goddesses in animal form or with animal heads shown symmetrically. The goddess Hathor, for example, often appeared doubled as two cows flanking the sun or the pharaoh, underscoring cosmic balance and divine guardianship.

Minoan and Mycenaean Greece

In the prehistoric Aegean, the motif of confronted animals held a special place, often linked with nature deities. In Minoan Crete (2nd millennium BCE), the figure of the Mistress of Animals (Potnia Theron) appears in frescoes and seals, flanked symmetrically by animals. A well-known example is the Snake Goddess (~1600 BCE), depicted with uplifted arms holding serpents on each side—clearly a variation of the motif. These snakes, sacred symbols, flank the goddess symmetrically and emphasize her dominion over nature and apotropaic power.

Seals and frescoes from Minoan palaces show pairs of ibexes, bulls, or lions flanking central elements like trees or altars. Gold jewelry, such as the famous Bee Pendant from Malia, represents two bees or insects symmetrically facing a central orb—a microcosmic variation of the same visual logic.

THE “SNAKE GODDESSES” AND OTHER MINIATURE OBJECTS FROM THE TEMPLE REPOSITORIES

The most important cult objects from the Knossos Temple Repositories are the figurines of the “Snake Goddess.” They are named after the snakes twining around the body and arms of the larger figure and the two snakes that the smaller figure holds in her upraised hands.

The snakes symbolize the chthonic character of the cult of the goddess, while the feline creature on the head of the smaller figure suggests her dominion over nature. The exposed and voluptuous garments, consisting of a long flounced skirt, tight-fitting bodice, and a close-fitting bodice that exposes the figure's breasts, symbolize the fertility of women, the goddess, and, by implication, nature itself.

The large rock-crystal rosette and stone cross are astral symbols. Knossos–Temple Repositories, 1650–1550 B.C.

Photo by Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

In Mycenaean Greece (~1600–1100 BCE), the motif reached monumental scale in the Lion Gate at Mycenae (~1250 BCE). The relief above the gate features two lionesses standing symmetrically on a pedestal, their forepaws resting on a central column. The column is interpreted as a symbolic representation of a deity or sacred space, perhaps a stand-in for the Mycenaean Great Goddess. Some scholars believe it represents the palace gate or a sacred grove, with the lionesses acting as protectors of the royal and sacred precinct.

Mycenaean seals and rings also frequently depict heroes or deities grasping animals by the neck in symmetrical positions, echoing the Master of Animals motif.

Etruscans and the Western Mediterranean

In the 1st millennium BCE, the Etruscans of Italy adopted many Orientalizing motifs through trade with Greece and the Near East, including the confronted animals motif. A characteristic example is the Tomb of the Leopards in Tarquinia (~5th century BCE), where two leopards appear above a symposium scene, facing each other symmetrically. Though decorative, the animals also served as guardians of the banquet in the afterlife.

Similar motifs appear in Etruscan metalwork and ceramics, where pairs of feline or other animal forms flank sacred trees or objects. These were likely apotropaic or indicative of prestige. The Romans, continuing these traditions, embraced symbolic dualities such as the Dioscuri (twin heroes) depicted symmetrically or the Capitoline Wolf suckling the twins—another expression of dual guardianship.

In Carthage, a Phoenician colony in North Africa, the motif survived in adapted forms, particularly in the depiction of sacred trees flanked by confronted animals, echoing Phoenician and Mesopotamian prototypes.

Overall, across the ancient Mediterranean—from the Near East and Egypt to the Aegean and Italy—the image of two symmetrical animals facing each other recurs with striking consistency. Whether lionesses at city gates, sphinxes at tombs, goats flanking sacred trees, or winged creatures on jewelry, the motif was employed to convey power, sanctity, and protection.

Confronted leopards protect a banquet in the afterlife where Etruscan couples dine and are served wine from the ewers held by servers before the seating - mural in a Tomb of the Leopards burial chamber - necropolis of Tarquinia - Lazio, Italy

Other World Civilizations

Sub-Saharan Africa

In sub-Saharan Africa, although confronted animal motifs are not as systematically represented as in the ancient Near East, we find important and meaningful instances. A particularly notable example comes from the Kingdom of Benin (present-day Nigeria). The Benin bronze plaques of the 16th–17th centuries CE, which once adorned the royal palace, include depictions of the Oba (king) holding two leopards—one in each hand—standing symmetrically on either side. The leopard, considered the "king of the forest," symbolized the Oba’s alter ego and conveyed royal power and dominion over nature. This scene is a clear African expression of the Master of Animals motif and reveals the symbolic use of confronted animals to represent sovereignty and supernatural control.

Asia (Beyond the Near East)

In the Indian subcontinent, seals from the Indus Valley Civilization (ca. 2500–1900 BCE) show horned deities flanked by various animals—elephants, tigers, rhinoceroses, and buffaloes—though not always in perfect symmetry. The most famous, the so-called “Pashupati” seal, shows a deity in yogic posture surrounded by animals, a precursor to the later Hindu concept of Shiva as Lord of Beasts.

In Chinese tradition, mythical creatures like the dragon and phoenix often appear in symmetrical pairs, especially in imperial contexts, symbolizing the emperor and empress, or cosmic duality. Jade amulets from the Han dynasty show these creatures in a face-to-face arrangement. In the Mawangdui tomb banner (2nd century BCE), a human deity with outstretched arms holds serpents or dragons at either side—another example of a central figure with flanking animals.

In Southeast Asia and Oceania, traditional art also expresses the principle of symmetry. In Papua New Guinea and Indonesian carving traditions, we find representations of birds, reptiles, or totemic creatures in balanced, symmetrical positions, often in ritual or architectural contexts. While not as systematic as in the Fertile Crescent, the appearance of symmetrical animal pairs reveals a universal aesthetic and symbolic impulse.

Pre-Columbian Americas

In the Americas, the motif appears with regional variations. In Mesoamerica, the Aztec calendar stone features two massive serpents facing each other at the base, symbolizing cosmic cycles. The twin heroes of Mayan mythology, though anthropomorphic, reflect duality and symmetry as sacred principles. Quetzalcoatl, the Feathered Serpent deity, is sometimes depicted between flanking animals, signifying his control over the natural world.

In the Andean region, Chavín art (1st millennium BCE) presents the Staff God holding two animal-headed staffs, surrounded by rows of symmetrical animal forms (eagles, serpents, felines). The Sun Gate at Tiwanaku shows a central deity—possibly Viracocha—holding staffs and flanked by confronting animal forms. These examples, found across the globe, demonstrate the motif’s transcultural resonance.

Lithograph of Powhatan's Mantle

E. T. Shelton (photograph, ca. 1888); P. W. M. Trap (lithography, ca. 1888)

Anthropological and Psychological Interpretations

The recurrence of the confronted animals motif in such diverse and geographically distant cultures invites a deeper anthropological and psychological analysis. Why has this motif appeared independently or been adopted so widely? What symbolic or functional needs does it fulfill?

1. Aesthetic Symmetry

One foundational explanation lies in the human attraction to symmetry. Bilateral symmetry is a fundamental feature of the natural world—from the human body to countless animals and plants. Thus, the human mind is predisposed to perceive symmetrical arrangements as orderly, harmonious, and pleasing. Two animals in mirrored confrontation form a closed, balanced composition. Psychologically, such balance symbolizes order over chaos—a central concern for early civilizations seeking to impose structure on a hostile or untamed environment. Independent of any specific religious or cultural meaning, the motif likely proliferated simply because it appealed to the human eye and psyche.

2. Symbolism of Power and Control

In many instances, particularly where a human or divine figure stands between the animals, the motif conveys power and dominion. Anthropologists have long observed that the Master of Animals scene often reflects elite or royal ideology. The hero or god subduing two beasts becomes a metaphor for the ruler who tames the wilderness, enforces order, or defends civilization. Examples range from Mesopotamian cylinder seals of the king battling lions to the Benin Oba gripping leopards. Even when the human figure is absent, the animals flanking a sacred symbol may imply guardian functions. Lions at Mycenaean gates or leopards in Etruscan tombs operate as sentinels at thresholds—between life and death, profane and sacred.

3. Duality and Cosmic Balance

Many cultures organize their cosmologies around dualities: light and dark, male and female, life and death, and earth and sky. Confronted animals often express these paired principles in visual form. In the Narmer Palette, the lionesses may represent Upper and Lower Egypt unified. In China, the dragon and phoenix reflect yin and yang. A tree flanked by goats might signify the union of terrestrial vitality with celestial ascent. Scholar Elvyra Usačiovaitė points out that a typical ancient archetype features two mirrored figures with a tree between them—sometimes kings or gods, or even deity and devotee—suggesting cosmic cooperation or harmonious balance.

Psychologically, the confrontation of equal animals suggests rivalry brought into balance. Neither overpowers the other; the symmetry embodies equilibrium, perhaps symbolizing the stable world order desired by ancient peoples. The motif may reflect a deep psychological need in humans to endure the weight of a world that surrounds and defines them before they even understand or choose it. People are born into a world already full of laws, symbols, natural forces, and social expectations—all of which exert pressure and seem overwhelming.

The symmetrical depiction of animals, especially when flanking a central figure, creates a sense of balanced order where one can safely stand and recognize themselves as an active being. Whether the central figure is a hero, a deity, or a symbolic human, its position between two facing beasts conveys the hope that chaos can be ordered and that the powers of nature can be controlled or coexist in harmony. The motif thus becomes a vessel for a timeless human desire: to believe that we are not at the mercy of the world, but that there is a center of meaning or strength that transcends and supports us.

4. Religious and Ritual Function

The motif is frequently found in religious or ceremonial contexts—on altars, temple gates, tombs, and sacred items—suggesting it served a spiritual purpose. Animals might embody guardian spirits, divine protectors, or totemic ancestors. Their symmetrical stance flanking a sacred object or space may act as an invocation, ward, or symbol of divine presence. The motif may have been used in initiation rites or cosmological teachings, conveying notions of balance, order, or divine oversight.

Though specific meanings varied across cultures, the form was adaptable—used to express fertility (animals flanking a Tree of Life), authority (a god or king between lions), or transcendence (sphinxes guarding sacred precincts).

5. Diffusion and Independent Invention

The global presence of the motif results from both cultural diffusion and independent development. Archaeological evidence supports diffusion: motifs traveling along trade routes from Mesopotamia to Anatolia, the Aegean, and eventually to Persia and China via textiles. Yet even in cultures without contact, the motif emerged independently—evidence of a shared human symbolic imagination. Across cultures, people sought to depict their mastery of nature, express duality, and sanctify space. The confronted animals motif met all these needs, both practically and spiritually.

In conclusion, no single interpretation exhausts the motif's meaning. It was polyvalent—sometimes ornamental, sometimes sacred, and sometimes royal. Its universality reflects shared human values: awe of the animal world, love of symmetry, and the need for symbols bridging the natural and the divine.

Later Continuity and Evolution of the Motif

The motif of confronted animals did not disappear with antiquity; instead, it was preserved and transformed across later periods, enduring into the 19th century. As religions, artistic traditions, and symbolic systems evolved, the motif adapted to new contexts while retaining its core principle—two entities in symmetrical confrontation.

Classical Antiquity and Early Christian Art

During the Greco-Roman period, the motif persisted, although less dominantly. In Greek art, the goddess Artemis as Potnia Theron was often shown with animals on either side—sometimes holding a stag in each hand—reiterating the visual theme of control over nature. Such imagery continued into Roman decorative contexts, where the idea of symmetrical flanking persisted in designs associated with deities, heroes, or cosmic concepts.

Medieval Europe

The motif found renewed vitality in medieval Europe, especially through contact with animal-style art from the steppe cultures. Germanic, Anglo-Saxon, and Viking art embraced symmetrical animal compositions, often highly stylized. One of the most famous examples is the Sutton Hoo purse lid (~7th century CE), which features three sets of confronted animals. On the outer panels, anthropomorphic figures grip wolves in symmetrical opposition; the central design includes a more abstract pair of confronted beasts in intricate interlace.

Purse-lid from the Sutton Hoo ship-burial 1, England. British Museum.

Rob Roy User:Robroyaus on en:wikipedia.org

Celtic and Insular art followed similar aesthetics. In illuminated manuscripts like the Book of Kells, human and animal figures appear in mirrored, often interwoven poses. The Viking art style known as "gripping beasts" continued this trend into the 11th century, showing confronted animals whose limbs or tails interlock in elaborate patterns.

Romanesque and Gothic Architecture

In Romanesque art (11th–12th centuries CE), the motif reappears in architectural sculpture. Church capitals and tympanums often show two dragons, lions, or other creatures facing each other, forming arches over windows and portals. These often had moral or apotropaic meanings, symbolizing the conflict between good and evil or acting as spiritual protectors.

Heraldry and Early Modern Symbolism

In medieval and early modern heraldry, the motif became codified in the form of "supporters"—animals flanking a coat of arms. Since the late Middle Ages, these have included lions, unicorns, eagles, and other creatures standing symmetrically on either side of a heraldic shield. The British royal arms, for instance, feature a lion and a unicorn as confronted supporters. Here, the ancient visual logic is maintained, with the animals no longer guarding a tree or deity but instead a symbol of state authority.

Romanesque capital, northern outside of the main apse of Basel Minster

HajjiBaba - Own work

Islamic and Renaissance Decorative Arts

In Islamic art, especially in textiles and carpets from the 13th to 15th centuries CE, the motif of two confronted animals surrounding a tree or medallion flourished. These “animal carpets” from Anatolia often showed mythical or real animals (dragons, phoenixes, deer, birds) in face-to-face symmetry within circular frames. The motif symbolized harmony, divine order, or heavenly gardens. These carpets were exported to Europe and depicted in Renaissance paintings as luxury objects.

In Renaissance Europe, the motif was often used decoratively. It appeared on tapestries, manuscript borders, and architectural friezes. The aesthetic value of symmetrical animal pairs outweighed their mythological significance, yet their symbolic resonance with antiquity remained strong.

Into the 18th and 19th Centuries

The motif continued into neoclassical and Romantic-era Europe, appearing in sculpture, architecture, and decorative design. Guardian lions flanking the entrances of neoclassical buildings, animal motifs on heraldic devices, and even national symbols like the double-headed eagle (a variation of the motif) sustained the ancient tradition.

Folk art, too, retained versions of the motif. European textiles, embroidery, and ceramics of the 18th–19th centuries often featured confronted horses, birds, or floral elements, reaffirming the enduring appeal of bilateral animal symmetry. Even when its origins were forgotten, the form continued to serve its functions: aesthetic harmony, symbolic balance, and cultural identity.

Animal carpet, Turkey, dated to the 11th–13th century, Museum of Islamic Art, Doha

The motif of confronted animals is one of the most enduring and universal in human artistic expression. From early Mesopotamian seals and Egyptian palettes to medieval manuscripts and 19th-century folk textiles, the image of two animals facing each other across a central axis has communicated a wealth of meanings.

Its persistence across millennia and continents suggests that it satisfies deep cognitive and symbolic needs. Whether representing divine guardianship, cosmic order, royal power, or pure visual balance, the motif was infinitely adaptable. Each culture integrated it into its own visual and symbolic vocabulary, and each time it was slightly reinvented—yet always recognizable.

At its heart, the motif reminds us that the human imagination is both universal and diverse. Across time and space, people have seen in the mirrored gaze of two animals not just an image, but a symbol of unity, guardianship, power, and equilibrium. It is a visual language that continues to echo in our collective memory.

Thessaloniki’s New Revolutionary Metro-Museum: A Global First and Europe’s Most Advanced

Ancient Marvels Meet Modern Innovation in Thessaloniki’s One-of-a-Kind Metro-Museum

Thessaloniki, a city with over 2,300 years of continuous history, has just unveiled a groundbreaking metro system that is not merely a means of transportation but a journey through the layers of its storied past. Hailed as the most modern metro system in Europe and the first of its kind in the world to integrate an archaeological museum, the Thessaloniki Metro is a shining example of innovation and preservation working hand in hand.

A Metro Unlike Any Other

The Thessaloniki Metro isn’t just about cutting-edge trains and improved urban mobility; it is a window into history, with every station offering a glimpse of the city’s ancient and Byzantine heritage. During its construction, which began in 2006, excavations unearthed thousands of archaeological treasures, transforming the project into the largest archaeological dig in northern Greece.

The finds include a headless statue of Aphrodite, intricate mosaics, golden wreaths, Roman-era plumbing systems, and over 300,000 other artifacts. The crown jewel is undoubtedly the preservation of the city's Decumanus Maximus—the main thoroughfare of Roman Thessaloniki—which lies beneath the bustling Egnatia Street. This ancient road, lined with marble columns and featuring a Byzantine marketplace, is now displayed in situ at Venizelou Station, offering commuters a direct connection to the city’s past.

Venizelou Station: The World’s First Open Metro Museum

The centerpiece of the metro is Venizelou Station, a marvel of engineering and archaeological preservation. This station allows visitors to experience an open museum underground, featuring a Byzantine road complete with shops, workshops, and other urban elements preserved exactly as they were unearthed. The station’s design ensures that passengers and visitors alike can admire these ancient treasures in their original context, creating a seamless blend of ancient and modern.

Unlike other metro systems worldwide, Thessaloniki’s approach goes beyond displaying artifacts in glass cases. Here, history surrounds you—beneath your feet, beside you as you walk to the platforms, and even on the walls that frame the station.

A City Shaped by History

Thessaloniki’s unique identity has always been shaped by its geography and history. Founded in 315 BCE by King Cassander of Macedonia, the city has been a melting pot of cultures and civilizations. It thrived as a vital hub in the Roman Empire, became a bastion of Byzantine culture, and endured centuries of Ottoman rule. Its location on the Via Egnatia, a major trade and military route connecting Rome to Constantinople, cemented its role as a bridge between East and West.

This complex history is embedded in the layers of soil beneath the city. Every step of the metro’s construction was a delicate dance between modern engineering and the safeguarding of these historical treasures, a process that demanded patience, ingenuity, and collaboration between archaeologists and engineers.

Challenges and Triumphs

The project was not without controversy and challenges. Initial plans called for some artifacts to be relocated, sparking public outcry and a legal battle that reached Greece’s highest court. Ultimately, a solution was found: the metro’s design was reconfigured to preserve and display the discoveries in situ. This decision not only delayed the project but also significantly increased its budget, with archaeological work alone costing over €132 million.

Despite these hurdles, the end result is a triumph. Thessaloniki’s metro now stands as a global model for how infrastructure projects can respect and enhance cultural heritage rather than erase it.

A Journey Through Time

For residents and visitors alike, traveling on the Thessaloniki Metro is more than a commute—it is an immersive experience. From the marble-paved roads of Roman times to Byzantine crossroads and Ottoman-era artifacts, each station tells a part of the city’s story. The metro serves as both a practical urban solution and a cultural treasure trove, ensuring that Thessaloniki’s rich history is preserved for generations to come.

A Vision for the Future

As Thessaloniki steps into the future with one of the most advanced metro systems in Europe, it does so with a profound respect for its past. The city has shown the world that progress and preservation can coexist, creating a legacy that honors its ancient roots while embracing modernity. The Thessaloniki Metro isn’t just a transportation network—it’s a celebration of a city where history is never forgotten, even as it surges forward into the 21st century.

Best Mosaic Masterpieces of the Ancient World: 10 Best-Preserved Wonders

Mosaics, with their intricate designs and vibrant colors, have long fascinated historians, archaeologists, and art enthusiasts alike. These ancient works of art, composed of tiny pieces of stone, glass, or ceramics (known as tesserae), have survived the test of time, offering a window into the past. Across different civilizations, mosaics served as a form of storytelling, cultural expression, and architectural decoration. Here, we explore ten of the most breathtaking and well-preserved mosaics from antiquity, each revealing unique aspects of ancient life and artistry.

1. The Alexander Mosaic – Pompeii, Italy

Perhaps the most iconic mosaic of antiquity, the Alexander Mosaic, dates back to the 2nd century BCE. Discovered in the ruins of Pompeii’s House of the Faun, this masterpiece depicts the Battle of Issus between Alexander the Great and the Persian king Darius III. The mosaic showcases exceptional craftsmanship, with over 1.5 million tesserae capturing the intensity and movement of battle. The use of shading and perspective highlights the advanced techniques of Hellenistic artists. Today, the original is preserved in the Naples National Archaeological Museum, while a replica remains at its original site.

2. The Villa Romana del Casale Mosaics – Sicily, Italy

The mosaics of the Villa Romana del Casale, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, are among the finest examples of Roman mosaic art, dating to the 4th century CE. This luxurious villa in Sicily features over 3,500 square meters of mosaics, illustrating scenes of hunting, mythological figures, and daily life. The "Great Hunt" mosaic, in particular, offers a vivid portrayal of exotic animal captures, reflecting the Roman fascination with the natural world and their expansive empire. The stunning preservation of these mosaics provides a rare glimpse into the opulent lifestyle of the Roman elite.

3. The Hellenistic Mosaics of Pella – Greece

Pella, the ancient capital of Macedon and the birthplace of Alexander the Great, boasts some of the earliest known examples of complex floor mosaics. Dating to the 4th century BCE, these mosaics feature intricate scenes of mythological hunts, animals, and geometric patterns. The famous "Lion Hunt" mosaic, made with pebbles rather than cut stone, exemplifies the skill of early Hellenistic artists. The use of shading and dynamic compositions showcases the innovation in Greek mosaic art during this period.

4. The Mosaics of the Basilica of San Vitale – Ravenna, Italy

Dating to the 6th century CE, the mosaics of the Basilica of San Vitale in Ravenna are renowned for their vibrant colors and religious iconography. These mosaics are some of the finest examples of Byzantine art, illustrating scenes from the Old and New Testaments, as well as portraits of Emperor Justinian and Empress Theodora. The combination of gold tesserae, intricate patterns, and detailed facial expressions reflects the spiritual and political power of the Byzantine Empire. The Basilica itself is a UNESCO World Heritage Site, drawing visitors from around the world.

5. The House of Dionysus Mosaics – Paphos, Cyprus

The House of Dionysus, located in the ancient city of Paphos (a UNESCO World Heritage Site), features one of the most extensive collections of mosaics from the Roman period. Dating to the 2nd century CE, these mosaics are notable for their vivid depictions of Greek mythology, including scenes of Dionysian feasts, the Labors of Hercules, and the tale of Phaedra and Hippolytus. The use of vibrant colors and the detailed portrayal of figures highlight the artistic achievements of Roman craftsmen in Cyprus.

6. The Lod Mosaic – Israel

Unearthed in 1996, the Lod Mosaic is one of the best-preserved mosaics from the Roman Empire, dating to around the 3rd century CE. This elaborate floor mosaic, found near Tel Aviv, features a series of panels with stunning depictions of marine life, animals, and geometric designs. The central panel, showcasing a wide variety of fish and sea creatures, is particularly notable for its lifelike detail. The mosaic's excellent preservation offers insight into the artistic traditions of the eastern Roman provinces.

7. The Great Palace Mosaics – Istanbul, Turkey

The mosaics from the Great Palace of Constantinople, dating to the 6th century CE, provide a glimpse into the daily life and ceremonial splendor of the Byzantine Empire. These mosaics, now housed in the Great Palace Mosaic Museum, depict scenes of hunting, chariot racing, and various mythical creatures. The intricate designs and use of vibrant colors reflect the luxurious tastes of the Byzantine elite. The mosaics also serve as valuable historical records, illustrating a wide range of activities and cultural elements from the early medieval period.

8. The Antioch Mosaics – Hatay, Turkey

The ancient city of Antioch (modern-day Antakya) was a major center of Roman and early Christian art. The Antioch Mosaics, dating from the 2nd to 5th centuries CE, are known for their intricate geometric designs and mythological themes. One of the most famous pieces, the "Drunken Dionysus" mosaic, captures the god of wine in a relaxed, almost whimsical state. These mosaics are now displayed in the Hatay Archaeology Museum, showcasing the artistic fusion of Greco-Roman and Eastern influences in the region.

9. The Mosaics of Zeugma – Gaziantep, Turkey

Zeugma, once a thriving city on the banks of the Euphrates, is home to some of the most exquisite mosaics of the ancient world. Discovered in the early 2000s during rescue excavations, the Zeugma mosaics date from the 2nd to 3rd centuries CE. Notable pieces include the "Gypsy Girl" mosaic, renowned for its enigmatic gaze, and the "Oceanus and Tethys" mosaic, showcasing intricate marine scenes. The delicate detailing and lifelike portrayal of human expressions highlight the exceptional skill of Zeugma’s artists.

10. The Floor Mosaic of the House of the Birds – Italica, Spain

The ancient Roman city of Italica, near Seville, boasts one of the finest floor mosaics from the Roman period, dating to the 2nd century CE. The "House of the Birds" mosaic features a central panel depicting various bird species, surrounded by intricate geometric patterns. The exceptional preservation of the mosaic offers a glimpse into the decorative tastes of Roman domestic architecture. Italica, the birthplace of emperors Trajan and Hadrian, remains a significant archaeological site, and its mosaics are a testament to the city’s historical and cultural legacy.

Conclusion

These ten mosaics are more than mere decorations; they are historical documents, capturing the cultural values, artistic innovations, and everyday life of ancient civilizations. Their exceptional preservation allows us to appreciate the craftsmanship and storytelling of ancient artisans, whose works continue to inspire awe and admiration thousands of years later. As we uncover and restore more of these treasures, each mosaic tells a new chapter in the vivid tapestry of our shared human history.

Discovery of a Bronze Battering Ram from the Depths of the Mediterranean

In August 2024, the waters off the coast of Sicily gave up a remarkable treasure—a bronze battering ram from an ancient Roman warship, untouched since it sank to the seabed in 241 BC. Resting at a depth of 260 feet, this exceptional artifact was retrieved by modern-day explorers utilizing cutting-edge deep-sea submarines, once again reminding us of the enduring mysteries held by the Mediterranean. Its recovery is more than just a salvage operation; it is a window into a defining moment in ancient naval warfare and Roman history.

An Icon of Ancient Naval Warfare

This battering ram, or "rostrum", was far from a decorative piece. Cast in bronze and adorned with intricate reliefs depicting a Montefortino-style helmet—a hallmark of Roman military identity—the ram symbolizes the synthesis of artistic skill and lethal functionality. The Montefortino helmet, widely used by Roman soldiers in the Republican era, serves as a powerful emblem, embodying the Roman martial spirit that dominated the Mediterranean seas.

These rams were engineered to be devastating weapons of war, mounted on the prow of a ship with a singular purpose: to smash into the hulls of enemy vessels, shattering wooden beams and sending ships to their watery graves. The use of rams in naval combat was a tactical innovation that exemplified the brutal, direct style of Roman warfare. By combining the principles of momentum and strength, the Roman fleet could deliver deadly blows, turning the tide of battle through sheer force.

Relics of the Battle of the Aegates

The recovered ram is a tangible link to one of the most decisive naval engagements of the ancient world—the Battle of the Aegates in 241 BC. This climactic confrontation marked the end of the First Punic War, a protracted and bitter conflict between Rome and Carthage that spanned over two decades. It was in these waters near the Aegadian Islands that the Roman fleet, leveraging their newly constructed ships and superior tactics, delivered a crushing defeat to the Carthaginians.

The ancient historian Polybius vividly described the scene of devastation: 50 Carthaginian ships destroyed, 70 more captured, and a staggering 10,000 sailors taken prisoner. The victory was not just a military success but a strategic masterstroke that broke the naval power of Carthage and established Rome as the uncontested ruler of the Mediterranean. It was a turning point, heralding the rise of Roman naval supremacy that would shape the course of Western history.

A Submerged Battlefield: The Underwater Archaeological Site

The seabed off Sicily is more than just a resting place for shipwrecks; it is an entire submerged battlefield, frozen in time. Alongside the recently recovered ram, a staggering collection of relics has been unearthed—25 rams in total, as well as helmets, swords, and amphorae. These findings paint a vivid picture of the intensity and scale of ancient naval warfare, offering a rare glimpse into the armaments and tactics used by both Roman and Carthaginian forces.

Each artifact is a fragment of a larger narrative, contributing to our understanding of the technologies and strategies employed in this brutal confrontation. The helmets and swords suggest the presence of heavily armed marines, while the amphorae, used for storing provisions, speak to the logistical efforts required to sustain a fleet engaged in prolonged warfare. It is a scene that brings to life the accounts of ancient historians, transforming their words into tangible evidence.

The Legacy of Sebastiano Tusa

This extraordinary discovery is a testament to the pioneering work of the late Sebastiano Tusa, a visionary archaeologist and the driving force behind the ongoing exploration of this underwater site. Tusa’s efforts have uncovered a treasure trove of ancient relics, turning the waters off Sicily into one of the most significant archaeological sites beneath the sea. His dedication and expertise have ensured that the study of these artifacts will continue for decades, offering new insights into the maritime history of the ancient Mediterranean.

Tusa’s legacy is not only in the objects recovered but in the stories they tell—a testament to the enduring fascination of ancient history and the relentless pursuit of knowledge. His vision has left an indelible mark on the field of underwater archaeology, inspiring a new generation of researchers to continue exploring the depths for the secrets of the past.

Diving Into History

The retrieval of the bronze battering ram is a monumental achievement, a reminder of the dynamic power struggles that shaped the ancient world. It is a story of innovation, conflict, and triumph—a narrative that comes alive as we uncover the tools and weapons used by ancient warriors.

As we delve deeper into the submerged ruins of naval history, each find is a piece of the puzzle that helps reconstruct the epic battles waged for control of the Mediterranean. The discovery off the coast of Sicily is not just an archaeological triumph; it is a journey back in time to an era when Rome’s destiny was forged in the crucible of war.

The exploration of this underwater battlefield is far from over. With every new artifact brought to light, we gain a richer understanding of the complex interplay between technology, strategy, and power that defined ancient naval warfare. And in this dance of discovery, the waves continue to whisper the stories of long-forgotten sailors, echoing the clash of steel and the roar of triumph that once filled these waters.

In the end, that is the true power of archaeology: to bring the past to the surface and make history come alive, one remarkable find at a time.

Unveiling the Magnificence of Roman Mosaics in Salakta: The Lion of the 3rd Century CE

The coastal town of Salakta in Tunisia, once part of the prosperous Roman province of Africa Proconsularis, is home to a remarkable artifact of ancient craftsmanship — a large and intricately designed Roman mosaic depicting a lion, dating back to the 3rd century CE. Now displayed in the Salakta Archaeological Museum, this mosaic not only showcases the artistic excellence of the Roman era but also offers us a glimpse into the cultural and economic significance of the region during antiquity. This article delves into the historical context, the artistry of the mosaic, and its broader implications for our understanding of Roman North Africa.

Salakta: A Forgotten Gem of Roman Africa

Salakta, known in ancient times as Sullectum, was a thriving port city on the Mediterranean coast of what is now Tunisia. During the height of the Roman Empire, Sullectum played a pivotal role in the economic network of the region, facilitating trade across the Mediterranean. It was part of the fertile land known as the Byzacena region, famed for its agricultural output, including grains, olives, and wine, which were exported to feed the ever-growing cities of the Roman Empire.

The prosperity of Sullectum during the Roman period is evident in the wealth of archaeological remains discovered in the area, including temples, villas, and, most notably, mosaics. These mosaics reflect the affluent lifestyle and artistic tastes of the local elite, who commissioned elaborate decorative artworks for their private and public spaces.

The Lion Mosaic: A Symbol of Power and Prestige

The lion mosaic, now preserved at the Salakta Archaeological Museum, is a striking representation of Roman mosaic art from the 3rd century CE. Measuring several meters in length, the mosaic features a life-sized depiction of a lion in a dynamic, almost regal pose. The lion, an apex predator and a potent symbol of strength, was a common motif in Roman iconography, representing power, dominance, and the ferocity of nature. It is likely that the mosaic was commissioned for a wealthy villa or a public building, intended to convey the might and status of its owner.

The artwork's composition is sophisticated, employing a variety of colored tesserae — small pieces of stone, glass, and ceramics — to achieve a realistic and vibrant image. The lion's mane is rendered in shades of gold and brown, creating a sense of movement and texture, while its body is depicted with a muscular, lifelike quality. The mosaic's background features intricate geometric patterns, a hallmark of Roman decorative art, providing a striking contrast to the naturalism of the animal figure.

The Artistic Techniques of Roman Mosaics

Roman mosaics were a popular form of decoration in the ancient world, adorning floors, walls, and ceilings of both private and public spaces. The creation of a mosaic was a meticulous process that required the skills of highly trained artisans, known as mosaicists. The process typically began with the preparation of the surface, followed by the careful placement of tesserae into a wet mortar. The tesserae were often sourced from local quarries, and the choice of materials — from marble and limestone to colored glass — added vibrancy and depth to the finished piece.

In the case of the lion mosaic, the use of diverse colors and the attention to anatomical detail suggest that it was crafted by skilled artisans, possibly influenced by the artistic trends of the wider Mediterranean region. The style is indicative of the Roman pavimenta sectilia, a form of mosaic art that emphasized intricate designs and realistic depictions of animals, mythological scenes, and daily life.

The Cultural and Symbolic Significance

The depiction of a lion in the mosaic is not merely an artistic choice but is laden with cultural symbolism. In Roman mythology and culture, lions were often associated with deities such as Hercules and Bacchus, embodying themes of heroism, protection, and divine power. The presence of a lion in the artwork could be interpreted as a protective emblem, symbolizing the strength and resilience of the household or the community it adorned.

Moreover, the choice of a lion as the central motif reflects the interconnected cultural influences of the Roman Empire. While the lion was a familiar symbol in Roman art, its depiction may also draw from the local Berber traditions of North Africa, where lions were native and held a significant place in regional mythology and folklore.

Preservation and Display at the Salakta Archaeological Museum

The Salakta Archaeological Museum, where the mosaic is currently housed, offers a fascinating journey through the ancient history of the region. The museum's collection includes a variety of artifacts from the Roman period, such as pottery, inscriptions, and other mosaics, providing a comprehensive view of life in ancient Sullectum. The lion mosaic is undoubtedly one of the highlights of the museum, drawing visitors and scholars alike who are captivated by its artistic beauty and historical significance.

The mosaic has been carefully preserved, allowing us to appreciate the craftsmanship of the Roman artisans after nearly two millennia. However, the preservation process has not been without its challenges. The coastal environment of Salakta, with its high humidity and salt air, poses ongoing threats to the integrity of such ancient artworks. Conservation efforts have focused on stabilizing the tesserae and preventing further deterioration, ensuring that the mosaic can continue to be enjoyed by future generations.

Conclusion: A Testament to Roman Artistic Legacy

The lion mosaic of Salakta stands as a testament to the artistic and cultural legacy of the Roman Empire in North Africa. It encapsulates the richness of Roman art, the skills of ancient craftsmen, and the cultural synthesis that characterized the Mediterranean world during antiquity. More than just a decorative piece, the mosaic is a window into the past, offering insights into the values, aesthetics, and daily life of the people who once inhabited this vibrant coastal city.

As we admire the lion mosaic today, we are reminded of the enduring power of art to connect us with history, transcending the centuries and allowing us to glimpse a fragment of the world as it once was — a world where the roar of the lion echoed not only in the wild but also in the halls of the Roman elite. The Salakta Archaeological Museum preserves this connection, inviting us to explore and celebrate the shared heritage of humanity.

Unearthing the Lost Tunnels of Puebla: A Journey Through Mexico’s Hidden History

In 2015, a myth that had whispered through the streets of Puebla, Mexico, for centuries was finally proven true. Beneath this historic city lay a vast underground network of tunnels, stretching up to 10 kilometers, dating back as far as 500 years. What was once thought to be mere folklore has now become one of the most significant archaeological discoveries in the region, shedding new light on Puebla's vibrant history and its role in pivotal moments of Mexico’s past.

A Long-Buried Secret: The Discovery

The discovery of the tunnels was almost accidental. During routine construction work in the city, laborers stumbled upon a hidden passage. This unexpected find set off a wave of excitement among archaeologists and historians, eager to uncover the truth behind the legends of Puebla’s subterranean pathways. The tunnels, which had been shrouded in mystery and dismissed as myth, were found to be remarkably well-preserved, despite centuries of abandonment and the passage of time.

These tunnels, large enough to accommodate horseback riders, form a complex labyrinth stretching from Puebla's historic center to the iconic Loreto Fort. Their size and construction suggest they were built with strategic purposes in mind, likely serving as covert routes for soldiers and civilians during times of conflict.

Strategic Roles in Mexico’s Wars

The rediscovered tunnels hold a significant place in Mexican history, offering new insights into the nation’s turbulent past. Historians believe the network was likely utilized during key historical events, including the Mexican War of Independence (1810–1821) and the 19th-century conflict with France, known as the Battle of Puebla, which took place on May 5, 1862—an event commemorated as Cinco de Mayo.

During these conflicts, the tunnels would have provided a secret means of transportation, communication, and the movement of troops and supplies. The passage connecting to Loreto Fort is particularly telling, as this site was crucial in the famous battle where Mexican forces, led by General Ignacio Zaragoza, defeated the better-equipped French army, bolstering national morale and becoming a symbol of Mexican resistance.

Artifacts Frozen in Time: Discoveries Beneath the Mud

The mud that filled these tunnels acted as a natural preservative, shielding a fascinating array of artifacts from the ravages of time. Archaeologists have uncovered an assortment of items, ranging from everyday objects to remnants of military history. Toys, kitchen utensils, pottery, and various domestic items provide a glimpse into the daily lives of the people who once used these tunnels. More notably, weapons and ammunition from the 1800s have been found, suggesting the tunnels' role in military activities.

These discoveries offer invaluable insights into the social and cultural fabric of Puebla during its formative years. The presence of children's toys, for instance, hints at the possibility that families sought refuge in the tunnels during times of unrest. Meanwhile, the kitchenware and pottery indicate that these underground passages may have been used as temporary homes or safe havens.

A New Chapter: Opening the Tunnels to the Public

In 2017, two years after the initial rediscovery, the tunnels were opened to the public, allowing visitors to experience a hidden slice of history firsthand. Today, guided tours take visitors along a carefully restored section of the network, offering a unique journey beneath the bustling streets of modern-day Puebla. The tour also includes a visit to a dedicated museum, where many of the artifacts found in the tunnels are on display, helping to contextualize the rich history of the area.

The opening of the tunnels has sparked renewed interest in Puebla’s past, attracting both local and international tourists eager to explore this underground world. Walking through these dimly lit passages, with their arched ceilings and stone walls, visitors are transported back in time, imagining the footsteps of soldiers, families, and revolutionaries who once relied on these hidden paths.

The Rediscovered Legacy of Puebla’s Underground Network

The uncovering of Puebla’s tunnels has done more than simply reveal a long-forgotten architectural feat; it has reignited a connection to the city’s past, breathing new life into stories of resilience, strategy, and survival. This remarkable find stands as a testament to the ingenuity and resourcefulness of those who built and utilized these passages during some of Mexico’s most defining historical moments.

As the excavation and preservation efforts continue, who knows what more might be uncovered beneath Puebla’s streets? The rediscovery of these tunnels serves as a reminder of the rich, layered history that often lies hidden beneath our feet, waiting to be unearthed and shared with the world. For now, the tunnels of Puebla offer a rare opportunity to walk in the shadows of history, connecting us directly to the people and events that shaped Mexico’s journey to independence and identity.

Whether you are a history enthusiast, an archaeology lover, or simply a curious traveler, the tunnels of Puebla invite you to delve deeper into the heart of Mexico’s past—quite literally.

The Timeless Elegance of Etruscan Art: The Sarcophagus of Seianti Hanunia Tlesnasa

The sarcophagus of Seianti Hanunia Tlesnasa, discovered at Poggio Cantarello in Tuscany and dating to 150-140 BC, stands as a testament to the intricate artistry and cultural richness of Etruscan society. This brightly painted terracotta masterpiece is housed in the British Museum, where it continues to captivate scholars and visitors alike with its elaborate detail and symbolism.

Seianti Hanunia Tlesnasa, whose name is inscribed in Etruscan script at the base of the chest, belonged to one of the wealthiest families of Chiusi, an important Etruscan city. The sarcophagus reflects not only her elite status but also the intricate craftsmanship characteristic of Etruscan funerary art. Etruscan society placed great emphasis on the afterlife, with a particular focus on ensuring the deceased were remembered and honored. This sarcophagus embodies these beliefs through its lifelike representation of the deceased and the elaborate adornments that accompany her.

The sculptural representation of Seianti portrays her reclining gracefully on a shallow mattress, propped up by a plump pillow, a position that echoes the scenes of banqueting and leisure commonly depicted in Etruscan art. This pose reflects not only comfort but a form of eternal repose, suggesting that the afterlife was seen as a continuation of the pleasures of life. She holds an open-lidded mirror, an attribute symbolizing femininity and possibly self-awareness or introspection, while her right hand is raised to adjust her cloak, imbuing the figure with a sense of natural movement and grace.

The attire of Seianti further emphasizes her high status. She wears an ornate gown and cloak, intricately draped to fall in fluid, sinuous folds over her form. Such drapery, expertly rendered in terracotta, showcases the skill of Etruscan artisans in achieving a lifelike and dynamic representation of textiles. The figure is also adorned with a tiara, earrings, bracelets, and a necklace, each detail underscoring the wealth and fashion of the Etruscan elite.

Inside the sarcophagus, the skeletal remains confirmed the identity of the deceased as a woman aged approximately 50-55 years. This age suggests that Seianti lived a full life, a noteworthy detail in an era when life expectancy was often shorter. The discovery of this sarcophagus provides not only an artistic triumph but also an intimate look into the societal roles and status of Etruscan women.

Etruscan art, as exemplified by Seianti’s sarcophagus, had profound influences that extended well beyond their own civilization. The Etruscans were known for their unique synthesis of Greek and Italic artistic traditions, blending them into a distinctive style that highlighted both their technical skill and their cultural values. Elements such as the reclining pose and the use of terracotta would later inspire Roman funerary practices. The Romans, who inherited much from Etruscan culture following their assimilation, adopted and adapted these artistic conventions, perpetuating the legacy of Etruscan art within their own monuments and sepulchral traditions.

---

Etruscans: Italian Civilization Before Ancient Rome

---

The sarcophagus of Seianti Hanunia Tlesnasa is thus more than an exquisite work of art; it is a narrative piece that tells the story of Etruscan social structures, religious beliefs, and artistic achievements. Its enduring presence in the British Museum continues to offer valuable insights into the sophisticated society that once thrived in pre-Roman Italy. Through the life and image of Seianti, modern viewers are invited to glimpse the rich interplay of identity, art, and cultural continuity that defined the Etruscan world.

The Chariot of Monteleone: A Testament to Etruscan Artistry and Cultural Connectivity

The Chariot of Monteleone, an exquisite artifact dating back to approximately 530 BC, stands as a brilliant testament to the advanced craftsmanship and cultural sophistication of the Etruscan civilization. Unearthed in 1902 near Monteleone di Spoleto in Umbria, Italy, this ceremonial chariot is not only a masterpiece of ancient metalwork but also an important symbol of the Etruscans' interaction with neighboring cultures, particularly the Greeks.

The Masterpiece in Detail

The chariot’s most captivating feature is its front panel, adorned with a meticulously crafted depiction of Achilles, the legendary Greek hero. This scene, dynamic and filled with tension, illustrates Achilles in his characteristic heroic poise, clad in detailed armor that showcases intricate artistic techniques. The depiction is not merely decorative; it serves as a narrative tableau that reveals the Etruscans' deep familiarity with Greek mythology and their appreciation for epic themes. This level of detail highlights the technical prowess of Etruscan artisans who seamlessly combined repoussé and engraving techniques to create lifelike scenes that resonate with mythological significance.

Etruscan Art and Influence

The craftsmanship evident in the Chariot of Monteleone is emblematic of the broader artistic excellence of the Etruscans. Renowned for their skill in bronze work, ceramics, and goldsmithing, Etruscan artisans were highly regarded across the Mediterranean. This chariot, with its elaborate panels and harmonious design, exemplifies how Etruscan art was both unique and influenced by other cultures, particularly the Greeks. Greek influence permeated Etruscan art through trade and interaction, resulting in a cultural symbiosis that enriched Etruscan aesthetic expressions.

A Civilization Shaped by Exchange

The Etruscans, who flourished in central Italy between the 8th and 3rd centuries BC, were a highly sophisticated society known for their rich religious traditions, urban planning, and dynamic trade networks. Their cities, such as Tarquinia, Cerveteri, and Vulci, were hubs of cultural and economic activity, facilitating the flow of ideas and goods throughout the Mediterranean.

The Chariot of Monteleone exemplifies the Etruscans' propensity for adopting and adapting external influences. Greek pottery, motifs, and mythological narratives were readily integrated into Etruscan art, showcasing their open-minded approach to cultural synthesis. This was not a one-sided relationship; Etruscan art and religious practices, in turn, left their mark on early Roman culture, shaping the nascent identity of what would become one of history's most influential civilizations.

Legacy and Modern Appreciation

Today, the Chariot of Monteleone is housed in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, where it continues to captivate scholars and visitors alike. It serves as a window into the world of the Etruscans, illustrating their technical expertise, artistic vision, and the complexity of their cultural engagements. The artifact is more than just an object of beauty; it is a testament to the interconnectedness of ancient civilizations and the enduring legacy of Etruscan craftsmanship.

---

The Enigmatic Language of the Etruscans: Non-Indo-European?

---

In studying the Chariot of Monteleone, we gain a deeper understanding of how the Etruscans skillfully balanced their unique identity with the influences of neighboring cultures. This artifact, with its vivid depiction of Achilles and the echoes of Greek mythology, remains a powerful symbol of a civilization that thrived on artistry, innovation, and exchange.

The Forma Urbis Romae: The Story of Lost Severan Monumental Marble Map of Rome

---

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

---

A City Carved in Stone: Decoding Ancient Cartography Through Rome’s Severan Marble Map and: a Testament to Rome’s Glory"

The Forma Urbis Romae, commonly known as the Severan Marble Plan, stands as one of the most remarkable archaeological artifacts from ancient Rome. Commissioned between 203 and 211 CE under the reign of Emperor Septimius Severus, this monumental marble map not only documents the urban layout of the city with immense detail but also captures the grandeur of Rome at its peak. Despite its fragmented survival, the Forma Urbis Romae remains a focal point for scholars and historians, offering a glimpse into the empire’s architectural prowess, urban planning, and historical record-keeping. Through this detailed analysis, we will explore what the Forma Urbis Romae reveals about ancient Rome, the mysteries of its purpose, its journey through history, and its significance today.

The Structure and Design of the Forma Urbis Romae

Originally measuring an astounding 18 meters wide by 13 meters high, the Forma Urbis Romae was carved into 150 marble slabs and mounted on an interior wall of the Temple of Peace, also known as the Templum Pacis. The map was crafted from Proconnesian marble and covered a significant area on the temple’s wall, capturing a detailed ground plan of the imperial city at an approximate scale of 1:240. The creators of the map oriented it with the south at the top, an orientation differing from the north-oriented convention typical in modern maps.

The map was extraordinarily detailed, reflecting the ground plans of Rome’s public and private spaces, including temples, baths, and housing blocks (insulae), along with streets and other communal structures. Even interior details, like colonnades, staircases, and doorways, were incised, with certain features highlighted through symbolic signs or dotted lines. The Forma Urbis Romae revealed the precise architectural layout of each building, and despite some inaccuracies in the carving, the map’s details were an exceptional testament to Roman urban sophistication.

What Does the Forma Urbis Romae Tell Us About Ancient Rome?

The Forma Urbis Romae primarily provides insight into Rome’s architecture and urban organization during the Severan period. By showcasing individual buildings and their internal structures, the map hints at the Romans’ meticulous attention to spatial design and their emphasis on monumental architecture. Notably, prominent public buildings like the Colosseum and the Circus Maximus are clearly depicted, underscoring the role of such spaces in Roman culture.

Moreover, the map highlights the Severan dynasty’s architectural legacy. Archaeologist Susann Lusnia suggests that the Forma Urbis served as a symbolic record of Severus’ building program, which included both restoration projects and new constructions aimed at solidifying his dynasty’s standing. The map’s scale and intricacy might suggest it was intended more as a decorative display than as a functional map. However, its basis in actual land surveys reflects the Romans’ advanced mapping techniques and desire for spatial accuracy in monumental depictions of their empire’s capital.

Purpose and Function of the Forma Urbis Romae

Scholars remain divided on the primary function of the Forma Urbis Romae. Some propose that it served as an official cadastral or locator map within the Temple of Peace, which might have functioned as an archive for the city’s records. However, David Reynolds, a scholar in Roman cartography, argues that the map was likely a decorative showpiece rather than a practical tool. Given its immense size, the map would have been challenging to consult in detail from the floor, especially as many sections were left unlabeled, further questioning its practicality.

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

View fullsize

Reynolds suggests that there may have been two versions of the Forma Urbis: one functional, preserved in papyrus form with landownership annotations and other precise details, and the marble version intended for public display. This decorative version would visually demonstrate Rome’s urban landscape while drawing attention to Severus’ accomplishments. By placing it in the Temple of Peace, Severus could project his influence over the city’s physical and symbolic landscape.

The Journey of the Forma Urbis Through the Centuries

Following its creation, the Forma Urbis Romae gradually succumbed to the ravages of time. By the early 5th century, the map suffered significant damage when a passageway was cut through the wall it adorned. The marble slabs were eventually abandoned, with many removed or repurposed for lime production during the late medieval period.

Giovanni Battista Piranesi, Map of ancient Rome and Forma Urbis, from Le antichità Romane, 1835-1839.

Rediscovery of the Forma Urbis fragments began in 1562 when antiquarian sculptor Giovanni Antonio Dosio excavated pieces near the Church of SS. Cosma e Damiano. Over the centuries, further fragments were unearthed, with key pieces identified and matched to notable structures like the Forum of Augustus and the Baths of Agrippa. Despite these efforts, only about 10-15% of the original marble map survives, though this has been sufficient to spark ongoing scholarly fascination and reconstruction projects.

The Forma Urbis Today: A Testament to Roman Legacy

In 2024, the fragments of the Forma Urbis Romae finally received a dedicated exhibition space at the newly opened Museo della Forma Urbis near the Colosseum. This museum, part of the larger Archaeological Park of the Celio, allows visitors to walk over the map fragments displayed under glass flooring, experiencing a physical connection to ancient Rome’s monumental design. The museum also features an 18th-century copy of a historical map, the Nolli Map, superimposed on the ancient fragments, helping visitors contextualize the ancient city layout.

The wall of the Temple of Peace where the Severan marble plan once hung (photo: Wikimedia Commons)

Was the Forma Urbis Romae the Oldest Roman Map?

While the Forma Urbis Romae is among the oldest surviving large-scale maps of Rome, it may not have been the first. There is ongoing debate about whether a similar monumental map existed before Severus’ plan. Evidence from archaeological and literary sources hints at earlier representations of Rome, possibly used for administrative or ceremonial purposes, but no definitive pre-Severan maps have been discovered.

Did the Romans Have Accurate Maps?

The Forma Urbis demonstrates the Romans’ impressive ability to create precise architectural renderings, likely informed by cadastral surveys and advanced land measurement techniques. Roman maps, such as the Peutinger Map, further reveal their capacity to map vast territories and connect regions through detailed road networks. Although not always geographically accurate by modern standards, Roman maps provided essential guidance and visualizations for imperial governance, emphasizing strategic and political aspects of the empire’s expanse.

Conjectural reconstruction of the Forma Urbis Romae

Conclusion

The Forma Urbis Romae endures as a powerful symbol of Rome’s imperial ambition, urban organization, and architectural sophistication. The fragments of this marble map are not just remnants of stone but are pieces of a narrative that link modern viewers to an era when Rome was the heart of a vast empire. Now preserved for public admiration in the Museo della Forma Urbis, the map continues to fascinate and inspire, affirming the ingenuity of ancient Rome’s mapmakers and their lasting contribution to the history of urban cartography.

A Knot That Has Remained Intact for 2,000 Years: The Remarkable Suebi Knot of the Osterby Man

In a bog near the small northern German town of Osterby, preserved against time and the elements, lies one of the most fascinating remnants of ancient Germanic culture: the Suebi knot. This hairstyle, sported by the Suebi—a group of Germanic warriors from the Baltic region—has captivated archaeologists, historians, and enthusiasts of ancient cultures for decades. A seemingly simple hair knot, it has withstood the test of two millennia, preserving a connection to a civilization defined by strength, social stratification, and martial prowess.

The Significance of the Suebi Knot

The Suebi knot was more than a hairstyle; it was a symbol steeped in meaning. For the Suebi people, styling the hair by parting it into two locks tied at the sides of the head carried significance that went far beyond personal vanity. Reserved solely for warriors and nobles, the knot became a powerful emblem of rank, valor, and the fierce warrior culture that underpinned Suebi society. To wear the Suebi knot was to declare one’s status and strength, serving both as a social marker and a tool of intimidation against enemies.

This hairstyle also speaks volumes about the complex structure of Suebi society. Unlike some other ancient tribes where social distinctions were less visible, the Suebi’s style of hair symbolized a rigid social order where only individuals of certain stature could wear the knot. Common folk or lower-ranked individuals were not permitted to don this hairstyle, reinforcing the Suebi’s warrior-centric identity and the value placed on martial skill and noble lineage.

The Discovery of the Osterby Man

The most striking and well-preserved example of the Suebi knot was discovered by chance in 1948. Local peat diggers working near Osterby unearthed a skull with reddish hair, styled in the characteristic Suebi knot, which had astonishingly survived the wear of time and weather. The acids naturally present in the peat bog had preserved the head, creating an almost mummified effect known as a “bog body,” or “swamp mummy.”

Dating back to between 75 and 130 AD, the Osterby Man’s head stands as a testament to the durability of this hairstyle and offers a unique glimpse into Suebi life. The reddish color of his hair is thought to be the result of centuries of exposure to the acidic bog environment. Despite the passage of nearly two thousand years, the Suebi knot remains impeccably styled on the Osterby Man’s head, offering an incredibly well-preserved image of this ancient warrior tradition.

Bog Bodies and Their Archaeological Significance

Bog bodies are one of archaeology’s most intriguing phenomena. Bodies preserved in bogs, or “peat bogs,” undergo a unique form of preservation due to the combination of acidic water, low temperature, and lack of oxygen. This combination prevents the growth of bacteria that would typically decompose a body, preserving both organic and inorganic materials in a way that has fascinated scientists for centuries. Northern Europe is particularly known for its bog bodies, with notable examples including the Tollund Man in Denmark and Lindow Man in England.

These bog bodies provide unparalleled insights into ancient life, and the Osterby Man is no exception. Unlike most other bog bodies, which are fully preserved, only the head of the Osterby Man remains. Nonetheless, this single, well-preserved head has given historians and archaeologists invaluable clues about Suebi culture, customs, and the importance of warrior identity in their society.

The Suebi Knot as a Cultural Artifact

For archaeologists, the Suebi knot represents more than a relic of personal grooming—it is a historical artifact that communicates layers of social, cultural, and martial significance. To recreate the Suebi knot, the Suebi would part their hair down the center and pull each section into tightly tied knots at the sides of the head, creating a style both distinct and imposing. This hairstyle may have also served practical purposes in battle, as tightly bound hair was less likely to interfere during combat. For the Suebi, however, the knot’s symbolism likely held more importance than its function.

The hairstyle also suggests that the Suebi were acutely aware of the psychological impact of their appearance. In battle, a warrior with the Suebi knot would have stood out, his knot symbolizing power, rank, and the martial prowess that the Suebi revered. The hair, styled so intentionally, would have created a fearsome presence on the battlefield, projecting an aura of both menace and authority to foes and allies alike.

The Osterby Man Today: A Link to the Past

The Osterby Man’s head, with its Suebi knot intact, currently resides in the archaeological museum of Gottorf Castle in Schleswig. Here, visitors can witness firsthand the enduring legacy of Suebi culture and marvel at the durability of ancient traditions. Located in a historic residence of the Oldenburg family, Gottorf Castle houses various relics that illustrate the rich tapestry of northern European history, but few are as remarkable as the Osterby Man.

As visitors gaze upon the Osterby Man, they are not simply observing an ancient skull—they are engaging with a relic of a society that valued honor, strength, and social structure. The Suebi knot endures as a lasting symbol of this civilization’s priorities and cultural pride.

The Lasting Legacy of the Suebi Knot

The Suebi knot, preserved through centuries on the Osterby Man, stands as a powerful reminder of the social codes, martial traditions, and distinct identity of the Suebi people. From a hairstyle to an emblem of social rank, the Suebi knot was more than mere decoration. It was a badge of honor, a social marker, and a psychological weapon—one that has now become a key piece of evidence in understanding the lives of ancient Germanic tribes. As a lasting legacy, it continues to fascinate modern audiences and invites us to reflect on the ways human societies, both past and present, use symbols to communicate identity, power, and pride.

The knot, 2,000 years after it was first tied, remains intact—a tribute not just to the durability of hair but to the endurance of a culture’s ideals, values, and expressions.

The Mycenaean Necromanteion of Palaiokastro: The Oldest Ritual Site in Greece

---

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS

---

The village of Palaiokastro in Gortynia, Arcadia, although small with few inhabitants, hosts one of the most significant archaeological sites of the Mycenaean period in Greece. The Mycenaean cemetery and the ancient necromanteion discovered there reveal new aspects of Greece’s prehistory, offering significant insights into the religious and ritual practices of the Mycenaeans. These findings bring to light part of the mysterious world of religion and death cults of the time, while the potential link between the site and the Homeric city of Pherae (Phere) adds particular importance to the location.

The Extensive Mycenaean Cemetery

The archaeological excavations on the hill of Palaiokastro, which began in 1955 and continued systematically from 1979, brought to light a large Mycenaean cemetery. With a total of 500 tombs, of which approximately 150 have been excavated, the cemetery is considered the largest discovered in Greece. The tombs, of various types such as tholos, chamber, shaft, and box-shaped, reveal the long-term use of the site for over 400 years, from 1500 to 1100 BCE.

The rich burial offerings discovered in the tombs, including gold jewelry and pottery, indicate the prosperity of the community that lived there. These findings are exhibited at the Archaeological Museum of Tripoli and demonstrate the region’s connection with broader cultural and trade exchanges of the Mycenaean era. The significance of the cemetery is immense, as it sheds light on previously unknown aspects of Mycenaean burial and social life.

The Mycenaean Necromanteion

Within the cemetery, a ritual structure was found, which, according to archaeologist Theodoros Spyropoulos, functioned as a necromanteion. This necromanteion, the only one of the Mycenaean period discovered to date, is considered the oldest in Greece and operated from 1600 to 1200 BCE. It is an underground chamber tomb with a corridor and chamber, where a platform was found with a small house-like structure and a pillar-shaped boulder (baetyl) that served as an aniconic representation of a deity.

The unique construction of the necromanteion, with openings in the walls and a libation basin in the ceiling, resembles the Nekyia described in Homer’s Odyssey. The “psychagogoi"—holes in the walls—suggest the use of the site for summoning the dead. The necromanteion of Palaiochastro was likely used for rituals related to ancestor worship and communication with the underworld, offering rare insights into Mycenaean religious practices.

The Significance of Homeric Pherae

One of the most enigmatic issues related to Palaiochastro is its potential connection to the Homeric city of Phere, as described in Book XI of the Odyssey. According to historian Konstantinos Syriopoulos, the area of Palaiochastro likely corresponds to the capital of King Orsilochus’s kingdom, which hosted Telemachus on his journey to Sparta.

The geographical location of Palaiokastro, near the rivers Alpheios and Bouphagos, along with its strategic position offering panoramic views, supports this hypothesis. If this identification is correct, Mycenaean topography takes on new dimensions, as the Mycenaean site of Kakovatos is also identified with Nestor’s Pylos. Thus, Palaiokastro is not only linked to the world of religion and the dead but also to the geography and history of the Homeric era.

Conclusion

Palaiochastro in Gortynia is one of the most important archaeological sites in Greece. The extensive Mycenaean cemetery, along with the unique necromanteion, sheds light on the religious life and burial practices of the Mycenaeans, while its potential identification with Homeric Phere opens new avenues for understanding the topography and history of the Homeric period. This site, with its ancient religious and cultural significance, offers invaluable insights into the prehistoric world of Arcadia and its long-standing use.

Mycenaean Terms Found in Phrygian Inscription: Uncovering a Greek-Phrygian Isogloss

---

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

---

The relationship between Greek and Phrygian languages has long intrigued scholars, particularly because of the potential linguistic connections that may hint at deeper cultural and historical ties between these ancient peoples. One of the most fascinating aspects of this relationship is the presence of a prehistoric Greek-Phrygian isogloss, as evidenced by inscriptions and etymological studies. This article will delve into the significance of this isogloss, focusing on the connections between the Mycenaean words wanax (ϝἄναξ) - lawagetas (λαϝαγἐτη) and their Phrygian counterparts, as well as the broader implications for our understanding of the interactions between these ancient cultures.

The Phrygian Inscription and the Midas Monument

A significant piece of evidence for the Greek-Phrygian isogloss comes from an inscription found at the Midas Monument, which dates back to the 8th century BC. The inscription, engraved on the upper left part of the monument and written in a dextroverse (left-to-right) direction, reads as follows:

ates : arkiaevaīs : akenanogavos : midaī : lavagtaeī : vanakteī : edaes.

This text has been translated as: "Attes, the son of Archias, the akenanogavos, made (it) for Midas, the leader (and) the king."

The words "lavagtaei" (λαϝαγέτη) and "vanaktei" (ἄνακτι) appear side by side, providing a direct link between the Phrygian and Greek languages. The term "vanaktei" is particularly notable, as it is derived from the Mycenaean Greek word wanax, which means "king" or "ruler."

The Etymology of Lafagetes and Wanax According to Historical-Comparative Linguistics and Common Indo-European Roots

The word wanax has been the subject of much scholarly debate, particularly regarding its etymology and its potential connections to other Indo-European languages. Until recently, wanax was considered a word of uncertain or unknown origin, with no convincing cognates identified in other languages. However, the research of scholars like Ivo Hajnal has provided new insights into its possible connections with Phrygian.

The etymology of the words lawagetes (λαϝαγἐτης) and wanax (ἄναξ) presents a rich field of study within historical-comparative linguistics, illustrating their deep Indo-European connections. Lawagetes (ra-wa-ke-ta) is derived from the components λαϝός meaning 'army' or 'to gather an army,' and the root hag- (ἄγω), meaning 'to lead or drive' (*leh₂mo-h₂eg-et-). This composite meaning of 'army leader' or 'commander' reflects the sociopolitical role of a leader in an early Greek context. The term wanax, similarly, is traced back to the Mycenaean word wa-na-ka and is often used to denote 'king' or 'ruler.' Its Indo-European roots appear connected to the notion of a leader or protector, with cognates potentially present in other Indo-European languages such as Sanskrit and Phrygian.

The analysis of wanax offers particular intrigue due to its parallel development with other Indo-European terms. According to Hajnal, the word wanax (or more accurately ϝανακτ-ς with the original digamma sound “ϝ”) shares morphological features with the word laϝagetes, both following a productive pattern in ancient Greek word formation. This pattern involves a thematic element and the suffixes (-t- and -s), which can be traced back to older Indo-European linguistic structures. The phonological evolution of wanax and its formation from roots like *h₂eǵ- ('to lead') highlights its meaning as a leader or authority figure, a concept mirrored in Phrygian and possibly even Sanskrit equivalents (*h₂n̥-h₂eg-et-s).

The comparative study of wanax in Greek and its counterparts in other Indo-European languages reveals the common cultural emphasis on rulership and protection. For instance, the Sanskrit word vaṇij- (meaning 'merchant') has been proposed as an etymological cousin to wanax, emphasizing the protector or leading role of figures like Indra, a god associated with kingship and power in early Indo-Aryan society. This comparison not only underlines the structural similarities between these languages but also reinforces the cultural and symbolic significance of leadership across the Indo-European world. As such, the words laϝagetes and wanax serve as linguistic relics of a shared Indo-European heritage, reflecting common themes of authority, protection, and social hierarchy.

Hajnal argues against the possibility of a Greek loanword in Phrygian, pointing to the presence of Phrygian anthroponyms such as Wanaxos, Wanaxon, or Wanaxion, which are formed based on the word wanak(t)s. This suggests a prehistoric isogloss—a shared linguistic feature—between Greek and Phrygian that predates their separation as distinct languages. This isogloss indicates a common linguistic heritage and possibly points to a period of intense interaction or even a shared linguistic ancestry between the Greeks and Phrygians.

The Greek word wanax itself has been linked to other Indo-European languages through various linguistic reconstructions. According to Hajnal, the word likely derives from a Proto-Indo-European root, and its morphology follows the same pattern as other ancient Greek words, such as λαγέτας (a leader or commander), which is itself related to wanax. This connection further strengthens the argument for a prehistoric isogloss and highlights the deep linguistic ties between Greek and Phrygian.

The Broader Implications of the Greek-Phrygian Isogloss

The existence of a Greek-Phrygian isogloss has significant implications for our understanding of the ancient world. First and foremost, it suggests that the Greeks and Phrygians shared more than just a geographic proximity—they also shared linguistic and, by extension, cultural elements. This challenges the traditional view of these cultures as entirely separate and independent and opens the door to new interpretations of their interactions.

Furthermore, the linguistic connections between Greek and Phrygian may also shed light on the broader question of Indo-European migrations and the spread of languages across the ancient world. The isogloss between Greek and Phrygian suggests a period of close contact, possibly during the Bronze Age, when these languages were still in the process of differentiation. This could imply that the Phrygians, who are traditionally believed to have migrated to Anatolia from the Balkans, may have had more prolonged and significant interactions with the Mycenaean Greeks than previously thought.

The Greek-Phrygian Linguistic Connection

The article explores the deep linguistic and historical connections between the Greek and Phrygian languages, two members of the Indo-European family. Scholars suggest that some Neo-Phrygian inscriptions may represent an Achaean Greek dialect, indicating potential linguistic convergence or a shared ancestral language. This relationship is further supported by the broader cultural and linguistic interactions across the eastern Mediterranean, where both languages were spoken in close geographical proximity.

Linguistic evidence reveals that Greek is widely regarded as the closest relative of Phrygian, with numerous shared phonological, morphological, and lexical features, suggesting a possible proto-Graeco-Phrygian stage. However, the fragmentary nature of the Phrygian language and the influence of other ancient Anatolian languages like Lydian and Hittite complicate the task of determining whether these similarities are due to common ancestry or later borrowing. This issue makes it challenging to definitively reconstruct the exact nature of the relationship between the two languages.

The study of Greek and Phrygian has significant implications for understanding the Indo-European language family. If a proto-Graeco-Phrygian language did exist, it could reshape current theories about the spread and development of Indo-European languages. The close relationship between Greek and Phrygian also provides valuable insights into the cultural and linguistic exchanges that occurred in the eastern Mediterranean and Anatolia during antiquity, offering a more nuanced understanding of the linguistic landscape of the region.

In conclusion, the study of the prehistoric Greek-Phrygian isogloss, exemplified by the connections between the Mycenaean word wanax and its Phrygian counterparts, offers valuable insights into the complex linguistic and cultural relationships of the ancient world. As scholars continue to explore these connections, we can expect to gain a deeper understanding of how these ancient peoples interacted, influenced each other, and contributed to the rich tapestry of human history.

The Neolithic Site of Dispilio: Interactive Learning of a Neolithic Settlement in Northern Greece

---

Text-Photos BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS

---

Dispilio Open-Air Museum: Educational Journey Through Time in a Greek Neolithic Village

Nestled on the shores of Lake Orestiada in northern Greece lies Dispilio, a remarkable archaeological site that offers a unique window into Neolithic life. Discovered in 1932 and excavated systematically since 1992, this ancient lakeside settlement, dating back to 5600/5000 BC, has reshaped our understanding of prehistoric cultures in the region. The site's significance is further enhanced by the Dispilio Lakeside Neolithic Settlement Archaeological Collection, an open-air museum designed to educate and engage both children and adults in the wonders of ancient life.

The Excavation: A Journey Back in Time

On the southwest shore of Lake Orestidos, in the Dispelio of Kastoria, is the archaeological site "Nisi"” where a group of Neolithic farmers, herders, and fishermen settled 7500 years ago. The site has been in use for over 2500 years. The archaeological site became known in 1932, when the archaeologist Antonios Keramopoulos identified findings that he correctly attributed to the Neolithic Era.

View fullsize

View fullsize

G. H. Chourmouziadis (1932–2013), a professor of prehistoric archeology at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, started the systematic excavation research and study of the lake Neolithic settlement in 1992. Kostas Kotsakis, a professor of prehistoric archeology at the AUTH, has continued the research since 2014.

The excavation of Dispilio has revealed a wealth of artifacts and structures that illuminate the daily lives of its ancient inhabitants. Key finds include wooden structural remains, ceramic pots, stone and bone tools, and a notable discovery: the Dispilio Tablet. This wooden tablet, inscribed with a still-unciphered script, is among the earliest examples of writing in Europe, predating the Greek alphabet by millennia. These findings not only offer insights into the technological and cultural practices of the Neolithic people but also challenge the traditional narrative of the advent of civilization in Europe.

A Dispilio Tablet representation / Photo: DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS

The Open Museum: An Educational Oasis

The Dispilio Open-Air Museum, established near the excavation site, serves as a living museum. It aims to recreate the Neolithic way of life, providing a tangible and interactive experience for visitors. The museum's exhibits are not confined within walls; instead, they are spread across the lakeside, mirroring the layout of the original settlement.

For Children: A Hands-On Experience

The museum is particularly engaging for younger visitors. It offers a range of interactive activities designed to immerse children in Neolithic culture. These include workshops on pottery making, weaving, and tool-making, where children can use materials and techniques similar to those employed by the ancient inhabitants of Dispilio. Such hands-on experiences are invaluable in making history tangible and exciting for the younger generation, fostering an early interest in archaeology and history.

For Adults: A Deeper Understanding

Adult visitors are not left out of the learning experience. Guided tours provide in-depth insights into the daily life, rituals, and crafts of the Neolithic people. Additionally, the museum organizes special lectures and exhibitions that delve into various aspects of Neolithic life, from diet and domestic activities to trade and social organization. These programs are designed to cater to the interests of history enthusiasts and scholars alike, offering a comprehensive view of life in ancient Dispilio.

The Significance of Dispilio in Neolithic Studies

The findings at Dispilio have significantly contributed to the field of Neolithic studies. The site offers evidence of early agricultural practices, the domestication of animals, and the development of complex societal structures. It challenges the Eurocentric view of history, highlighting the advanced nature of prehistoric civilizations in the Balkans. Dispilio stands as a testament to the rich cultural heritage of the region and as a reminder of the complexity and diversity of human history.

Dispilio's Legacy in Enlightening Future Generations

Dispilio is more than an archaeological site; it is a bridge connecting the past and the present. The open-air museum serves as an educational platform, bringing history to life for visitors of all ages. It plays a crucial role in preserving and disseminating knowledge about Neolithic culture, ensuring that the lessons of the past continue to inform and inspire future generations. As we walk through the reconstructed huts and handle the replicas of ancient tools, we are reminded of the enduring legacy of our ancestors, whose ingenuity and resilience laid the foundations of modern civilization.

The Enigmatic Pashupati Seal: The First depiction of Yoga?

---

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS

---

Unraveling the Mystery Behind the Pashupati Seal: A Glimpse into Ancient Yoga and Indus Valley Religion

The Pashupati Seal, excavated from the ancient ruins of Mohenjo-daro, remains one of the most enigmatic and intriguing artifacts of the Indus Valley Civilization. Discovered during the Archaeological Survey of India's 1928–29 exploration, this steatite seal, dating back to the Intermediate I Period (circa 2350–2000 BCE), offers a rare glimpse into the religious and cultural milieu of one of the world's earliest urban societies.

At the heart of the Pashupati Seal is a depiction that has sparked considerable debate among historians and archaeologists: a seated, possibly tricephalic figure, surrounded by animals. This figure, adorned with a horned headdress, has led to various interpretations, one of the most significant being its potential representation as an early form of the Hindu deity Shiva, known as "Pashupati," or Lord of Animals.

The depiction of the figure, potentially ithyphallic—a characteristic attributed to fertility or cosmic potency—was supported by the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) specialist Jonathan Mark Kenoyer in 2003. However, this interpretation has not been universally accepted, with some scholars questioning the hyperbolic nature of the figure.

What makes the Pashupati Seal particularly fascinating is its complexity and the prominence of a human figure, which is atypical in the context of the thousands of seals unearthed from the Indus Valley, where animals usually dominate the imagery. This uniqueness has fueled the theory that the seal may represent one of the earliest known depictions of Yoga, pointing to a possible ancient origin of this spiritual and ascetic discipline.

DescriptionThe Pashupati Seal is a steatite seal that was discovered at the Mohenjo-daro archaeological site of the Indus Valley Civilization. The seal depicts a seated figure that is possibly tricephalic. It was once thought to be ithyphallic, an interpretation that is now mostly discarded. Indiashastra

However, contemporary scholars lean towards viewing the Pashupati Seal through a broader lens. Rather than seeing it as a direct precursor to later Hindu deities or yogic practices, it is increasingly considered part of a larger tradition of "Lord of the Beasts" or "Master of Animals" motifs, prevalent in Eurasian Neolithic mythology and ancient Near Eastern and Mediterranean art. This interpretation aligns the figure with a wider array of horned deities prevalent in various ancient cultures.

Important from a religious point of view are also the representations of fish, both on seals and on the ceramics of the specific era. The Sumerian god of waters, Enki, had the fish as his sacred symbol, while in Indian mythology, Varunas is the god of all water creatures. The connection between alligator fish and the deity Shiva, as known in this particular seal, also exists in later Hinduism.

This perspective broadens our understanding of the Indus Valley Civilization's religious beliefs, suggesting that they might have shared cultural and mythological elements with contemporary civilizations. It underscores the interconnectedness of ancient societies and the diffusion of religious and symbolic motifs across regions.

In conclusion, while the Pashupati Seal continues to be a subject of academic debate and intrigue, its value in providing insights into the religious life and artistic expression of the Indus Valley Civilization is indisputable. Whether it represents an early form of Shiva, a precursor to yogic practices, or a more universal archetype of a horned deity, it stands as a testament to the complexity and sophistication of one of humanity's earliest urban cultures. The seal not only invites us to delve deeper into the enigmatic world of the Indus Valley but also to appreciate the rich tapestry of ancient mythologies and religious practices that have shaped human civilization across millennia.

7 Lost Ancient Languages And Scripts That Have Not Yet Been Deciphered

---

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS

---

1. LINEAR A

2. THE RONGORONGO SCRIPT OF EASTER ISLAND

3. THE INDUS VALLEY SCRIPT

4. CRETAN HIEROGLYPHS

5. LINEAR ELAMITE

6. ETRUSCAN LANGUAGE

7. THE OLMEC SCRIPT

---

The Enigma of Lost Languages: Deciphering the Undeciphered

The study of ancient languages and scripts is a window into the past, offering insights into the cultures, thoughts, and lives of civilizations long gone. The mystery of languages and scripts that have resisted deciphering, however, frequently leaves this window partially closed. Here, we explore six such enigmatic languages and scripts, each a tantalizing puzzle for linguists and historians.

1. Linear A

Originating in ancient Crete and the Aegean Islands during the Minoan civilization (circa 1800–1450 BCE), Linear A is the earliest script used to write the Minoan language. Its symbols are primarily linear, hence the name. While its successor, Linear B, was deciphered in the 1950s as an early form of Greek, Linear A remains a mystery. It's believed to be a syllabic script, but the language it represents does not relate to any known language family, leaving its contents largely speculative.

The enigmatic Linear A script, which still resists decipherment, continues to be a subject of intense scholarly debate. Central to these discussions is the origin of the Minoan language it represents. Some theorists propose an Anatolian origin, connecting the Minoans with the wider linguistic tapestry of ancient Western Asia. The languages of Carian, Luwian, and Lycian, among others, have been considered possible relatives or predecessors to Minoan due to geographical proximity and certain linguistic parallels. The Carian language, though poorly understood, shares the Aegean's penchant for syllabic scripts, which adds weight to the argument for a potential link. Luwian and Lycian, similarly, offer comparative script and linguistic features that tantalize researchers looking for a key to the Linear A puzzle.

2. The Rongorongo Script of Easter Island

Rongorongo is a system of glyphs discovered on Easter Island in the 19th century. It's unique in that it's the only script indigenous to Oceania. The script consists of intricate, repetitive glyphs carved on wood, and it's believed to have been a central part of the island’s Rapa Nui civilization. Some hypothesize that it represents a proto-writing system, but without a Rosetta Stone-like artifact, its full understanding remains elusive.

3. The Indus VALLEY Script

The Indus Valley Script is linked to the Indus Valley Civilization (circa 2600–1900 BCE), one of the world's earliest urban cultures, located in what is now Pakistan and northwest India. This script is found on a variety of artifacts, including pottery and seal stones. Despite extensive studies, it has not been conclusively deciphered, and there is even debate over whether it represents a language or a more symbolic system of proto-writing.

4. Cretan Hieroglyphs

Distinct from Linear A, Cretan hieroglyphs were used in Crete at the beginning of the 2nd millennium BCE. They are contemporary with the earliest Egyptian hieroglyphs and may represent a similar mixed system of ideograms and phonetic writing. However, the small number of inscriptions and their brief nature make it difficult for linguists to draw meaningful conclusions about the script and the language it encodes.

The Phaistos Disc, discovered in Crete, is a unique artifact dating back to the Minoan Bronze Age (2nd millennium BCE). It is a fired clay disc on which those mysterious hieroglyphic symbols are stamped in a spiral arrangement on both sides. These symbols appear nowhere else, and their significance, as well as the disc’s purpose, remains a matter of debate. Some scholars suggest it might be a hymn, a narrative, or even a coded message.

5. linear elamite

Big efforts by archaeologists have been made lately to decipher an ancient writing system called Linear Elamite, which was used in what is now Iran a long time ago. This writing system has been a mystery for a very long time. Just like how Egyptian hieroglyphics were deciphered with the help of the Rosetta Stone, scholars have struggled to understand Linear Elamite. Francois Desset, a French archaeologist leading a group of European researchers, thinks they have made progress.

They used ancient silver beakers with inscriptions to develop a method for reading Linear Elamite symbols. If their findings are correct, they could provide insights into a little-known society that existed between Mesopotamia and the Indus River Valley at the dawn of civilization. The story goes back more than 5,000 years to a city called Susa, which was part of the early development of written language in the region. Linear Elamite was used, but it disappeared, and scholars have been trying to understand it for a long time.

Francois Desset's work involved examining ancient silver vessels with inscriptions, and he claims to have made significant progress in deciphering Linear Elamite symbols. However, there is still work to be done to fully understand this ancient writing system. Desset's work has also led to some controversial claims, such as Linear Elamite being an innovative system that relies solely on syllables and the suggestion that Proto-Elamite and Sumerian cuneiform are contemporaneous, challenging previous beliefs.

6. Etruscan Language

While not entirely undeciphered, the Etruscan language, used in ancient Italy, still poses significant challenges. We understand some of its vocabulary and structure thanks to bilingual inscriptions and borrowings in Latin. However, much of the language, especially its non-Latin vocabulary, remains enigmatic. The Etruscans were a significant influence on Roman culture, and a full understanding of their language could provide deeper insights into the early history of Italy.

7. The Olmec Script

The Olmec script, associated with one of Mesoamerica's earliest major civilizations, remains largely undeciphered, presenting a significant challenge to scholars. Key artifacts such as the Cascajal Block and markings on La Venta Monuments provide limited evidence of this potential writing system. The primary obstacles in deciphering the script include the scarcity of artifacts bearing the script, the absence of a bilingual artifact akin to the Rosetta Stone, and the script's isolation from known languages. Despite these challenges, understanding the Olmec script could offer critical insights into the Olmec civilization, often regarded as the precursor to later Mesoamerican cultures, and shed light on the development of writing in the Americas.

Conclusion

These ancient scripts and languages represent some of the most intriguing puzzles in linguistics and archaeology. Each holds the potential to dramatically alter our understanding of human history, offering insights into the cultures, beliefs, and daily lives of ancient peoples. The decipherment of these scripts would not only be a triumph of linguistic and archaeological scholarship but would also bring us closer to our shared human past. As technology advances, and with the relentless curiosity and scholarly rigor of historians and linguists, we may one day unlock the secrets they hold.

The Earliest Evidence of Cremation in Archaeology

Cremation, the act of reducing a body to ashes by exposing it to intense heat, has been a method of disposing of the dead for millennia. Archaeological findings have shed light on the earliest evidence of this practice, revealing intriguing insights into ancient rituals and beliefs.

The Mungo Lady of Australia

Perhaps the most ancient evidence of cremation comes from the Lake Mungo region in New South Wales, Australia. Dating back approximately 42,000 years, the remains of the 'Mungo Lady' display a multi-stage burial process. Her partially burned remains were gathered, crushed, and then burned again before final burial. The care given to this process speaks to its deep ritual significance, suggesting that these ancient people had complex beliefs about death and the afterlife.

The Mungo Lady, discovered in 1969 by Dr. Jim Bowler, represents not just an archaeological milestone but also a profound cultural and spiritual insight into the lives of ancient Indigenous Australians. Her remains, found in the Willandra Lakes Region, a UNESCO World Heritage site, illustrate a complex and sophisticated mortuary practice that predates many other known cremations worldwide. This discovery challenged previous notions about the sophistication of ancient cultures, particularly those outside the well-documented histories of Europe and the Near East. The care in the treatment of the Mungo Lady's remains—the burning, crushing, and second burning of her bones—indicates a ceremonial respect and possibly a belief in an afterlife or the importance of ritualized send-off for the dead.

The discovery of the Mungo Lady holds significant contemporary relevance, especially in discussions about the history and rights of Indigenous Australians. Her remains, along with those of the Mungo Man found in the same area, have become central in the dialogue about the repatriation of Indigenous human remains. In 1992, in a landmark decision and a sign of respect for the cultural beliefs of the local Aboriginal communities, the remains of the Mungo Lady were returned to her ancestral homeland. This act was a significant step towards acknowledging the deep historical connection between Indigenous Australians and their land, and it set a precedent for similar cases worldwide. Moreover, the Mungo Lady serves as a poignant reminder of the rich and ancient heritage of Aboriginal cultures, underscoring their deep spiritual and physical connection to the Australian landscape.

Cremation in the Near East

In the Near East, the practice of cremation is not as prevalent or ancient as in some other regions, like Europe, primarily due to varying religious and cultural practices in the region. However, there are notable instances where cremation was practiced.

1. Tell Aswad, Syria: One of the earliest examples comes from Tell Aswad in Syria, dating back to around 7000 BCE. This suggests that even in the early Neolithic period, some communities in the Near East were practicing cremation alongside other burial methods.

2. Diversity of Practices: The Near East, known for its cultural and religious diversity in ancient times, showed a range of burial practices. Cremation, while present, was not as dominant as inhumation. The choice between these methods often reflected a variety of factors, including religious beliefs, social norms, and environmental conditions.

3. Influence of Ancient Empires: The spread and influence of various empires, such as the Persians and later the Greeks and Romans, also impacted funerary practices in the Near East. With these influences, cremation might have been adopted in some areas, particularly during the Hellenistic and Roman periods.

Cremation in Europe

Europe, too, has evidence of early cremations. During the Neolithic period, particularly in the late 3rd millennium BCE, cremation became more widespread. The European Bronze Age (c. 2300–750 BCE) witnessed a significant increase in cremation practices, especially in regions such as Britain, Scandinavia, and parts of Central Europe.

In Europe, cremation has a more extensive and varied history, with evidence indicating that it became a widespread practice in certain regions, particularly during the Bronze Age.

1. Bronze Age Cremation: From around 2300 BCE, cremation became increasingly common in Europe, with the Bronze Age seeing a significant rise in this practice. Many people attribute this change to cultural shifts brought about by migration and new technologies.

2. Urnfield Culture: A notable phenomenon in late Bronze Age Europe was the emergence of the Urnfield culture (c. 1300–750 BCE), named after their practice of burying cremation ashes in urns in large fields. These urnfields are found across central and western Europe, indicating a widespread adoption of cremation.

3. Iron Age and Roman Influence: During the Iron Age and under Roman influence, cremation continued to be a popular method of burial in many parts of Europe. The Romans, in particular, practiced cremation extensively until the rise of Christianity, when inhumation became more prevalent.

4. Cultural and Religious Shifts: The decline of cremation in Europe is closely tied to the spread of Christianity, which initially discouraged the practice due to its belief in bodily resurrection. However, variations existed, and in some regions, cremation persisted alongside inhumation for centuries.

5. Archaeological Evidence: European archaeological sites have provided rich evidence of cremation practices, including urns, burial mounds, and remnants of pyres. These findings not only offer insights into the cremation process itself but also into the broader social, cultural, and religious contexts of ancient European societies.

In conclusion, a complex interplay of cultural, religious, and social factors shaped the practices of cremation in the Near East and Europe. While in the Near East, cremation was one of several burial practices and less uniformly adopted, in Europe, it became a widespread and significant practice, especially during the Bronze Age, reflecting profound shifts in societal norms and beliefs.

Significance in Rituals

The choice between cremation and inhumation (burial) often reflected broader societal beliefs and norms. For many ancient societies, fire was a transformative element, believed to cleanse and liberate the spirit. The ashes might have been collected in urns, with urnfield cultures being particularly prevalent in Bronze Age Europe.

Technological Advancements

The rise of cremation as a prevalent burial practice is linked not just to cultural beliefs but also to technological advancements. The construction of pyres or the development of early cremation chambers made the process more efficient. The presence of pottery and urns designed specifically to hold cremated remains suggests a standardized approach to this method of burial over time.

Preservation Challenges

Unearthing evidence of ancient cremations poses unique challenges for archaeologists. Due to the very nature of the act, organic material is often entirely consumed, leaving behind only fragments of bone or traces of ash. Thus, pinpointing the exact prevalence of cremation in ancient cultures can be a challenge. However, advancements in technology and analytical techniques are continually enhancing our understanding.

From the ancient shores of Lake Mungo in Australia to the historical landscapes of Europe and the Near East, cremation has held a significant place in human burial practices. The act not only speaks of the transient nature of life but also sheds light on the beliefs, rituals, and technologies of ancient civilizations. As archaeological studies continue, we can expect even deeper insights into this age-old practice.

The Multilingual Bogazköy Archive: Over 25,000 Cuneiform Tablets Containing 8 Different Languages!

---

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS

---

Exploring the Polyglot World of the Hittite Empire: The Eight Languages of the Boğazköy Tablets

The Boğazköy Archive, discovered amidst the ruins of ancient Hattusa (now Boğazköy), stands as a remarkable testament to the Hittite civilization, a dominant political force in the Middle East during the 2nd millennium B.C. This vast collection of nearly 25,000 cuneiform tablets is the primary source of our knowledge about the social, political, commercial, military, religious, legislative, and artistic facets of this era in Asia Minor and the broader Middle East.

Key Contents of the Archive

The Boğazköy tablets cover an array of subjects, from royal annals, chronicles, decrees, and treaties like the famous Treaty of Quadesh with Egypt to legal codes, mythological texts, lists of rulers, diplomatic correspondence, deeds, codes of laws, court records, mythological and religious texts, astrological predictions, Sumero-Akkado-Hittite dictionaries, and even practical guides on horse breeding. This variety provides a comprehensive view of the Hittite civilization's complexity and sophistication. The overwhelming majority of texts found in the Boğazköy archive belong to the New Hittite period (14th and 13th centuries B.C.), and only a small number of them (including the early version of the laws) go back to the 17th and 16th centuries B.C.

Lion Gate, Hatussa

Archaeological and Linguistic Significance

The discovery and ongoing study of these tablets, initiated by H. Winckler together with Greek-Ottoman archeologist Theodore Makridi Bey, from 1906 to 1912, have significantly advanced our understanding of the Hittite civilization and its interactions with neighboring cultures. The linguistic findings, in particular, have revolutionized Indo-European studies, revealing previously unknown languages and dialects within this family.

The Linguistic Landscape of the Boğazköy Archive

One of the most fascinating aspects of the Boğazköy Archive is its linguistic diversity, which encompasses texts in eight different languages. This polyglot nature highlights the cultural and political influence of the Hittite Empire.

1. Cuneiform Hittite: The role of Cuneiform Hittite in the Hittite Empire cannot be overstated. As the predominant language of the Boğazköy Archive, it offers a direct insight into the administrative, legal, and diplomatic workings of the empire. This version of the cuneiform script, adapted from the earlier Akkadian system, was a vital tool for recording laws, treaties, and royal decrees, serving as the backbone of governance and order in the Hittite state. Its use in diplomatic correspondence, especially in treaties such as the Treaty of Quadesh, underscores its significance as a language of international relations in the ancient Near East.

2. Akkadian: Serving as one of the main languages of the archive, these represent the administrative and diplomatic lingua franca of the ancient Near East. Akkadian, an ancient Semitic language, originated in Mesopotamia around 2500 BC and was extensively used for administration, diplomacy, and literature. Akkadian is divided into two major dialects: Assyrian and Babylonian. It was written using the cuneiform script and is of great historical significance, providing insights into ancient Mesopotamian civilization and culture. Akkadian's influence declined around the 1st millennium BC but left a lasting impact on subsequent languages in the region.

3. Sumerian: A dead language by 1200 B.C., Sumerian's inclusion indicates its continued scholarly significance. The ancient non-Indo-European language of the Sumerian civilization was the first to develop the cuneiform script, which, although already dead at that time, was still being taught.

4. Hurrian: Neither Indo-European nor Semitic, Hurrian reflects Mitanni's influence on the Hittite Empire. It was the language of the Land of the Mitanni, to the east of the Hittite Empire, a significant cultural and political group in the region encompassing parts of modern-day Turkey, Syria, and Iraq. The language is known from texts dating from around 2300 BC to the first century AD. Hurrian played a crucial role in the cultural and political tapestry of the area, especially in the context of its interactions with neighboring civilizations like the Hittites and Assyrians. The language's structure and vocabulary remain a subject of study for linguists, offering insights into the diverse linguistic landscape of the ancient Near East.

5. Luwian: An Anatolian Indo-European language probably spoken in western Anatolia, closely related to Hittite and possibly a precursor to Lycian. The Luwian language, part of the Anatolian branch of the Indo-European family, played a crucial role in the geopolitical dynamics between the Hittite Empire and the independent states of western Anatolia during the Bronze Age. As a language closely related to Hittite, Luwian served as a linguistic bridge, facilitating diplomatic and cultural exchanges between the Hittites and their western neighbors. The presence of Luwian in the Boğazköy Archive, especially in texts related to western regions, indicates its importance in maintaining relationships and asserting influence over these independent states. Luwian's use in regional administrative and diplomatic documents reflects its status as a regional lingua franca, essential for the negotiation of treaties, trade agreements, and alliances.

6. Palaic: Palaic, an ancient Indo-European language, was one of the lesser-known members of the Anatolian language family, alongside Hittite and Luwian. It was primarily spoken in the region of Pala in north-central Anatolia, now part of modern Turkey. Known mainly from cuneiform tablets of the Boğazköy Archive, Palaic's use seems to have been largely religious, dedicated to ritual and liturgical texts. The language provides a glimpse into the linguistic diversity of ancient Anatolia and the religious practices of its people, but much about Palaic remains obscure due to the limited number of texts available.

7. Hattic (Proto-Hittite): A non-Indo-European language, mainly used in ritual texts, offers a window into the religious practices and beliefs of the Hittites. It was primarily used by the Hattians, indigenous inhabitants of central Anatolia. Primarily known from Hittite texts where it is used in religious contexts, Hattic is distinctive for its unique vocabulary and structure, differing significantly from the surrounding Indo-European languages. Despite its limited corpus, Hattic is crucial for understanding the cultural and linguistic prehistory of Anatolia.

8. An Unidentified Language: The eighth language, which is different from the others, has not yet been precisely identified. The only evidence we have is that it contains some Indo-European terms that correspond to a treatise on equestrian art written in Hittite by Kikkuli, a Hurrian from the Land of the Mitanni. There is a possibility that this is the new Anatolian language that linguists have identified as Kalasma.

Anatolia's Linguistic Mosaic: Unraveling the Indo-European and Non-Indo-European Language Blend

The Anatolian languages, a group of now-extinct languages once spoken in ancient Anatolia, have long been shrouded in mystery, particularly to those outside the academic community. The 20th and 21st centuries witnessed a renaissance in the study of these languages, propelled by archaeological discoveries like the Boğazköy Archive. Prior to these findings, knowledge of these languages was limited and fragmented. The decipherment of cuneiform scripts and the unearthing of texts in Hittite, Luwian, and Palaic, among others, revolutionized our understanding of these ancient tongues. Linguists and historians have used comparative methods, drawing parallels with other Indo-European languages, to piece together their phonology, grammar, and vocabulary. This linguistic detective work has been augmented by advancements in technology, including digital analysis and database compilation, allowing for more nuanced and comprehensive interpretations.

Anatolian languages map

These efforts have not only shed light on the linguistic landscape of ancient Anatolia but also provided insights into the historical interactions, migrations, and cultural exchanges in the region. The study of Anatolian languages has thus transformed from a niche academic pursuit into a key component of understanding the ancient world's complexity.

In ancient Anatolia, a fascinating linguistic tapestry emerged from the mix of Indo-European and non-Indo-European languages. This region, a crossroads of cultures and peoples, featured Indo-European languages like Hittite, Luwian, and Palaic alongside non-Indo-European languages such as Hattic and Hurrian. This linguistic diversity reflects Anatolia's role as a melting pot of different civilizations, where a variety of ethnic and linguistic groups interacted, traded, and coexisted, contributing to the rich cultural and historical heritage of the area.

Cuneiform treaty between Hittite ruler Hattushili III and Ramses II, 13th cent. BCE; Pergamon Museum, Berlin

The Boğazköy Archive is not just a collection of ancient texts; it's a cultural and linguistic mosaic that gives us a detailed picture of the Hittite Empire and its interactions with the ancient world. The diversity of languages in the archive reflects the cosmopolitan nature of Hattusa, mirroring the complexity and interconnectedness of ancient civilizations. As studies continue, the archive promises to further illuminate the rich tapestry of human history and language.

Hydraulic Innovation in Bronze Age Aegean: The Plumbing System of Akrotiri, Santorini

---

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS

---

Akrotiri's Legacy in Water Management: The Comprehensive Plumbing of Santorini's Akrotiri

The ancient site of Akrotiri on the island of Santorini, Greece, offers a fascinating glimpse into the advanced urban infrastructure of the Bronze Age. Among its most remarkable features is its sophisticated plumbing system, which highlights the ingenuity and technological prowess of the Cyclado-Minoan civilization. This system, encompassing toilets, drains, and water pipes, reveals a level of complexity and comfort that rivals many modern designs.

Advanced Water Supply Systems

At Akrotiri, archaeologists uncovered a highly advanced water supply network. Made primarily of terracotta or clay, these pipes bear a resemblance to those found in Knossos on Crete. However, Akrotiri's system stands out for its unique dual-piping structure. This double system, believed to have been used for delivering both hot and cold water, is a testament to the Minoan's innovative use of their natural environment. The nearby vast Thira volcanic system, with its abundant thermal energy, likely provided a natural source for hot water. This feature, possibly the earliest instance of a hot and cold water supply in history, illustrates a profound understanding of hydraulic engineering.

The Integration of Bathtubs and Municipal Water Supply

One of the most striking discoveries in Akrotiri was a large, actual bathtub found in one of the houses, indicating the importance of personal hygiene and comfort in Minoan culture. This bathtub, along with other residences, was connected to the municipal water supply, ensuring a steady flow of water for various household needs. The integration of individual bathing facilities with a communal water system speaks volumes about society's organizational skills and their prioritization of public health.

Prehistoric Site of Akrotiri, Santorini, Klearchos Kapoutsis

Innovative Sanitary Plumbing

The sophistication of Akrotiri's plumbing is further evidenced in its sanitary systems. In a notable departure from the crude cesspits common in Europe until the 19th century AD, Akrotiri featured an upstairs latrine in one of the houses, designed in line with Cycladic architectural principles. This latrine was connected to a terracotta drain line, which descended through the exterior wall and connected to the municipal sewage line. This design allowed for effective waste disposal and sanitation, a remarkable feat for its time.

The toilet seat, now hidden away in the museum in Fira, extended back into a framed indentation in the wall, with a masonry block in front providing a comfortable seating position. The slot in this block, serving as the toilet drain, is connected to channels within the wall, possibly for flushing water. This level of detail in sanitary design highlights an advanced understanding of hygiene and comfort.

Map of Akrotiri in the Bronze Age, ca. 1600 BC.

The plumbing system of Bronze Age Akrotiri is a striking example of early engineering excellence. The dual water supply system, integrating hot and cold water, the communal integration of individual bathing facilities, and the advanced design of sanitary plumbing all point to a society that was not only technologically advanced but also deeply concerned with the well-being and comfort of its inhabitants. These features, well ahead of their time, offer a window into the sophisticated urban planning and architectural prowess of the Cyclado-Minoan civilization, marking Akrotiri as a significant site in the study of ancient technologies.