Puduhepa: The Priestess Queen of the Hittite World Who Reorganized and Promoted Religious Syncretism

---

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

---

In the ancient Near East, women often played a secondary role in the political sphere, but there were exceptions who left an indelible mark. One of these exceptions was Puduḫepa, the wife of Hattusili III, king of the Hittites. Puduḫepa was not merely a queen who excelled by her husband's side. With her strong intellect and exceptional leadership abilities, she managed to blend religion and politics, significantly influencing the Hittite world. In this article, we will explore Puduhepa’s biography, her religious and political actions, and the broader impact she had on the events of her time.

The Life of Puduḫepa: From Priestess to Queen

Puduḫepa was born in the city of Lawazantiya, in the heart of Kizzuwatna, a crucial region in southern Anatolia. She was the daughter of the high priest Pentipsharri, who served the goddess Ishtar, the deity of love and war. From an early age, Puduḫepa was raised as a priestess of Ishtar, a role that shaped her spiritual understanding and her ability to navigate both the religious and political realms.

According to tradition, Hattusili III, during one of his military campaigns, met Puduḫepa in Ishtar’s temple and was impressed by her intelligence and spirit. They married, and Puduḫepa found herself in a position of power as queen of the Hittites, alongside Hattusili, who was one of the most powerful monarchs of the era. However, her influence was not confined to her role as queen; she emerged as one of the most active and influential figures in Hittite history.

Snapshot taken from Tolga Örnek's docu-drama on the Hittites

Her Role in Politics: Diplomacy and Peace Treaties

Puduḫepa played a central role in the foreign policy of the Hittite kingdom, particularly in relations with Egypt. She was a key figure in the negotiation of the famous peace treaty between Hattusili III and Pharaoh Ramesses II. This treaty, which is considered one of the first recorded international peace agreements, was solidified by Puduḫepa's diplomatic wisdom and her correspondence with the Pharaoh and the Egyptian court.

Her role was not limited to formal representation; she had a deep understanding of international relations and the need for stability in the region. Through her diplomatic efforts, Puduḫepa laid the groundwork for long-lasting peace, ensuring the safety and prosperity of the Hittites.

The Reorganization of the Hittite Pantheon: The Blending of Religion and Politics

Due to her background as a priestess of Ishtar, Puduḫepa possessed a profound religious sentiment, which was evident in all aspects of her governance. She had a vision to reorganize the religious system of the Hittites and merge the various local and foreign deities into a more unified and coherent structure. This reorganization was not just of religious significance but also political.

Puduhepa makes an offering to the goddess Hepat on a rock-relief at Firaktin. (Tayfun Bilgin)

As the Hittite kingdom was multi-ethnic and multi-religious, Puduḫepa realized that unifying the pantheon could function as a tool for the political unification of the state. She cataloged the deities and elevated royal and state gods to more prominent positions, emphasizing deities that symbolized unity and sovereignty.

This process led to the establishment of an organized and unified religious system that became closely linked to political power. Puduḫepa ensured that the worship of the gods would support and maintain the stability of the Hittite kingdom, while she herself assumed the role of religious mediator, communicating directly with the gods on behalf of the king and the people.

The Legacy of Puduḫepa: A Lasting Mark on Hittite History

Puduḫepa left behind a powerful legacy. Her work as a diplomat, religious reformer, and political leader contributed significantly to the stabilization and strengthening of the Hittite state during Hattusili III’s reign. Her initiatives to unify the pantheon and her broader connection of religion and politics created a strong framework that profoundly influenced the political and religious structure of the Hittites.

Her legacy continued even after her death, as her efforts preserved the Hittite cultural heritage. Her name remained inscribed in records and traditions, and her influence on the reorganization of the religious world laid the foundation for the further development of religious and political thought.

Snapshot taken from Tolga Örnek's docu-drama on the Hittites

Puduḫepa was not just a queen. She was a leading figure who redefined the relationship between religion and politics in the Hittite world. Her political maneuvers and the reorganization of the Hittite pantheon represented a groundbreaking blend of religious devotion and political strategy, creating a legacy that left deep imprints on the history of the Hittites and the broader region.

Child Aged 11 Accidentally Makes Major Archaeological Discovery on Farmland in Britain – 8,500-Year-Old Artifacts Unearthed

Unearthing an 8,500-Year-Old Legacy: How an 11-Year-Old’s Discovery Led to Mesolithic Findings

In an extraordinary twist of fate, what began as a child’s curiosity during a simple field walk 20 years ago has culminated in one of Worcestershire’s most significant archaeological finds. A recent excavation at the Milestone Ground in Broadway has revealed artifacts dating back as far as 8,500 years, shedding new light on Britain’s ancient past. This dig, which has uncovered human and animal bones, Roman pottery, and Mesolithic flints, owes its success to the sharp eyes of an 11-year-old boy, Nathan Hazlehurst, who first stumbled upon key items in 2004.

Nathan, now in his 30s, vividly remembers that fateful day. Bundled up against the cold, he joined other members of the Young Archaeologists’ Club on a field walk, scouring the ground for ancient artifacts. Among his findings were fragments of Roman pottery and a handful of flints, which would later turn out to be significant clues about the area’s rich history. Looking back, Nathan described the experience as “incredible,” recalling how his childhood discoveries helped spark a much larger investigation that is still yielding finds today.

The discovery in Broadway is particularly notable for its Mesolithic evidence, a period stretching back to when Britain was still connected to mainland Europe. Nina O’Hare, an archaeologist from Worcestershire’s Archive and Archaeology Service, noted that these finds could predate the formation of the island itself, offering insight into how human activity evolved during this transformative period.

Jamie Wilkins, another archaeologist involved in the project, expressed excitement over the scope and significance of the dig. “This is the best site I’ve ever worked on,” he shared, explaining that Mesolithic finds are exceptionally rare. The small flints uncovered across the site, often worked into blades, appear to have been used for processing tasks, offering a glimpse into the daily lives of those who inhabited the land thousands of years ago.

The excavation has also unearthed items from the Roman, Saxon, and Neolithic periods, further enriching the timeline of human activity in the region. A cracked beaker vessel, dating from the Early Bronze Age (2400-1700 BC), is just one of the many finds adding depth to Broadway’s story.

These fragments of pottery were found at the site

The Milestone Ground has been a treasure trove of history, with thousands of items collected since the dig began. While the excavation is ongoing, and the site is securely managed, archaeologists expect the project to conclude by the spring of 2025. As work continues, discussions are underway to display some of the more notable finds, providing the public with a rare opportunity to see 8,500 years of history up close.

On 12 October, the site will host an open day, offering guided tours that promise to immerse visitors in the world of Mesolithic life, Roman occupation, and Bronze Age rituals. The event will give the community a chance to explore the remarkable history hidden beneath their feet, much of which was brought to light thanks to the enthusiasm and sharp eyes of a young boy two decades ago.

This beaker vessel dates from the Early Bronze Age between 2400 and 1700BC

The significance of this discovery cannot be overstated. For Nathan Hazlehurst and his fellow young archaeologists, the adventure that started on a cold day in 2004 has blossomed into an archaeological journey of immense historical importance. The finds at Broadway not only enrich the local heritage but also offer invaluable insights into Britain’s ancient past, shaping our understanding of the people who once walked this land long before it became the island we know today.

As Ms. O’Hare aptly put it, “Having that much history to add to Broadway’s story is really rare to find.”

Academy: The Birth of Plato's School and the History Behind Its Name

---

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS

---

Plato's Academy, founded in 387 BC, is undoubtedly one of the most significant landmarks in the history of philosophy and education. The story of this school, however, is directly tied to its location and the legend of the hero Academus, after whom it was named.

The Legend of Academus

The area where Plato founded his Academy was known since ancient times as a place of worship and devotion to the mythical hero Academus. Academus was a hero of Athenian mythology, associated with an important event in the city's history. According to legend, when King Theseus abducted Helen of Sparta, her brothers, the Dioscuri, besieged Athens to free her. It was Academus who revealed to the Dioscuri that Helen had been hidden in the region of Attica, thus preventing the potential destruction of the city. For this act, he was honored by the Athenians, and the area where he lived took his name.

The land surrounding the gymnasium that later became the Academy was already dedicated to Academus, containing temples and olive groves, linking natural beauty with intellectual and academic development. Thus, the name of Plato's Academy is a reference to this ancient hero, blending tradition with the new intellectual movement initiated by Plato.

The Founding of the Academy by Plato

Plato, deeply influenced by his experience with Socrates and his philosophical pursuits, sought a space where he could establish a school of philosophy. In his vision of education and the quest for truth, he found the ideal spot in the gymnasium of Academus, an area located just outside the walls of Athens. In this space, Plato created a garden of philosophical inquiry, which soon developed into one of the most important schools in ancient Greek, and later, world history.

Plato's Academy was not a simple school of learning. It aimed at cultivating the soul, morality, and reason. Plato, as a teacher, did not merely give lectures. Instead, he encouraged discussion, dialectic, and the search for truth through questioning and reflection. This method led to the development of philosophy as a living, creative process rather than merely the memorization of knowledge.

Athens Plato Academy Archaeological Site, Author Tomisti

The Importance of the Academy

Plato's Academy laid the foundation for the development of many fields of knowledge. At the Academy, students did not only engage with philosophy but also with mathematics, physics, politics, and rhetoric. Among Plato's most famous students was Aristotle, who himself made significant contributions to philosophy and science.

The influence of Plato's Academy extends to the present day. The word "academy" is used globally to describe higher educational and research institutions, and the term "academic" is associated with learning, knowledge, and intellectual pursuit.

Plato's Academy was not just a school of philosophy. It was a symbol of the eternal quest for truth and wisdom, embedded in a place already associated with an ancient hero, Academus. Through his work, Plato gave new life to this area and created a space that would forever define the way we understand knowledge and philosophical inquiry.

Jal Mahal: The Water Palace of Jaipur – A Floating Marvel

Nestled in the serene waters of Man Sagar Lake in the heart of Jaipur, India, Jal Mahal, meaning "Water Palace," stands as a breathtaking testament to the architectural brilliance of Rajasthan. The palace, appearing to float on the lake’s surface, has enchanted visitors for centuries with its ethereal beauty, historical significance, and connection to the royal heritage of the region.

A Glimpse into the History

The original construction of Jal Mahal dates back to 1699, during the reign of the then ruler of Amber. However, it was Maharaja Jai Singh II of Amber, a visionary king and patron of architecture, who undertook significant renovations in the early 18th century. His contributions transformed the palace and its surroundings, turning it into the picturesque masterpiece we see today.

At the time, the Man Sagar Lake, too, was enhanced, with its waters harnessed to not only beautify the landscape but also to support irrigation and water management in the arid region. This clever use of nature and architecture made Jal Mahal a vital part of the city’s ecological and cultural landscape.

The Architecture: A Fusion of Styles

Jal Mahal’s design is a harmonious blend of Rajput and Mughal architecture, reflecting the rich history of Rajasthan. From afar, the palace appears to rise out of the water, a mirage of sandstone and elegance. Its five stories are partially submerged, with only the top floor visible above the waterline, adding to the palace’s mystical allure.

The sandstone walls are beautifully contrasted by the lush greenery surrounding the palace. Ornate chhatris (domed pavilions) sit atop each corner of the structure, showcasing intricate carvings and architectural finesse that is typical of the era.

The palace’s interior, though not accessible to the public, is said to feature grand corridors, arches, and halls that once hosted royal gatherings, cultural performances, and celebrations. Its rooftop garden, called Chameli Bagh, provides sweeping views of the lake and the Aravalli hills in the distance, offering a perfect retreat for the royal family.

A Unique Relationship with Nature

What makes Jal Mahal truly special is its symbiotic relationship with the natural world. The palace, partially submerged in the lake, creates a striking reflection in the water, especially during sunrise and sunset. The sight of the palace bathed in golden or crimson hues, mirrored in the still waters of the lake, is a photographer’s dream.

Over the years, efforts have been made to restore the lake and its surrounding ecosystem, allowing birdlife to thrive. Flamingos, pelicans, and other migratory birds now call the lake home during certain seasons, adding to the natural beauty and charm of the palace. The lake’s calming waters and verdant surroundings serve as a peaceful escape from the bustling streets of Jaipur.

Jal Mahal Today: A Symbol of Jaipur’s Legacy

Although visitors cannot explore the interior of Jal Mahal, the palace remains a significant cultural landmark and symbol of Jaipur’s regal past. It is a favorite among tourists and locals alike, offering boat rides on the lake that provide stunning views of the palace and the surrounding landscape.

Whether you’re visiting Jaipur for its vibrant markets, majestic forts, or royal palaces, Jal Mahal offers a serene and unforgettable experience, blending history, architecture, and nature in perfect harmony.

As the "Water Palace" continues to stand gracefully amidst the tranquil waters of Man Sagar Lake, it reminds us of the timeless beauty and ingenuity of India’s royal heritage—a palace that truly seems to float on water, capturing the imagination of all who behold it.

The Temple of Olympian Zeus in Athens: A Monument to the Gods and Power

The Temple of Olympian Zeus, known as the Olympieion, stands as one of ancient Athens’ most significant architectural triumphs, despite its tumultuous and drawn-out history. Originally conceived in the 6th century BCE under the rule of the Athenian tyrant Peisistratos, the temple was intended to be a grand dedication to Zeus, the ruler of the Olympian gods. However, the project’s completion spanned over 600 years, reflecting not only Athens’ evolving political landscape but also the sweeping changes in Mediterranean power dynamics.

A Dream Deferred

The ambitious project of constructing a temple to honor Zeus began during the height of Peisistratos’ influence, but its completion faced many obstacles. After the fall of Peisistratos' tyranny, the building efforts were halted, largely due to the political instability that gripped Athens. Philosophical trends during the Classical period also discouraged the construction of such grand monuments, as Athenians sought to distance themselves from the extravagant displays of power associated with tyrants.

Work on the temple was revived sporadically over the centuries, particularly during the reigns of various Hellenistic rulers, who sought to emulate the grandeur of Athens’ golden age. However, it was not until the 2nd century CE, under Roman Emperor Hadrian, that the Olympieion was finally completed. Hadrian, known for his admiration of Greek culture, took a personal interest in the project and viewed the temple as both a gift to Athens and a symbol of Rome’s growing dominance in the region.

The Temple’s Architectural Grandeur

Upon its completion, the Temple of Olympian Zeus became one of the largest temples in the ancient world. Measuring 110 meters in length and 44 meters in width, the structure featured 104 Corinthian columns, each towering at an impressive 17 meters high. The choice of the Corinthian order, with its intricately carved capitals of acanthus leaves, emphasized the elegance and richness of the design, making it a masterpiece of Hellenistic and Roman architecture.

The temple’s scale was unmatched in Athens, even dwarfing the renowned Parthenon, and it was designed to project not only religious devotion but also the grandeur of the city. Its completion under Roman rule further highlighted Athens’ continuing importance as a cultural hub, even as its political autonomy waned.

A Symbol of Power and Worship

More than just a religious monument, the Olympieion also served as a political symbol. Hadrian commissioned a massive statue of Zeus to be placed inside the temple, along with a statue of himself nearby. These statues were not just tributes to the gods but also served to link the emperor’s image with divine authority, reinforcing Roman power in the Greek world.

The temple’s dedication to Zeus, the king of the Olympian gods, reflected Athens' traditional religious values, but its completion under Hadrian also illustrated the changing nature of power and patronage in the ancient world. Hadrian’s contribution to the Olympieion symbolized the integration of Greek and Roman cultures, showcasing the delicate balance between reverence for the past and the assertion of contemporary imperial authority.

A Legacy in Ruins

Despite its grandeur, the Temple of Olympian Zeus suffered from centuries of neglect, natural disasters, and human intervention. Over time, its materials were quarried for other projects, and only 15 of the original 104 columns remain standing today. These towering columns, however, continue to evoke the awe that ancient visitors must have felt when entering this monumental sanctuary.

The surviving remnants offer a glimpse into the temple’s former magnificence and serve as a lasting testament to Athens’ religious and architectural heritage. Standing amidst the ruins, one is reminded of both the power of the gods in ancient thought and the shifting nature of human power, as the temple's completion marked the transition from Greek independence to Roman dominance.

The Temple of Olympian Zeus remains a symbol of both the cultural and religious aspirations of ancient Athens and the political realities that shaped its development. What began as a dream in the age of tyrants became a reality under the patronage of a Roman emperor, bridging the gap between the golden age of Greece and the expanding influence of Rome. Today, the ruins of the Olympieion stand as a poignant reminder of Athens’ enduring legacy as a center of religion, culture, and architectural brilliance, a legacy that continues to inspire awe in those who visit it.

Old Sarum: A Tapestry of Iron Age, Roman, and Medieval Heritage in Wiltshire

Old Sarum, situated near Salisbury in Wiltshire, England, is one of Britain’s most historically rich and multifaceted sites. Its story stretches back to the Iron Age and continues through the Roman, Saxon, and medieval periods, showcasing the site’s evolving significance over millennia. Today, the remains of its Iron Age hill fort, medieval cathedral, and Norman castle offer a glimpse into the layered history of settlement and fortification in Britain, making Old Sarum a monument of strategic importance and architectural innovation.

The history of Old Sarum begins in the Iron Age, around 400 BCE, when the site was first fortified. The location of Old Sarum atop a prominent chalk hill made it an ideal place for defense, with its commanding views over the surrounding landscape. Its early inhabitants constructed large earthen ramparts and ditches, transforming the hilltop into one of the largest and most formidable hill forts in the region. The proximity to the River Avon and fertile lands also contributed to the settlement’s prosperity, allowing the community to engage in farming, trade, and craft production. For centuries, Old Sarum thrived as a regional center for the local population.

In the 1st century CE, the Romans invaded Britain and quickly recognized the strategic value of Old Sarum’s hill fort. They established a military outpost there, incorporating the existing Iron Age defenses into their operations. Old Sarum became part of the Roman network of forts and roads, serving as a crucial link between Roman towns like Silchester and Winchester. Although the Roman presence at Old Sarum did not lead to extensive urbanization, archaeological evidence of Roman artifacts, including coins and pottery, confirms its role as an administrative and military center. The Roman outpost provided a foundation for the site’s continuing significance in post-Roman Britain.

As the Roman Empire waned and Saxon rule emerged, Old Sarum’s importance did not diminish. In the early medieval period, the site became a focal point for religious and political activity within the Kingdom of Wessex. It was during this era that Old Sarum’s role in the Christianization of the region became particularly significant. The establishment of a bishopric there linked the site to the broader ecclesiastical hierarchy of Saxon England, elevating its religious status.

Following the Norman Conquest in 1066, Old Sarum entered a new phase of development. William the Conqueror recognized its continued strategic importance and ordered the construction of a Norman motte-and-bailey castle. This transformation solidified Old Sarum as a vital military stronghold in southern England, symbolizing Norman dominance. The castle, perched at the heart of the old hill fort, dominated the surrounding landscape, ensuring the Normans could control the local population and defend against potential uprisings. William’s interest in Old Sarum extended beyond its military value, as the site also became a center for administrative governance in the region.

In the 12th century, Old Sarum underwent another significant transformation with the construction of a grand medieval cathedral. This cathedral, located within the outer bailey of the castle, was dedicated to the Virgin Mary and became the seat of the bishop of Salisbury. The combination of ecclesiastical and military structures at Old Sarum made it unique, but it also led to tensions. The close proximity of the clergy and the military garrison created friction, as the clergy felt constrained by the site’s fortifications. Despite these tensions, the cathedral was a remarkable achievement, representing the growing influence of the Church during the medieval period.

However, by the early 13th century, Old Sarum’s location on an exposed hilltop proved increasingly impractical for daily life. Its steep slopes, limited water supply, and the ongoing conflicts between the religious and military communities made it less desirable as a place to live and work. In 1220, Bishop Richard Poore decided to move the cathedral and the ecclesiastical community to a new location near the River Avon, resulting in the foundation of New Salisbury (modern Salisbury). This relocation marked the decline of Old Sarum, as the new site offered easier access to water, flat land for expansion, and a more hospitable environment for both the Church and the laity.

Despite its decline, Old Sarum did not fade from history. In the centuries that followed, it remained a symbol of Britain’s past, with its hill fort and castle standing as reminders of its former grandeur. The site became an object of fascination for antiquarians and archaeologists from the 19th century onward, leading to numerous excavations. These excavations uncovered layers of history, from Roman artifacts to Saxon structures and the remains of the medieval cathedral. The findings from these digs have provided crucial insights into the development of settlement and fortification at Old Sarum.

Today, Old Sarum is managed by English Heritage and continues to attract visitors interested in Britain’s rich history. Visitors can explore the remnants of the Norman castle, walk along the ancient Iron Age earthworks, and view the foundations of the medieval cathedral. The site offers panoramic views of the surrounding Wiltshire countryside, providing a tangible connection to the land and its historical significance. As a place of continuous occupation and adaptation for more than 1,500 years, Old Sarum serves as a microcosm of the broader trends in British history, from prehistory to the medieval period.

The legacy of Old Sarum is one of transformation and continuity. From its origins as an Iron Age hill fort to its role as a Roman military outpost, a Saxon religious center, and a Norman stronghold, the site encapsulates the evolution of British society. Its strategic location, religious importance, and architectural achievements highlight the diverse ways in which power, faith, and society have intersected across the centuries. Old Sarum remains not only an archaeological treasure but also a symbol of Britain’s enduring and complex history.

---

References

• English Heritage: Old Sarum

• Aston, Michael. Archaeology of the British Isles: With a Gazetteer of Sites in England, Wales, Scotland and Ireland. London: Routledge, 2007.

• Baker, John. The Landscape of the Salisbury Plain: From Prehistory to the Present Day. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

• Historic England: Old Sarum Hill Fort

Shopping Amidst History: A Unique Grocery Store in Split, Croatia

In the heart of Split, Croatia, there’s a grocery store unlike any other in the world. Nestled within the historic Diocletian’s Palace complex, this small but fascinating market offers more than just everyday essentials. It occupies the ground floor of the Mala Papalićeva Palača, a 13th-century noble palace, blending modern convenience with layers of ancient history.

Diocletian’s Palace, constructed in the 4th century by the Roman emperor Diocletian, forms the very heart of Split’s old town. In 1979, the entire palace complex gained the prestigious status of a UNESCO World Heritage Site, recognized for its monumental historical and cultural significance.

This stunning architectural marvel draws visitors from across the globe, eager to walk through the corridors of Roman and medieval history.

However, despite its UNESCO protection, the ground floor of the Mala Papalićeva Palača remained privately owned. So, when a grocery store opened its doors there in 2014, locals and tourists alike were caught by surprise. Authorities, while perhaps concerned about this peculiar development, could not prevent the store from operating due to the unique ownership structure of the space.

This blend of modern life and historical preservation makes for an unforgettable shopping experience. Imagine grabbing fresh produce or a loaf of bread while surrounded by stone walls that have stood for centuries, and underneath a roof that once belonged to medieval nobility. The juxtaposition of old and new is tangible—everyday items are sold in a place where, long ago, the footsteps of emperors and merchants echoed through the halls.

While the idea of a grocery store within a UNESCO site may seem unconventional, it only adds to the character of Split’s old town. For those who visit, it’s a chance to be fully immersed in the city’s rich historical layers while completing a mundane task—shopping. It’s not just a grocery run, but a step back in time.

So, if you ever find yourself wandering the labyrinthine streets of Split, make sure to stop by this one-of-a-kind grocery store. It’s a chance to live, quite literally, within history—where modern life and ancient tradition coexist in a truly remarkable way.

Roman Sarcophagus Discovered at Bulgarian Beach Bar Confirmed as Authentic Artifact

A Roman-era sarcophagus, once used as a decorative bar at a beach resort near Varna on the Black Sea, has been identified as a genuine ancient artifact, raising concerns about Bulgaria’s cultural heritage preservation.

Archaeologists from the Regional History Museum in Varna confirmed that the sarcophagus, crafted from shelly limestone typical of northwestern Bulgaria, dates back to Roman times. Its ornate design, including garlands, animal heads, rosettes, and a labrys (a double-headed axe), places it within the "garland sarcophagi" style.

Despite its historical significance, the sarcophagus was repurposed as a bar in a beach club, a situation brought to light when a former police officer, vacationing in Varna, noticed the ancient object and reported it to authorities. Social media posts showing the artifact in use at the club further fueled concerns.

Archaeologist Alexander Minchev emphasized that all archaeological finds in Bulgaria are state property, regardless of how they are discovered. He has called for an investigation into how the sarcophagus ended up at the resort, suspecting it may not be an isolated incident.

Following the report, the sarcophagus was removed from the beach with the assistance of the Interior Ministry and heavy equipment. It has since been transported to the Varna Archaeological Museum, where it will undergo further analysis.

This discovery has ignited a wider conversation in Bulgaria about safeguarding the nation’s rich archaeological heritage and ensuring that such treasures are properly preserved and protected from misuse.

What Was the Real Hair Color of Alexander the Great?

---

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

---

The depiction of Alexander the Great has sparked much debate regarding his physical appearance, especially concerning the color of his hair. The three depictions we share in this article, along with others from European artistic traditions, add complexity to this discussion. Let us examine the matter in detail, drawing upon both ancient sources and later representations.

Depictions of Alexander

Fresco from the Tomb of Philip II in Vergina: The first image, as you mentioned, is believed to depict Alexander, and it is particularly important as it comes from his lifetime. In this depiction, Alexander’s hair appears brown, with a natural shade that does not suggest a blond color. This representation is significant as it was created by an artist who lived in the Macedonian court, offering a likely accurate portrayal of his appearance.

The Alexander Mosaic (House of the Faun, Pompeii): This mosaic depicts Alexander during the battle with Darius III and was created several centuries after his death. Although the hair color is somewhat difficult to interpret due to the mosaic technique, it seems that his hair is brown, further supporting the idea that Alexander was not blond but rather had brown hair with perhaps some lighter tones.

Wall Painting from Triclinium 20: The third image, which presents Alexander during his wedding to Roxane, was created during the Neronian period (54-68 AD), centuries after Alexander’s death. Here, too, Alexander’s depiction with brown hair aligns with other ancient sources.

Ancient Sources on Alexander’s Hair

Ancient written sources do not provide a clear description of Alexander’s hair color, but there are some clues. Plutarch, for instance, mentions that Alexander’s hair had a slightly reddish tone ("xanthochrous"), which could be interpreted as a form of light brown or golden rather than pure blonde.

Later European Representations

Later depictions of Alexander during the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, and the Enlightenment often portray him with blond hair. This likely stems from cultural reasons and ideological projections. In Western art, blond characters were often symbols of heroism, enlightenment, and virtue. Thus, blondness became associated with the idealized figure of Alexander, particularly during the Renaissance, when artists drew inspiration from the ancient Greek classical tradition but filtered it through their own artistic and political ideas.

View fullsize

View fullsize

The question of Alexander the Great’s hair color remains open to interpretation. However, ancient sources and depictions from the Hellenistic and Roman periods tend to show him with brown hair, while later European artists, influenced by their own ideological views, often portrayed him as blond. Examining these varied depictions offers an interesting perspective on how the historical image of Alexander changes according to the cultural and political context of each era.

Wool and the Indo-Anatolian Hypothesis: A Linguistic and Archaeological Approach

Linguistic research on the Indo-European language family has been a cornerstone of historical and archaeological studies, allowing researchers to connect ancient languages with migration and cultural patterns. Within this expansive language family, the Indo-Anatolian hypothesis emerges as a critical sub-theory that suggests that the Anatolian branch, which includes Hittite and Luwian languages, split early from Proto-Indo-European (PIE). This hypothesis reshapes our understanding of language evolution, migration, and the technological developments of ancient civilizations.

Archaeolinguistics has become an essential tool in this interdisciplinary field, marrying linguistic evidence with archaeological findings. One such case is the study of wool and its significance in tracing cultural exchange and technological innovation, particularly in the context of Indo-European-speaking populations and their Anatolian counterparts. Alwin Kloekhorst presented a paper on the Indo-Anatolian hypothesis on October 5 and 6, 2023, using the linguistic evidence surrounding the word "wool" as its main focus.

The Domestication of Sheep and the Rise of Wool Production

The domestication of sheep, dating back to around 8000 BCE in Mesopotamia, plays a vital role in understanding early human economies. Initially, sheep were primarily valued for their meat, milk, and skins. However, by the 6th to 4th millennia BCE, selective breeding led to the emergence of woolly sheep, particularly in regions like Iran. Wool, as a product, revolutionized textile production, and its spread across regions provides critical insights into the technological advancements of ancient cultures.

By the early 3rd millennium BCE, wool production had reached northern Mesopotamia, and there is evidence of woolly sheep dispersal towards the steppes. These developments parallel the spread of Indo-European languages, raising questions about the interconnectedness of linguistic and technological diffusion.

Wool in Anatolian Languages A Linguistic Perspective

In the context of Indo-European languages, wool holds linguistic significance as well. In Hittite, the word for wool appears in various forms, such as the widespread use of the Sumerogram SÍG. Through textual evidence, we see that Hittite used the term "SÍG" for wool, indicating that the knowledge of wool production and weaving was well-established in the Anatolian region.

Interestingly, linguistic analysis shows two distinct stems in the Hittite language for wool: ḫulii̯a- and ḫulan(a)-. Both forms, while indicating wool, exhibit different grammatical usages and highlight how linguistic evolution can track technological innovations, like wool production, in ancient cultures. The suffixes -ii̯a- and -āli- are common Indo-European nominal endings, while -ana- presents an anomaly, showcasing potential inner-Anatolian developments.

Comparative Indo-European Linguistics and the Etymology of Wool

The study of wool across Indo-European languages reveals deep-rooted connections. The word for wool appears in various Indo-European languages, such as:

• Sanskrit: ū́rṇā

• Ancient Greek: λῆνος

• Latin: lāna

• Old Church Slavonic: vlъna

• Lithuanian: vìlna

• Gothic: wulla

These terms trace their origins to the Proto-Indo-European root h2ulh1n(e)h2-, as proposed by researchers like Peters (1980). However, the Anatolian forms present problems when compared with other Indo-European languages. In particular, Proto-Indo-European h2ulh1n(e)h2- does not yield the expected forms in Anatolian, prompting further inquiry into whether these divergences support the Indo-Anatolian hypothesis.

Issues with Etymological Comparisons

One significant issue arises when comparing the Anatolian word for wool with the equivalent terms in other Indo-European languages. Proto-Indo-European consonant clusters, such as Ch1C, usually do not simplify into forms like CaC in Anatolian languages. This divergence is exemplified in the difference between the Proto-Indo-European h2ulh1n(e)h2- and the Hittite form ḫulana-, suggesting an intermediate stage like ḫulna- with an added anaptyctic vowel to preserve phonetic integrity.

Additionally, another issue lies in the absence of h2- in Greek forms like λῆνος and λείνα, complicating efforts to reconcile the Greek and Anatolian data. The Greek evolution seems to imply an older, perhaps Pre-Greek form, while the Anatolian word for wool appears to have developed along a separate trajectory, further supporting the idea of early Anatolian divergence.

Conclusion: Reconsidering the Indo-Anatolian Hypothesis through Wool

The research presented by Alwin Kloekhorst challenges long-held assumptions regarding the presence of a common Proto-Indo-European (PIE) term for wool across the Indo-Anatolian languages. The conclusion that the lexeme h₂ulh₁n(e)h₂- for ‘wool’ likely never existed within PIE forces a reevaluation of how the Indo-Anatolian languages developed in relation to wool-related vocabulary. In particular, the Anatolian word ḫulan-, which refers to wool, appears to be independent of the late PIE term, suggesting that the Anatolian branch diverged early from the rest of the PIE family, long before the spread of wool technology across Eurasia.

Furthermore, the PIE term ulh₁n(e)h₂- seems to have been created later, in the post-Tocharian PIE era, around 2700 BCE. This period aligns with the introduction of wool production to the Pontic steppes, indicating that language adapted alongside technological advancements. The evidence supports the idea that the spread of wool and its associated terminology was not a universal phenomenon across all Indo-European languages but rather emerged as wool became a vital resource in specific regions.

Lastly, the root hul-, found in Anatolian languages, could be a borrowing from external sources, such as Hurrian. This borrowing emphasizes the complexity of linguistic evolution and the significant cultural exchanges between ancient peoples. By integrating linguistic evidence with archaeological data, Kloekhorst’s conclusions offer a more nuanced understanding of the development of wool production and its terminology, illustrating that the linguistic divergences in Anatolia better align with the archaeological timeline of wool's spread than previous theories suggested.

The Mausoleum of Augustus in Rome and Its Influence from the Tomb of Alexander the Great in Alexandria, Egypt

---

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

---

The Mausoleum of Augustus, also known as Mausoleum Augusti, is one of the most significant architectural monuments of ancient Rome, symbolizing the supremacy and immortality of the first Roman Emperor. However, few people know that this mausoleum, designed and constructed during Augustus’ reign, was largely inspired by the tomb of another great leader—Alexander the Great in Alexandria, Egypt. The architecture and symbolic significance of Augustus’ Mausoleum can be better understood through the study of Alexander’s tomb, possibly providing clues to its exact location and structure.

The Historical Significance of the Mausoleum of Augustus

The Mausoleum of Augustus, whose construction began in 28 BCE, is located in the Campus Martius of Rome. It was one of the first major public works initiated by Augustus shortly after the establishment of the Pax Romana. With a diameter of approximately 87 meters and a height exceeding 40 meters, the mausoleum was a circular tomb, covered with earth and trees on top, exuding a sense of eternity and peace. At its core, the Mausoleum housed a central chamber that contained the ashes of Augustus and other members of the Julio-Claudian family.

The construction of the mausoleum was not merely a work of architectural grandeur but also a political statement. By erecting such an imposing funerary monument at the heart of Rome, Augustus sought to ensure his eternal memory and declare that the power of his family would last forever. This symbolism bears a strong resemblance to the grand funerary practices that had developed in the East, with Alexander the Great’s tomb being one of the most impressive examples.

The Tomb of Alexander the Great: Architecture and Symbolism

The tomb of Alexander the Great in Alexandria was one of the wonders of the ancient world. Although the exact form and location of the tomb have been lost over the centuries, ancient sources give us some clues about its magnificence and influence. According to these sources, Alexander’s tomb was housed in an elaborate mausoleum, possibly inspired by the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus, and was located in the center of Alexandria, serving as a pilgrimage site for centuries.

Tomb of Alexander the Great in Assassin's Creed: Origins

Alexander’s tomb was more than just a burial place; it was a symbol of his deification. After his death, Alexander was worshiped as a god, and his tomb served as a shrine. This symbolism of eternity and deification deeply influenced Augustus, who, recognizing the power and allure of such a tomb, sought to adopt and reinforce these symbols in his own mausoleum.

Architectural Influences and Common Elements

Although the details of Alexander’s tomb remain unclear, there are indications that Augustus drew inspiration from it. The circular shape of Augustus' Mausoleum resembles the circular tombs popular in the East, like the probable shape of Alexander’s tomb. The choice of location, in a central spot in Rome, and the use of luxurious materials and decoration reveal Augustus’ effort to create a tomb worthy of the great leaders of history.

Reconstruction Sketch of Mausoleum Augustus

Additionally, Augustus’ references to Alexander in various texts and his attempts to present himself as a new Alexander suggest that he wanted to be associated with the image of the great Macedonian conqueror. The mausoleum, as a monument not only of burial but also of worship, echoes the cult that had developed around Alexander’s tomb.

Can We Draw Information to Help Locate Alexander’s Tomb?

The study of Augustus’ Mausoleum may offer interesting insights into the identification and reconstruction of the image of Alexander the Great’s tomb. The influence of Alexander’s tomb on Augustus’ mausoleum suggests that the former was located in a central area and was a place of worship, making its possible location in the heart of Alexandria, near the famed Soma of Alexander.

However, archaeological investigations in Alexandria have proven to be extremely challenging due to modern urban development. Nevertheless, comparisons with Augustus’ Mausoleum, such as its shape, location, and use of materials, might help archaeologists search for similar features in the landscape of Alexandria. One possible approach would be to look for signs of large circular monuments or underground chambers that could be linked to the tomb.

The connection between the Mausoleum of Augustus and the lost tomb of Alexander the Great is reinforced by both ancient literary sources and archaeological analysis, allowing modern historians to draw significant parallels between the two structures. Suetonius, Dio Cassius, and Strabo highlight Augustus’ admiration for Alexander, particularly his visit to the Macedonian king’s tomb in Alexandria, where he reportedly touched the body and expressed a desire to emulate his legacy. Strabo’s description of Alexander’s tomb as a grand circular monument finds a striking parallel in the architectural design of Augustus’ Mausoleum, suggesting a conscious attempt to mirror the grandeur of Hellenistic royal burials.

Paul Zanker, in The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, explores how Augustus strategically adopted Hellenistic imagery to shape his divine and imperial persona, modeling his rule on figures like Alexander. The Res Gestae Divi Augusti, while not explicitly referencing Alexander, underscores Augustus’ efforts to create an enduring monument that would solidify his divine status, much like Hellenistic rulers who established cults around their tombs. The central placement of Augustus’ Mausoleum in Rome further reflects the prominent location of Alexander’s tomb in Alexandria, reinforcing the notion that Augustus sought to integrate elements of Hellenistic kingship into his own imperial image. While no ancient source directly states that Augustus copied Alexander’s tomb, the architectural similarities, historical context, and Augustus’ known admiration for Hellenistic ideals strongly suggest that the Mausoleum was influenced by the legendary conqueror’s burial, serving as a powerful testament to Alexander’s enduring impact on Roman leadership and self-representation.

The Ara Pacis and its Greek Roots: How the Pergamon Altar Shaped the Altar of Peace of Divine Augustus

---

By Dimosthenis Vasiloudis

---

The Altar of Peace of Divine Augustus (Ara Pacis Divi Augusti) stands as one of the most significant architectural and artistic works of the Roman Empire. It was constructed to honor the peace established by Augustus following his military campaigns in Spain and Gaul, and it serves as a manifestation of his policy promoting the Pax Romana. Although the work is distinctly Roman, its architecture and decorative elements show substantial influence from the Greek world, especially from the Pergamon Altar. In this article, we will examine the history, architecture, and artistic influences of the Ara Pacis, with particular emphasis on how it was inspired by the Temple of Pergamon.

Historical Context and Construction of the Altar

The Altar of Peace was inaugurated on January 30, 9 B.C., commemorating Augustus' return to Rome after his successful campaigns. Its construction was decreed by the Senate in 13 B.C. and was situated in the Campus Martius, an area associated with Rome’s military history and honors bestowed upon great military leaders.

The altar consists of an enclosure and an inner altar, with the enclosure decorated with relief scenes depicting the procession of the imperial family and deities associated with peace. This monument is not just a religious structure but also a political statement of Augustus' success and the new era of peace and prosperity he brought to the empire.

Architectural and Artistic Elements

The Ara Pacis is a masterpiece of Roman architecture and sculpture, blending political propaganda with religious devotion. The outer enclosure is adorned with reliefs that glorify peace, prosperity, and the moral renewal of Rome. These depictions include mythological scenes, such as the founding of Rome and the miracle of peace under Augustus' reign, along with processions portraying members of Augustus' family, priests, and other prominent figures of the time.

The reliefs on the Ara Pacis are characterized by striking realism and naturalism, traits that evolved in Hellenistic art and were transferred to Rome. This influence is evident in the portrayal of figures, the intensity of expressions, and the detailed representation of clothing and faces.

---

Asclepius to Esculapio: The Integration of the Cult of Asclepius in Roman Healing and Religion

---

The Influence of the Temple of Pergamon

One of the most significant aspects of the Ara Pacis is the influence it received from the Temple of Pergamon, particularly from the Altar of Zeus and Athena built in the 2nd century B.C. in Pergamon. The Pergamon Altar, famous for its "Gigantomachy" frieze, was one of the greatest architectural and artistic achievements of the Hellenistic period, and it had a profound impact on Roman architecture and art.

This influence is evident in both the structure and decoration of the Ara Pacis. In the Temple of Pergamon, the altar was surrounded by reliefs depicting the battle between the gods and the giants, a theme symbolizing the triumph of order and civilization over chaos and barbarism. This concept was transferred to the Ara Pacis, where the reliefs portray the peace and prosperity that result from Augustus' victory and the establishment of order in Rome.

Additionally, the structure of the Ara Pacis, with its enclosure surrounding the altar, echoes the architectural layout of the Temple of Pergamon. The symbolism of a perimeter enclosing a sacred space and the inner unity it represents are characteristics drawn from Greek models, adapted to the Roman context to serve Augustus' political and religious agenda.

The Altar of Peace of Divine Augustus is not only a religious monument but also a symbol of Augustus' power and political success. Through the study of the Ara Pacis, we can see how Rome adopted and adapted the finest elements of Greek art, blending them with its own traditions and needs. The influence of the Temple of Pergamon is clear, and the result is a monument that embodies the values of the Pax Romana while also demonstrating the continuous cultural interaction between Rome and the Hellenistic world.

The Scholarly Connection Between the Ara Pacis and the Pergamon Altar

There is no ancient literary source that explicitly records a direct connection between the Ara Pacis Augustae and the Altar of Zeus at Pergamon. However, the association between the two is based on archaeological, artistic, and historical analyses conducted by modern scholars.

Ancient sources that describe the Ara Pacis include Ovid in Fasti (1.709-722), who mentions the construction of the altar and its symbolic significance. Pliny the Elder in Natural History (36.19-36.28) references sculptural works from the Augustan period, while Cassius Dio in Roman History (53.22, 54.25) discusses the political meaning of the altar and its connection to Augustus' establishment of peace.

For the Pergamon Altar, the most notable ancient reference comes from Lucian in Against the Ignorant Book Collector (7-8), where he describes the grandeur of Pergamene constructions.

The connection between the Ara Pacis and the Pergamon Altar has been established through modern scholarly research, which highlights how the Ara Pacis borrows both artistic and ideological elements from the Pergamon Altar, especially in its relief decorations. The Pergamon Altar significantly influenced Roman sculpture and decorative art, particularly through its use of high-relief narrative sculpture, a technique that is evident in the Ara Pacis as well.

For a deeper analysis of this influence, the works of Paul Zanker in The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus (1988) and Tonio Hölscher in The Language of Images in Roman Art (2004) are highly recommended. These studies explore how Augustus utilized Hellenistic art to legitimize his rule and craft a new visual narrative for Rome, reinforcing his political and ideological agenda.

Reconstructing the Roman Emperors: The Faces of Power

The Roman Empire, one of the most significant and enduring powers in history, was shaped by the vision and ambition of its emperors. From Augustus, the empire’s first ruler, to Commodus, whose rule led to its initial decline, the men who wore the imperial purple influenced not only the fate of Rome but the entire Western world. But beyond the grand sculptures and coins depicting idealized versions of these leaders, what did they really look like?

Modern technology allows us to reconstruct their faces with impressive accuracy based on ancient busts, coins, and written descriptions. This article explores the facial reconstructions of 18 Roman emperors, offering a glimpse into the lives and legacies behind these remarkable faces. Let’s dive into each emperor’s story, starting with the dawn of the empire and ending with its first major collapse into instability.

1. Augustus (27 BC – 14 AD)

As the first emperor of Rome, Augustus ushered in a new era after defeating Mark Antony and Cleopatra. His leadership marked the transition from Republic to Empire, bringing about the Pax Romana, a period of relative peace. His facial reconstruction shows a youthful, determined man, embodying the emperor who would become a god in the eyes of his people. Augustus skillfully used propaganda to consolidate his power, ensuring that his image was revered across the empire.

2. Tiberius (14 – 37 AD)

Tiberius, Augustus’s stepson and successor, had a troubled reign, marked by growing paranoia. His facial reconstruction reflects his stoic, reserved personality. Described as a competent but reluctant ruler, Tiberius withdrew from public life in his later years, governing Rome from the island of Capri. His reign laid the groundwork for future autocrats, and his legacy is often overshadowed by his successor’s more infamous reign.

3. Caligula (37 – 41 AD)

Perhaps one of the most infamous Roman emperors, Caligula is remembered for his erratic behavior and cruelty. His facial reconstruction, surprisingly youthful and innocent, stands in contrast to his reputation. Caligula began his reign with promise but soon descended into madness, leading to acts of violence, tyranny, and excess. His brief, chaotic rule ended in assassination, but his legacy endures as one of Rome’s most notorious despots.

4. Claudius (41 – 54 AD)

Claudius was an unexpected emperor. Initially underestimated due to his physical disabilities and perceived weakness, Claudius proved to be a capable and intelligent ruler. His reign saw the conquest of Britain and many administrative reforms. The facial reconstruction portrays him as a more mature and wise figure, reflecting his perseverance and sharp intellect. Claudius managed to survive in a deadly political environment and solidified his legacy as a competent ruler.

5. Nero (54 – 68 AD)

Nero, one of the most notorious figures in Roman history, is infamous for his cruelty, extravagant lifestyle, and rumored responsibility for the Great Fire of Rome. His facial reconstruction portrays a youthful and innocent-looking figure, a stark contrast to the emperor known for his tyrannical reign. Nero’s rule began with promise, but his erratic behavior and persecution of Christians led to his downfall. His reign ended in revolt, and he took his own life to avoid capture.

6. Galba (68 – 69 AD)

Galba was the first emperor of the turbulent Year of the Four Emperors, ruling for just seven months. His reign was marked by his strict and uncompromising leadership, which quickly led to his assassination. The facial reconstruction of Galba reflects his stern and uncompromising nature, showing a man who was feared but not beloved. His short reign paved the way for more instability.

7. Otho (69 AD)

Otho’s reign was similarly short-lived, lasting just a few months. After rising to power in the chaos of 69 AD, he faced defeat at the hands of Vitellius and chose to commit suicide rather than prolong the civil war. His facial reconstruction shows a youthful man full of ambition, though ultimately he was a tragic figure who could not secure his position.

8. Vitellius (69 AD)

Vitellius, another emperor of the Year of the Four Emperors, ruled for just eight months. His indulgent and decadent reign was characterized by excess, gluttony, and brutality. Vitellius’s facial reconstruction presents a more corpulent, rough figure, embodying the traits that eventually led to his downfall. He was eventually captured and killed, marking the end of one of the shortest and most chaotic reigns in Roman history.

9. Vespasian (69 – 79 AD)

After the chaos of 69 AD, Vespasian restored stability to Rome and founded the Flavian dynasty. Known for his practical, no-nonsense approach, Vespasian is remembered for his military leadership and reforms. His facial reconstruction shows a hardened, experienced man who had seen both military and political strife. Vespasian also began construction of the Colosseum, which became one of the most iconic symbols of Rome.

10. Titus (79 – 81 AD)

Titus, the son of Vespasian, had a brief but eventful reign. He successfully completed the Colosseum and dealt with natural disasters, including the eruption of Mount Vesuvius and a devastating fire in Rome. His facial reconstruction reflects a warm and charismatic figure, fitting his reputation as a beloved ruler who cared for his people during difficult times.

11. Domitian (81 – 96 AD)

The last of the Flavian dynasty, Domitian ruled with an iron fist. His reign, though economically prosperous, was marked by paranoia, harsh treatment of his opponents, and eventual assassination. His facial reconstruction reflects a stern and severe man, embodying the authoritarian ruler who kept the Senate at arm’s length. Domitian's legacy remains controversial, as he was both a capable administrator and a feared tyrant.

12. Nerva (96 – 98 AD)

Nerva came to power after Domitian’s assassination, marking the beginning of the "Five Good Emperors." His short reign stabilized the empire after Domitian’s tyranny. His reconstructed face presents an older, wiser man, reflecting his role as a caretaker ruler who prepared the empire for more stable leadership. Nerva's most significant act was adopting Trajan as his successor, ensuring a peaceful transition of power.

13. Trajan (98 – 117 AD)

Trajan is remembered as one of the greatest emperors, expanding Rome’s territory to its largest extent. His reign was marked by military victories, public works, and overall prosperity. The facial reconstruction shows a strong, confident man, perfectly embodying the warrior-emperor who led Rome to its peak in both territory and influence. His conquests, particularly in Dacia, cemented his legacy as a powerful and effective ruler.

14. Hadrian (117 – 138 AD)

Hadrian’s rule was characterized by consolidation rather than expansion. He is perhaps best known for building Hadrian’s Wall in Britain, marking the northern limit of the Roman Empire. His reconstructed face presents a thoughtful and introspective figure, reflecting his love of Greek culture and philosophy. Hadrian spent much of his reign traveling the empire, strengthening its borders, and investing in its cultural development.

15. Antoninus Pius (138 – 161 AD)

Antoninus Pius presided over one of the most peaceful and prosperous periods in Roman history. His reign was marked by internal stability, legal reforms, and a strong economy. The facial reconstruction shows a mature, composed man who ruled with a steady hand. Antoninus Pius avoided major military conflicts and focused on maintaining the strength of the empire through diplomacy and good governance.

16. Lucius Verus (161 – 169 AD)

Lucius Verus co-ruled the empire with Marcus Aurelius, an unusual arrangement in Roman history. His rule was marked by military success, particularly against the Parthians, though he lived a more indulgent lifestyle than his co-emperor. His facial reconstruction shows a younger, more relaxed man, contrasting with Marcus Aurelius's more austere image. Lucius Verus was seen as a competent, if less philosophical, leader.

17. Marcus Aurelius (161 – 180 AD)

Marcus Aurelius, known as the philosopher-emperor, ruled during a time of wars and plagues, yet is remembered for his wisdom and stoic philosophy. His facial reconstruction shows a thoughtful, world-weary man, embodying the responsibility and hardship of his reign. His famous "Meditations" continue to influence philosophical thought, and despite the challenges he faced, he is remembered as one of Rome's greatest emperors.

18. Commodus (177 – 192 AD)

Commodus, the son of Marcus Aurelius, marked a drastic decline from his father’s rule. His reign was characterized by excess, self-indulgence, and delusions of grandeur, including participating in gladiatorial games. His facial reconstruction shows a youthful, arrogant figure, mirroring his reputation as an emperor who believed himself to be a living god. His assassination in 192 AD triggered a period of instability that eventually led to the empire's decline.

Conclusion: The Changing Faces of Empire

These 18 emperors, spanning over two centuries of Roman history, represent the complex, often turbulent nature of the empire. From Augustus’s steady hand to Commodus’s dangerous instability, their reigns shaped the course of Western civilization. The reconstructed faces provide a fascinating glimpse into the humanity behind the power—each emperor a man of ambition, strength, and, at times, fragility. Their legacies continue to resonate today, reminding us of the power and fragility of even the greatest of empires.

The World's Only Intact Roman Legionary Shield: A Glimpse into Ancient Military History

In the annals of Roman military history, few discoveries can rival the significance of the Roman legionary shield unearthed at the ancient city of Dura-Europos. Found in the 1930s, this incredible artifact is the only known intact Roman legionary shield ever discovered, dating from the early 3rd century AD. Its preservation offers historians, archaeologists, and enthusiasts an unprecedented look into the daily life, craftsmanship, and military equipment of Roman soldiers.

The Ancient City of Dura-Europos: A Roman Stronghold

Dura-Europos, located in modern-day Syria, was a thriving city along the Euphrates River that changed hands between multiple empires, including the Seleucids, Parthians, and Romans. By the time of its abandonment in the 3rd century AD, Dura-Europos had become a key Roman frontier fortress, guarding the empire's eastern flank from invasions. It was here, amidst the city's ruins, that archaeologists unearthed the legionary shield—a testament to Roman military power.

The city itself is a treasure trove of archaeological finds, offering layers of insight into ancient cultures. Its fortifications, temples, and artifacts have informed scholars about Roman and Parthian military strategies, as well as the cultural intermingling that occurred on this distant frontier of the Roman Empire. However, the discovery of the shield is perhaps the most valuable find, as it provides an extraordinary window into the equipment of a Roman legionary.

The Shield: A Testament to Roman Craftsmanship

The shield is a rare example of Roman military equipment from the early 3rd century AD. Constructed primarily of wood and iron, it features a central boss (the round protruding section in the middle), which would have been used to deflect blows during combat. The shield also includes bronze fittings, showcasing the attention to detail and functionality in Roman craftsmanship.

The preservation of the shield is astonishing. It survived for nearly two millennia, buried in the soil of Dura-Europos, which provided ideal anaerobic conditions (low oxygen levels that slow down decay). This fortuitous combination of factors allowed the wooden components of the shield to remain intact, making it an unparalleled artifact in the study of Roman military history.

The design of the shield follows the standard style used by Roman legionaries during the early 3rd century AD. Shields like this were essential to the Roman military's success, providing both protection and offensive capabilities in battle. The detailed craftsmanship of the bronze fittings and the boss suggest that this shield was not only practical but also a symbol of the soldier’s status and the military's strength.

The Roman Legionary: Life Behind the Shield

The shield offers valuable insight into the life of a Roman legionary during the 3rd century AD. Legionaries were the backbone of the Roman military, professional soldiers who served for long periods, often in distant and dangerous parts of the empire. Their equipment, like the shield, was designed for both defense and versatility, allowing them to fight effectively in a variety of terrains and conditions.

A legionary’s shield was more than just a piece of armor; it was an essential tool for survival. In the heat of battle, shields protected soldiers from arrows, swords, and spears. Legionaries were trained to use their shields in concert with their fellow soldiers, forming the famous Roman testudo (tortoise) formation, where shields locked together to create an almost impenetrable wall. The intact shield discovered at Dura-Europos would have played a critical role in such formations.

The shield also reflects the organizational and logistical might of the Roman military. Roman soldiers were equipped with standardized gear, mass-produced to ensure that every legionary had the necessary tools for battle. The uniformity of their equipment contributed to the Roman army’s effectiveness and their ability to conquer and hold such a vast empire.

The Importance of the Dura-Europos Shield in Historical Studies

The discovery of this intact shield is nothing short of extraordinary for historians and archaeologists alike. While countless references to Roman shields exist in historical texts, artistic depictions, and fragments of remains from other sites, none offer the completeness of the Dura-Europos shield. Its intact state allows researchers to better understand the materials and methods used in its construction, adding depth to our knowledge of Roman military engineering.

Moreover, the shield provides a tangible connection to the day-to-day experiences of Roman legionaries. It is a physical reminder of the risks they faced, the battles they fought, and the sophisticated military machine they were a part of. By studying this artifact, historians gain a better understanding of the Roman Empire’s military strategies and the technological innovations that helped maintain its dominance for centuries.

The End of Dura-Europos and the Fate of the Shield

Dura-Europos fell to the Sassanian Persians in the mid-3rd century AD, an event that likely marked the abandonment of the city. The shield, buried amidst the ruins, was left behind, forgotten for centuries until its discovery in the 20th century. The conditions of its burial—likely within a collapsed structure—contributed to its remarkable preservation.

The Sassanian assault that led to the city's fall was part of a broader conflict between the Roman and Persian empires. The intact shield represents not only the military history of the Roman Empire but also the geopolitical struggles that shaped the ancient world.

Conclusion: A Window into the Roman Past

The intact Roman legionary shield discovered at Dura-Europos is a rare and precious artifact that sheds light on the life of Roman soldiers, the craftsmanship of their equipment, and the military history of the Roman Empire. Its preservation offers an invaluable opportunity for researchers to explore the intricacies of Roman military technology and the conditions of life on the empire's frontier.

As one of the few surviving examples of a complete Roman shield, this find underscores the importance of archaeology in reconstructing the ancient past. It stands as a symbol of Rome’s military might, its far-reaching influence, and the complex history of a city at the crossroads of empires. Today, it remains a testament to the resilience of both the Roman legionaries who once wielded it and the history that has endured through their legacy.

The Racial Continuity of Ancient and Modern Greece: A Study of Physical Anthropology, Art, and Literature

The study of racial and cultural traits in ancient civilizations has long fascinated historians, anthropologists, and art historians alike. When it comes to Greece, a civilization with profound historical influence, the question of racial makeup and continuity through the ages has often sparked debate. By examining physical anthropology, literary records, and artistic depictions, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the racial continuity in Greece from ancient to modern times.

1. Racial Continuity in Greece: Dinaric-Alpine-Mediterranean Elements

One of the key conclusions from physical anthropology is that Greece has exhibited racial continuity throughout its history. The ancient Greeks, like their modern descendants, were primarily composed of three key racial elements: Dinaric, Alpine, and Mediterranean. These racial types are still prevalent in Greece today, signifying a continuity that spans millennia. Importantly, there is no significant difference in the racial type between ancient Greek aristocrats, commoners, and criminals, indicating a consistent demographic throughout various social strata.

• Mediterranean Type: Characterized by dark hair and eyes, a long skull, a narrow face, and a lean physique, the Mediterranean type is believed to be associated with the earliest creators of civilization in the Fertile Crescent and extends across a wide geographical range, from the Atlantic to India.

• Dinaric and Alpine Types: While the Dinaric type is characterized by a long face, a beaky nose, and tall stature, the Alpine type presents a more stocky build with a broad skull and brown hair, common across Central Europe and extending into Greece.

This continuity aligns with modern findings, suggesting that the people of Greece have retained these core racial elements over thousands of years.

2. Brunet and Fair Individuals in Ancient Greece

Greek literature provides further insight into the racial diversity of the population. Ancient Greek writings mention both brunet and fair individuals, similar to the variation observed in modern Greece. However, ancient Greeks did not ascribe any form of superiority to one type over the other, demonstrating that, unlike in some later cultures, physical appearance was not directly tied to social or cultural dominance.

This contrasts with certain assumptions made in other parts of Europe, where fair complexion often came to be associated with the nobility or warrior classes. In Greece, the population maintained a balanced view, with brunet and fair individuals coexisting without one being favored in historical texts or art.

3. Greek Art: A Predominance of Brunet Types

Ancient Greek art, renowned for its beauty and precision, provides valuable visual records of the population’s appearance. Statues, frescoes, and pottery primarily depict individuals with brunet features—dark hair and eyes—with only a small minority of figures shown as fair-haired. Even those depicted as fair are rarely as light as Northern Europeans, and their physical features, such as body build, remain consistent with their brunet counterparts.

This observation underscores the idea that the ancient Greeks were largely Mediterranean in appearance, with some variation but little deviation from this norm. It also supports the evidence that fair types, while present, were not as common and did not significantly differ in physique from brunet types.

4. Greek Self-Descriptions: A People of Intermediate Pigmentation

Ancient Greek descriptions of themselves, as well as their descriptions of other peoples, provide additional clarity on their racial identity. The Greeks perceived themselves as intermediate in pigmentation between the Northern Europeans—often described as fair-haired “barbarians”—and the darker-skinned peoples of Africa and the Near East.

This positioning reflects both the geographical and cultural reality of Greece: a civilization situated at the crossroads of Europe, Africa, and Asia, absorbing influences from each and existing in a racial spectrum that bridges northern and southern populations. Modern Greeks, too, continue to exhibit this intermediate pigmentation, further cementing the idea of racial continuity in the region.

In summary, the anthropological, literary, and artistic evidence points to a clear racial continuity in Greece, from antiquity to the present day. The predominance of Dinaric, Alpine, and Mediterranean racial types has remained consistent, with both brunet and fair individuals being present throughout history. Greek art and literature reflect a society that valued these traits equally, without elevating one type over another. Descriptions of the Greeks themselves suggest that they viewed their pigmentation as intermediate between the paler peoples of the north and the darker peoples of the south—a perception that persists in modern times.

Through these findings, we can appreciate the enduring legacy of the ancient Greeks, not only in their cultural and intellectual contributions but also in the physical characteristics of their descendants, who continue to reflect the diverse yet unified racial composition of their ancestors.

Endnotes:

1. The Mediterranean type is defined by dark hair, dark eyes, skin that tans easily, a long skull, a narrow face, and a lean body build.

2. Brachycephalic refers to individuals with broad skulls, while Dolichocephalic refers to those with long skulls, and Mesocephalic is an intermediate form.

3. The Alpine type is prevalent across Central Europe and characterized by broad skulls, brown hair, and a stocky build.

4. The Nordic type, common in Northern Europe, features blonde straight hair, light eyes, a narrow face, and a higher forehead.

5. The Dinaric type has a long face, beaky nose, short skull, and tall, lean build.

6. Studies show that fair-haired individuals comprised only a small percentage of the Greek population, aligning with modern-day figures.

King Harald Fairhair and the Battle of Hafrsfjord: The Unification of Norway

In the annals of Norwegian history, few moments shine as brightly as the unification of Norway under the rule of King Harald Fairhair. This historic event, symbolized by the iconic Sverd i Fjell (Swords in Rock) monument, tells the tale of an eight-year-long campaign that culminated in the legendary Battle of Hafrsfjord.

It was here, around 880 AD, that King Harald faced off against the last remaining independent Viking kings and brought an end to the era of fragmented clans and rival chieftains.

The Ambition of Harald Fairhair

Harald Fairhair, also known as Harald Hårfagre, was driven by a bold vision: to unite the numerous and often warring Viking kingdoms of Norway under a single ruler. Before his rise, Norway was divided into numerous petty kingdoms, each ruled by powerful local chieftains or minor kings. These smaller realms were frequently at odds, engaging in raiding, skirmishing, and power struggles that fragmented the nation.

A statue of Harald Fairhair, the first king of Norway (c. 850 – c. 932 AD). The statue was erected in 1872 AD, at the Haraldshaugen monument in Haugesund, Norway.

Legend has it that Harald’s desire to unify Norway was inspired by his love for Gyda, a princess from Hordaland. When Harald proposed to her, Gyda reportedly responded that she would only marry him if he became the sole ruler of all Norway. Determined to win her hand, Harald swore an oath not to cut or comb his hair until he had achieved this monumental goal. For ten long years, his hair grew wild as he set out on a mission to conquer the Viking lords and bring the country under one banner.

The Battle of Hafrsfjord: A Defining Moment

By 872 AD, Harald had already subdued many of the rival kings, but there were still pockets of resistance. The most significant threat to Harald's ambition came from a coalition of powerful Viking kings who controlled various parts of western Norway. They refused to submit to Harald’s rule, and the conflict culminated in the Battle of Hafrsfjord, fought around 880 AD.

The Battle of Hafrsfjord, which took place near modern-day Stavanger, was a fierce and decisive conflict. Harald’s forces clashed with a large alliance of Viking rulers who had banded together in a last-ditch effort to resist his unification efforts. The battle is believed to have been fought on both land and sea, with longships converging on the fjord’s waters and warriors engaging in brutal hand-to-hand combat on the shores.

Despite the strength of his opponents, Harald’s forces emerged victorious. The defeat of the opposing kings marked the end of significant resistance to his rule, and in the aftermath of the battle, Harald Fairhair was recognized as the first king of a united Norway. This momentous victory consolidated his control over the entire region and ushered in a new era of Norwegian history.

The Sverd i Fjell Monument: A Testament to Peace, Unity, and Freedom

To commemorate the unification of Norway and the significance of the Battle of Hafrsfjord, the Sverd i Fjell monument was erected in 1983. Located on the shores of Hafrsfjord, near Stavanger, this awe-inspiring monument consists of three enormous bronze swords embedded in solid rock. The towering swords, standing at over 10 meters tall, are not only a powerful reminder of Norway's martial past but also a symbol of peace, unity, and freedom.

The hilts of the swords are replicas of Viking weapons from the era of Harald Fairhair, each meticulously crafted to reflect the design and craftsmanship of the time. However, while the swords are an homage to the battles and bloodshed that led to Norway’s unification, their placement in the rock carries a deeper meaning. The swords are embedded in stone to symbolize that these wars are over and that the peace forged by Harald’s victory is everlasting.

Each sword represents a different value:

• The largest sword symbolizes the might and power of King Harald, who unified the clans and brought the disparate kingdoms together under his rule.

• The second sword represents the Viking kings who were defeated and their submission to Harald’s reign, bringing an end to the era of constant warring.

• The third sword stands for peace, symbolizing the unity and stability that followed the brutal conflict and the establishment of Norway as one kingdom.

Today, the Sverd i Fjell monument is not only a significant historical site but also a popular tourist attraction, drawing visitors from around the world to marvel at its grandeur and the powerful story it tells. It serves as a reminder that the freedoms and unity enjoyed by modern Norway were hard-won through courage, determination, and sacrifice.

King Harald’s Legacy: The Father of Norway

Harald Fairhair’s unification of Norway had a profound and lasting impact on the nation’s history. His victory at Hafrsfjord laid the foundation for the establishment of the Norwegian monarchy, and he is often referred to as the "Father of Norway." Under Harald’s reign, the kingdom grew more centralized, and the Viking Age continued to flourish, with Norwegian warriors, traders, and explorers setting out across the seas.

Harald himself went on to rule for many years after the battle, eventually passing the throne to his descendants, establishing a royal lineage that continues to this day. His legacy lives on not only in the annals of history but also in the cultural consciousness of Norway.

Conclusion: A Monumental Chapter in Norwegian History

The story of King Harald Fairhair and the Battle of Hafrsfjord is one of ambition, conflict, and ultimate unity. The Sverd i Fjell monument stands as a timeless tribute to this defining chapter in Norway’s past, representing the transition from a fragmented land of warring clans to a united kingdom under one ruler. It is a symbol of the peace, freedom, and unity that came from the struggles of Harald Fairhair’s time, a reminder that even the hardest-fought victories can lead to enduring peace.

For Norwegians and visitors alike, the monument at Hafrsfjord offers a glimpse into the nation’s Viking heritage, a time when warriors roamed the seas and kings battled for supremacy. It reminds us that, while the days of Viking conquest may be long gone, their legacy lives on in the heart of Norway’s history and culture.

The Mycenaean Necromanteion of Palaiokastro: The Oldest Ritual Site in Greece

---

BY DIMOSTHENIS VASILOUDIS

---

The village of Palaiokastro in Gortynia, Arcadia, although small with few inhabitants, hosts one of the most significant archaeological sites of the Mycenaean period in Greece. The Mycenaean cemetery and the ancient necromanteion discovered there reveal new aspects of Greece’s prehistory, offering significant insights into the religious and ritual practices of the Mycenaeans. These findings bring to light part of the mysterious world of religion and death cults of the time, while the potential link between the site and the Homeric city of Pherae (Phere) adds particular importance to the location.

The Extensive Mycenaean Cemetery

The archaeological excavations on the hill of Palaiokastro, which began in 1955 and continued systematically from 1979, brought to light a large Mycenaean cemetery. With a total of 500 tombs, of which approximately 150 have been excavated, the cemetery is considered the largest discovered in Greece. The tombs, of various types such as tholos, chamber, shaft, and box-shaped, reveal the long-term use of the site for over 400 years, from 1500 to 1100 BCE.

The rich burial offerings discovered in the tombs, including gold jewelry and pottery, indicate the prosperity of the community that lived there. These findings are exhibited at the Archaeological Museum of Tripoli and demonstrate the region’s connection with broader cultural and trade exchanges of the Mycenaean era. The significance of the cemetery is immense, as it sheds light on previously unknown aspects of Mycenaean burial and social life.

The Mycenaean Necromanteion

Within the cemetery, a ritual structure was found, which, according to archaeologist Theodoros Spyropoulos, functioned as a necromanteion. This necromanteion, the only one of the Mycenaean period discovered to date, is considered the oldest in Greece and operated from 1600 to 1200 BCE. It is an underground chamber tomb with a corridor and chamber, where a platform was found with a small house-like structure and a pillar-shaped boulder (baetyl) that served as an aniconic representation of a deity.

The unique construction of the necromanteion, with openings in the walls and a libation basin in the ceiling, resembles the Nekyia described in Homer’s Odyssey. The “psychagogoi"—holes in the walls—suggest the use of the site for summoning the dead. The necromanteion of Palaiochastro was likely used for rituals related to ancestor worship and communication with the underworld, offering rare insights into Mycenaean religious practices.

The Significance of Homeric Pherae

One of the most enigmatic issues related to Palaiochastro is its potential connection to the Homeric city of Phere, as described in Book XI of the Odyssey. According to historian Konstantinos Syriopoulos, the area of Palaiochastro likely corresponds to the capital of King Orsilochus’s kingdom, which hosted Telemachus on his journey to Sparta.

The geographical location of Palaiokastro, near the rivers Alpheios and Bouphagos, along with its strategic position offering panoramic views, supports this hypothesis. If this identification is correct, Mycenaean topography takes on new dimensions, as the Mycenaean site of Kakovatos is also identified with Nestor’s Pylos. Thus, Palaiokastro is not only linked to the world of religion and the dead but also to the geography and history of the Homeric era.

Conclusion

Palaiochastro in Gortynia is one of the most important archaeological sites in Greece. The extensive Mycenaean cemetery, along with the unique necromanteion, sheds light on the religious life and burial practices of the Mycenaeans, while its potential identification with Homeric Phere opens new avenues for understanding the topography and history of the Homeric period. This site, with its ancient religious and cultural significance, offers invaluable insights into the prehistoric world of Arcadia and its long-standing use.

A Serendipitous Encounter with Queen Hatshepsut: A Tourist’s Moment of Reflection

There are moments in travel when the modern world collides with the ancient, offering an unforgettable connection to the past. This image of a foreign tourist, smiling in peaceful harmony next to the statue of Queen Hatshepsut, captures one such moment, a serene reflection of history and human continuity.

The Majesty of Queen Hatshepsut

Queen Hatshepsut, one of the most extraordinary rulers in ancient Egypt, reigned during the 18th Dynasty, around 1479–1458 BCE. As Egypt's longest-reigning female pharaoh, she ruled not as a queen consort or regent, but as a full-fledged monarch. In an unprecedented move for a woman of her time, she depicted herself as a male ruler in statues and reliefs, complete with the traditional pharaonic beard and attire. Her reign was marked by peace, prosperity, and monumental building projects that have left a lasting legacy in the sands of Egypt.

Her most famous architectural achievement is the mortuary temple at Deir el-Bahari, located on the west bank of the Nile, near the Valley of the Kings. The grand temple is carved into the cliffs, with terraces and colonnades that rise majestically from the desert floor. It stands as a testament to her vision and ambition, forever enshrined in Egyptian history.

A Traveler’s Timeless Connection

The photograph of the tourist standing next to the colossal statue of Queen Hatshepsut at Deir el-Bahari brings forth an intriguing juxtaposition of ancient and modern. The tourist, with her sunglasses resting on her head and a calm, thoughtful smile, reflects a deep connection with history, as if contemplating the weight of time itself. The statue, weathered by thousands of years, gazes into eternity, unmoved by the passage of centuries.

This image is more than just a fun travel snapshot; it symbolizes the human desire to reach across time, to connect with those who lived long before us. For a moment, the tourist becomes part of a story that began more than three millennia ago, standing shoulder to shoulder with a queen who defied the norms of her age and left an indelible mark on history.

The Legacy of Hatshepsut

Hatshepsut’s reign was a time of great prosperity for Egypt. She spearheaded extensive building projects, particularly in Thebes, and restored many temples and monuments. Her mortuary temple, where this statue resides, was designed to align with the rising sun and was dedicated to the god Amun, with whom Hatshepsut associated her divine kingship. Beyond her architectural achievements, she expanded trade routes and established wealth-building expeditions, like the famous journey to the Land of Punt, which brought back riches that further enhanced her kingdom's glory.

However, after her death, her legacy was nearly erased. Her successor, Thutmose III, ordered the destruction or defacement of many of her statues and monuments, possibly to reinforce his own legitimacy as pharaoh. Despite these efforts, Hatshepsut’s story endured, her achievements rediscovered by archaeologists in the modern era.

Reflection in the Sands of Time

There is something deeply symbolic about posing next to a statue of an ancient ruler like Hatshepsut. The act of visiting such historical sites is, in itself, a journey through time. This photograph conveys a sense of shared humanity, a reflection of the power of art and history to transcend time, language, and culture.

The tourist, standing side by side with a monumental figure of history, bridges a gap between past and present. In that quiet smile, we see more than just a traveler enjoying a moment of light-hearted fun; we see a silent acknowledgment of the awe-inspiring presence of one of the most remarkable figures in ancient history. Hatshepsut, a woman who ruled as king, continues to captivate us today. Her story, carved in stone, still whispers to those who stand in her presence.

For the modern traveler, visiting such historical landmarks is more than just sightseeing—it's an opportunity to pause and reflect on the passage of time, the rise and fall of civilizations, and the enduring nature of human achievement. Queen Hatshepsut, in all her grandeur, invites us to remember that the echoes of history are always within reach. We can all, like this tourist, find ourselves in the company of greatness—if only for a fleeting moment.

The Mystery of the Mummified Child's Hand Gripping a Roman Coin: A Glimpse into the Ancient World

In the heart of the Denon Museum in Chalon-sur-Saône, France, lies a haunting and enigmatic artifact—a mummified child's hand, clutching a Roman coin. The image is both unsettling and fascinating, drawing visitors into a forgotten past. This relic, small yet significant, whispers tales of ancient Rome, forgotten rituals, and the fragile balance between life and death in antiquity.

Discovery of the Artifact

The exact circumstances of the artifact’s discovery remain shrouded in mystery. However, it is believed to have been unearthed in the region of modern-day Burgundy, which was part of the Roman Empire's vast dominion during its height. Chalon-sur-Saône, known as Cavillonum in Roman times, was a significant town, serving as a crucial trade route and military post in the empire. Roman influence in the region was substantial, leaving behind an array of coins, pottery, and other remnants of the era. However, few finds are as evocative as this mummified hand.

The Hand and the Coin: A Unique Find

Mummification in Europe, particularly in the cooler and wetter climate of France, was an uncommon practice outside of the Mediterranean and Egyptian worlds. Yet, certain environmental conditions can naturally mummify remains, particularly in burial sites or under specific preservation techniques that prevent decay. The child's hand, preserved in such a way, tells us much about the conditions in which it was found but leaves open many questions about the circumstances of the child’s life and death.

Gripped tightly in the desiccated fingers is a Roman coin, minted during a time when the empire was vast and powerful. The coin, a common bronze as, depicts the face of an emperor, though time has worn away much of its detail. Experts at the Denon Museum have dated the coin to the 2nd century AD, during the rule of one of Rome’s more influential emperors, possibly Marcus Aurelius or Antoninus Pius. But what makes this coin remarkable is not its value, but its placement—locked in the grasp of a child's hand.

The Symbolism of Coins in Ancient Roman Burials

The inclusion of coins in Roman burials was not merely a matter of wealth or status. In Roman mythology, coins were placed with the dead to pay the ferryman, Charon, for passage across the river Styx to the afterlife. This tradition, known as Charon’s obol, was a common funerary practice in Roman culture. The coin was often placed in the mouth of the deceased, symbolizing the fee for safe passage.

In the case of the mummified child's hand, the placement of the coin raises intriguing questions. Why is the coin tightly gripped in the hand rather than placed in the mouth or near the body, as was typical? Was this a deliberate choice made by the child's family or caretakers, or was it a coincidence of how the body was discovered? Perhaps the child died suddenly, and the coin was intended for use but never placed correctly, leaving the child clutching it in death.

Life and Death in Roman Gaul

This artifact also opens a window into life in Roman Gaul. Roman-occupied Gaul, where the child once lived, was a melting pot of cultures. Celtic traditions blended with Roman customs, and burial practices often reflected this syncretism. The Roman elite and wealthier classes would follow Roman traditions, including funerary rites with coins, while the local Celtic population might incorporate their own beliefs and customs into these practices.

The child’s life may have been shaped by this cultural mix. Was the child Roman, or of local Gallic descent? The presence of the Roman coin suggests Roman influence or at least Romanized customs in the family’s household. The child’s age, sex, and status are unknown, but the careful placement of the body and the coin suggest some level of importance, or at least adherence to Roman religious beliefs surrounding the afterlife.

Scientific Analysis and Speculation

The Denon Museum has allowed researchers to examine the artifact, though they have been cautious to preserve its fragile state. X-ray and CT scans have provided some insight into the hand’s preservation, suggesting it may have been buried in a dry environment, possibly a sealed tomb or sarcophagus, which allowed for the natural mummification process.

As for the coin, experts have noted that it was worn but still identifiable. Its presence raises numerous questions about Roman burial rites for children, a relatively under-explored topic in archaeology. Some theorize that children were buried with fewer formalities than adults, perhaps due to their perceived innocence or the belief that they required less preparation for the journey to the afterlife.

The hand, still gripping the coin, may suggest a hurried or incomplete burial, or perhaps a different ritual entirely. Could this have been part of a forgotten local custom? Or might it reflect a particular belief about children in the afterlife? Without more evidence, these questions remain open to speculation.

A Haunting Reminder of the Past

The mummified child’s hand with its Roman coin remains a powerful symbol of the fragility of life in the ancient world. It reminds us of the universality of death, but also of the specific beliefs and customs that ancient cultures used to cope with it. For the Romans, the afterlife was a tangible journey, and the coin represented the means to ensure safe passage.

As this small, delicate hand continues to grasp the coin centuries later, it invites us to ponder not only the life and death of this particular child but also the broader practices of a bygone era. The artifact stands as a poignant reminder that even in death, the hands of the past still reach out to us, holding on to the stories we have yet to fully understand.

The Denon Museum: A Treasure Trove of History

The Denon Museum, located in Chalon-sur-Saône, is home to a rich collection of artifacts spanning centuries of history. The museum, named after Dominique Vivant Denon, a diplomat and archaeologist who played a key role in the development of the Louvre, offers a glimpse into the ancient and medieval past of the region. The mummified child’s hand is one of its most unique and thought-provoking exhibits, attracting scholars, history enthusiasts, and curious visitors alike.

In this small French town, the artifact stands as a testament to the enduring fascination with the Roman Empire, its customs, and the ways in which its influence reached even the most distant corners of the ancient world.

When And Why Did Ancient Egyptians Stop Mummifying Their Dead?

The Decline of Mummification in Ancient Egypt: Cultural and Religious Shifts

Mummification stands as one of the most enduring symbols of ancient Egyptian civilization, a practice rooted in their deeply spiritual beliefs about the afterlife. The Egyptians believed that preserving the body was essential for the deceased to enjoy eternity, as the physical form was thought to house the soul. For over three millennia, this ritual was meticulously practiced, with estimates suggesting that more than 70 million mummies were made during this period. However, the practice did not last forever. Between the 4th and 7th centuries AD, mummification fell out of favor as Egypt transitioned into the Christian era.

The Rise and Pinnacle of Mummification

The origins of mummification in Egypt date back to the prehistoric period, but it was during the Old Kingdom (c. 2686–2181 BC) that it became a formalized process, associated with the elite and royalty. As time progressed, mummification techniques became more sophisticated, involving the removal of internal organs, desiccation of the body with natron, and wrapping the corpse in linen. The purpose was clear: to safeguard the body from decay, thus ensuring the deceased’s survival in the afterlife.

Mummification reached its zenith during the 21st Dynasty (1069–945 BC), particularly during the period known as the Third Intermediate Period. The political fragmentation of Egypt at this time saw an increasing importance placed on religious practices, with the priesthood, especially of Amun, playing a central role in the society. The detailed and intricate processes of mummification were perfected, and the practice was no longer reserved exclusively for royalty. People from all walks of life, provided they had the means, could be mummified.

Religious Changes and the Decline of Mummification

The decline of mummification began gradually, starting around the 4th century AD. By this time, Egypt had been part of the Roman Empire for several centuries, and Christianity was spreading rapidly across the region. The Edict of Milan in 313 AD legalized Christianity, and over time, Egypt’s deeply ingrained pagan traditions began to be replaced by Christian practices.

Christianity brought with it a different understanding of the body and the afterlife. Whereas the ancient Egyptians believed that preserving the body was essential for the soul’s journey in the afterlife, Christians emphasized the resurrection of the soul rather than the preservation of the physical form. This theological shift rendered mummification unnecessary and, in many Christian circles, inappropriate. By the 7th century AD, Egypt had largely ceased its mummification practices.

The End of an Era

Mummification’s decline was not only religious but also cultural. As Egypt transitioned from a society dominated by its ancient religious traditions to one integrated into the Christian and later Islamic world, many aspects of its ancient culture were abandoned. The old temples fell into disuse, hieroglyphic writing disappeared, and with it, the art and tradition of mummification faded into history.

The cessation of mummification marks a significant transformation in Egypt’s religious and cultural identity. What had once been a cornerstone of their belief system was abandoned in favor of new spiritual ideals. However, the legacy of mummification endures in the thousands of mummies discovered by archaeologists, offering an enduring connection to a civilization whose beliefs about life, death, and the afterlife still captivate the imagination today.

The stopping of mummification in Egypt was a direct result of the rise of Christianity and the shift in religious priorities that came with it. As the ancient practices faded, a new spiritual order took hold, shaping the Egypt we know from the late Roman period through the Byzantine and Islamic eras. This transition underscores the profound impact that religious and cultural changes can have on the long-standing traditions of a society, ultimately marking the end of a practice that had defined ancient Egypt for over three millennia.

Though the mummification process may no longer be in practice, its echoes remain a vital part of the historical and archaeological narrative, offering insight into one of history's most intriguing civilizations.